Was Australian Antarctica Won Fairly?

The Winning of Australian Antarctica (A. Grenfell Price) described the Douglas Mawson led British Australian New Zealand Research Expedition (BANZARE) and the contest to claim Antarctic territory ahead of Norway. Norwegian versions of this contest, by Bjarne Aagaard and Hans Bogen, were critical of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Barrett, ND
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/
https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/1/01-_Was_Australian_Antarctica_Won_Fairly_-e_version.pdf
https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/2/02-_Was_Australian_Antarctica_Won_Fairly-e_version.pdf
id ftunivtasmania:oai:eprints.utas.edu.au:7732
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasmania:oai:eprints.utas.edu.au:7732 2023-05-15T13:36:46+02:00 Was Australian Antarctica Won Fairly? Barrett, ND 2007 application/pdf https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/ https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/1/01-_Was_Australian_Antarctica_Won_Fairly_-e_version.pdf https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/2/02-_Was_Australian_Antarctica_Won_Fairly-e_version.pdf en eng https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/1/01-_Was_Australian_Antarctica_Won_Fairly_-e_version.pdf https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/2/02-_Was_Australian_Antarctica_Won_Fairly-e_version.pdf Barrett, ND 2007 , 'Was Australian Antarctica Won Fairly?', Honours thesis, University of Tasmania. cc_utas Thesis NonPeerReviewed 2007 ftunivtasmania 2020-05-30T07:21:29Z The Winning of Australian Antarctica (A. Grenfell Price) described the Douglas Mawson led British Australian New Zealand Research Expedition (BANZARE) and the contest to claim Antarctic territory ahead of Norway. Norwegian versions of this contest, by Bjarne Aagaard and Hans Bogen, were critical of Mawson and Australia’s claim to a sector of Antarctica west to 45o E. By investigating the historical drivers that led Norway and Britain to the contest, this thesis establishes, through the consideration of official documents, the reasons for it and whether or not Australian Antarctica was won fairly. Norway’s inexperience in diplomacy and foreign affairs, after gaining independence from Sweden in 1905, alerted Britain to the value of whaling in the Antarctic region and resulted in Britain annexing territory to create the Falkland Islands Dependencies and the Ross Dependency. As he was restricted by British whaling regulations, the Norwegian whaling magnate Lars Christensen sought territory free of British control. This led to Norway claiming Bouvet Island which the British believed was theirs. Britain, with the stated desire to include the whole of Antarctica in the British Empire, formulated processes to achieve this in Eastern Antarctica at the 1926 Imperial Conference in London. The process was specifically developed to thwart attempts by other nations to claim the same territory. This was achieved by omitting vital geographic coordinates from the published conference summary, an omission that favoured the BANZARE in proclaiming territory from 45o E to 160o E for Britain. To remove a possible Norwegian challenge for the territory, Britain agreed to relinquish its claim to Bouvet Island in return for Norwegian recognition of British hegemony in Antarctica. Thesis Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Bouvet Island Ross Dependency University of Tasmania: UTas ePrints Antarctic The Antarctic Norway New Zealand Christensen ENVELOPE(47.867,47.867,-67.967,-67.967) Bouvet ENVELOPE(3.358,3.358,-54.422,-54.422) Bouvet Island ENVELOPE(3.358,3.358,-54.422,-54.422) Ross Dependency ENVELOPE(160.000,160.000,-60.000,-60.000) Bogen ENVELOPE(13.109,13.109,66.324,66.324) Aagaard ENVELOPE(-64.517,-64.517,-66.783,-66.783) Lars Christensen ENVELOPE(-90.517,-90.517,-68.817,-68.817)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tasmania: UTas ePrints
op_collection_id ftunivtasmania
language English
description The Winning of Australian Antarctica (A. Grenfell Price) described the Douglas Mawson led British Australian New Zealand Research Expedition (BANZARE) and the contest to claim Antarctic territory ahead of Norway. Norwegian versions of this contest, by Bjarne Aagaard and Hans Bogen, were critical of Mawson and Australia’s claim to a sector of Antarctica west to 45o E. By investigating the historical drivers that led Norway and Britain to the contest, this thesis establishes, through the consideration of official documents, the reasons for it and whether or not Australian Antarctica was won fairly. Norway’s inexperience in diplomacy and foreign affairs, after gaining independence from Sweden in 1905, alerted Britain to the value of whaling in the Antarctic region and resulted in Britain annexing territory to create the Falkland Islands Dependencies and the Ross Dependency. As he was restricted by British whaling regulations, the Norwegian whaling magnate Lars Christensen sought territory free of British control. This led to Norway claiming Bouvet Island which the British believed was theirs. Britain, with the stated desire to include the whole of Antarctica in the British Empire, formulated processes to achieve this in Eastern Antarctica at the 1926 Imperial Conference in London. The process was specifically developed to thwart attempts by other nations to claim the same territory. This was achieved by omitting vital geographic coordinates from the published conference summary, an omission that favoured the BANZARE in proclaiming territory from 45o E to 160o E for Britain. To remove a possible Norwegian challenge for the territory, Britain agreed to relinquish its claim to Bouvet Island in return for Norwegian recognition of British hegemony in Antarctica.
format Thesis
author Barrett, ND
spellingShingle Barrett, ND
Was Australian Antarctica Won Fairly?
author_facet Barrett, ND
author_sort Barrett, ND
title Was Australian Antarctica Won Fairly?
title_short Was Australian Antarctica Won Fairly?
title_full Was Australian Antarctica Won Fairly?
title_fullStr Was Australian Antarctica Won Fairly?
title_full_unstemmed Was Australian Antarctica Won Fairly?
title_sort was australian antarctica won fairly?
publishDate 2007
url https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/
https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/1/01-_Was_Australian_Antarctica_Won_Fairly_-e_version.pdf
https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/2/02-_Was_Australian_Antarctica_Won_Fairly-e_version.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(47.867,47.867,-67.967,-67.967)
ENVELOPE(3.358,3.358,-54.422,-54.422)
ENVELOPE(3.358,3.358,-54.422,-54.422)
ENVELOPE(160.000,160.000,-60.000,-60.000)
ENVELOPE(13.109,13.109,66.324,66.324)
ENVELOPE(-64.517,-64.517,-66.783,-66.783)
ENVELOPE(-90.517,-90.517,-68.817,-68.817)
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
Norway
New Zealand
Christensen
Bouvet
Bouvet Island
Ross Dependency
Bogen
Aagaard
Lars Christensen
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
Norway
New Zealand
Christensen
Bouvet
Bouvet Island
Ross Dependency
Bogen
Aagaard
Lars Christensen
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Bouvet Island
Ross Dependency
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Bouvet Island
Ross Dependency
op_relation https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/1/01-_Was_Australian_Antarctica_Won_Fairly_-e_version.pdf
https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7732/2/02-_Was_Australian_Antarctica_Won_Fairly-e_version.pdf
Barrett, ND 2007 , 'Was Australian Antarctica Won Fairly?', Honours thesis, University of Tasmania.
op_rights cc_utas
_version_ 1766083851640111104