Out with the old and in with the new: T90 codends improve size selectivity in the Canadian redfish (Sebastes mentella) trawl fishery

The size selectivity of four codends were compared in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, redfish fishery (Sebastes mentella), including the regulated diamond mesh codend with a mesh opening of 90 mm (T0) and three experimental codends of different mesh openings (90, 100, 110 mm) in which the netting...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng, Zhaohai, Winger, Paul D., Bayse, Shannon M., Kebede, Gebremeskel Eshetu, DeLouche, Harold, Einarsson , Haraldur Arnar, Pol, Michael V., Kelly, David, Walsh, Stephen J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: NRC Research Press (a division of Canadian Science Publishing) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1807/102126
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0063
Description
Summary:The size selectivity of four codends were compared in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, redfish fishery (Sebastes mentella), including the regulated diamond mesh codend with a mesh opening of 90 mm (T0) and three experimental codends of different mesh openings (90, 100, 110 mm) in which the netting is turned 90° to the direction of tow (T90). Results for the regulated codend showed that there was little size selection, catching greater than 97% of redfish over all of the length classes observed. Considering the fished population, the smallest T90 codend would catch 30% fewer redfish under the minimum landing size (MLS) of 22 cm compared with the T0 codend, but would also lose 16% of catch above 22 cm. The T90 codend with 100 mm mesh opening had the same size selectivity as the smallest T90 codend. The 110 mm T90 codend would catch 50% less redfish below MLS but lose 40% of redfish above MLS. Overall, results show that T90 codends improve size selectivity in which large proportions of undersized fish are successfully released. The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author.