Independent expeditions and Antarctic tourism policy

Discussions about the management of non-governmental activities in Antarctica have been handicapped by a lack of clarity in terminology. The term ‘tourism,’ for example, is used in a catch-all manner to describe activities as widely divergent and incommensurable as overflights by commercial jetliner...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar Record
Main Authors: Murray, C, Jabour, J
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7624/
https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7624/1/Carl%5B1%5D.Murray,_Article_3.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247404003791
id ftunivtasmania:oai:eprints.utas.edu.au:7624
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasmania:oai:eprints.utas.edu.au:7624 2023-05-15T13:36:46+02:00 Independent expeditions and Antarctic tourism policy Murray, C Jabour, J 2004 application/pdf https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7624/ https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7624/1/Carl%5B1%5D.Murray,_Article_3.pdf https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247404003791 en eng https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7624/1/Carl%5B1%5D.Murray,_Article_3.pdf Murray, C and Jabour, J 2004 , 'Independent expeditions and Antarctic tourism policy' , Polar Record, vol. 40, no. 215 , pp. 309-317 , doi:10.1017/S0032247404003791 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0032247404003791>. Article PeerReviewed 2004 ftunivtasmania https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247404003791 2020-05-30T07:21:22Z Discussions about the management of non-governmental activities in Antarctica have been handicapped by a lack of clarity in terminology. The term ‘tourism,’ for example, is used in a catch-all manner to describe activities as widely divergent and incommensurable as overflights by commercial jetliners and solo ski traverses of the ice cap. Recent debate about stricter regulation of independent expeditions has been similarly confused. This paper examines these definitional hurdles and offers a broad categorization of activities inAntarctica. An overviewof recent independent expeditions is then given and issues are discussed. It is suggested that, to date, the terms of the debate have been set by the most powerful vested interests in Antarctica and that the discussion itself has been polarized. The paper does not prescribe policy but indicates alternative points of view and argues that the strict regulatory approach increasingly favoured by some national programs is out of all proportion to the size of potential problems and could diminish traditions of cooperation, non-proprietorship, and the adventurous spirit, which have uniquely characterized human endeavour in Antarctica. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Ice cap Polar Record University of Tasmania: UTas ePrints Antarctic Endeavour ENVELOPE(162.000,162.000,-76.550,-76.550) Polar Record 40 4 309 317
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tasmania: UTas ePrints
op_collection_id ftunivtasmania
language English
description Discussions about the management of non-governmental activities in Antarctica have been handicapped by a lack of clarity in terminology. The term ‘tourism,’ for example, is used in a catch-all manner to describe activities as widely divergent and incommensurable as overflights by commercial jetliners and solo ski traverses of the ice cap. Recent debate about stricter regulation of independent expeditions has been similarly confused. This paper examines these definitional hurdles and offers a broad categorization of activities inAntarctica. An overviewof recent independent expeditions is then given and issues are discussed. It is suggested that, to date, the terms of the debate have been set by the most powerful vested interests in Antarctica and that the discussion itself has been polarized. The paper does not prescribe policy but indicates alternative points of view and argues that the strict regulatory approach increasingly favoured by some national programs is out of all proportion to the size of potential problems and could diminish traditions of cooperation, non-proprietorship, and the adventurous spirit, which have uniquely characterized human endeavour in Antarctica.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Murray, C
Jabour, J
spellingShingle Murray, C
Jabour, J
Independent expeditions and Antarctic tourism policy
author_facet Murray, C
Jabour, J
author_sort Murray, C
title Independent expeditions and Antarctic tourism policy
title_short Independent expeditions and Antarctic tourism policy
title_full Independent expeditions and Antarctic tourism policy
title_fullStr Independent expeditions and Antarctic tourism policy
title_full_unstemmed Independent expeditions and Antarctic tourism policy
title_sort independent expeditions and antarctic tourism policy
publishDate 2004
url https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7624/
https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7624/1/Carl%5B1%5D.Murray,_Article_3.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247404003791
long_lat ENVELOPE(162.000,162.000,-76.550,-76.550)
geographic Antarctic
Endeavour
geographic_facet Antarctic
Endeavour
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Ice cap
Polar Record
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Ice cap
Polar Record
op_relation https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7624/1/Carl%5B1%5D.Murray,_Article_3.pdf
Murray, C and Jabour, J 2004 , 'Independent expeditions and Antarctic tourism policy' , Polar Record, vol. 40, no. 215 , pp. 309-317 , doi:10.1017/S0032247404003791 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0032247404003791>.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247404003791
container_title Polar Record
container_volume 40
container_issue 4
container_start_page 309
op_container_end_page 317
_version_ 1766083847749894144