From the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals

Estimation of the age of individuals is a fundamental parameter for understanding the biology of individuals and ecology of populations. Incremental growth deposits in tooth dentine or cementum, known as growth layer groups (GLGs), have been used to estimate the age of toothed marine mammals (odonto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Mammal Science
Main Authors: Hamilton, V, Evans, K, Hindell, M
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Soc Marine Mammalogy 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.utas.edu.au/44625/
https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12392
id ftunivtasmania:oai:eprints.utas.edu.au:44625
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasmania:oai:eprints.utas.edu.au:44625 2023-05-15T18:26:46+02:00 From the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals Hamilton, V Evans, K Hindell, M 2017 https://eprints.utas.edu.au/44625/ https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12392 unknown Soc Marine Mammalogy Hamilton, V, Evans, K and Hindell, M orcid:0000-0002-7823-7185 2017 , 'From the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals' , Marine Mammal Science, vol. 33, no. 3 , pp. 880-888 , doi:10.1111/mms.12392 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mms.12392>. growth layer group (GLG) accessory layer sperm whale crossdating Article PeerReviewed 2017 ftunivtasmania https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12392 2022-02-28T23:17:24Z Estimation of the age of individuals is a fundamental parameter for understanding the biology of individuals and ecology of populations. Incremental growth deposits in tooth dentine or cementum, known as growth layer groups (GLGs), have been used to estimate the age of toothed marine mammals (odontocetes, pinnipeds) since the 1950s (Scheffer and Myrick 1980). In most species, it is assumed that GLGs are deposited annually (Hohn 2009). Validation of this assumption has only been possible in a small number of marine mammal species (e.g., Bowen et al. 1983, Myrick et al. 1984, Hohn et al. 1989, Lockyer 1993, Oosthuizen 1997), due to impracticalities in obtaining validated ages (Evans et al. 2002, Hohn 2009). For species in which validation of age is not possible, absolute age or the accuracy of age estimates cannot be confirmed (Campana 2001). Further, the precision of estimates (i.e., the closeness of repeat counts from an individual tooth) may not necessarily reflect the best estimate of age and, at present, an objective method to assist with identification of GLGs for age estimation purposes has not been established (Evans et al. 2002, Campana and Stewart 2014). Article in Journal/Newspaper Sperm whale University of Tasmania: UTas ePrints Lockyer ENVELOPE(-57.599,-57.599,-64.447,-64.447) Marine Mammal Science 33 3 880 888
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tasmania: UTas ePrints
op_collection_id ftunivtasmania
language unknown
topic growth layer group (GLG)
accessory layer
sperm whale
crossdating
spellingShingle growth layer group (GLG)
accessory layer
sperm whale
crossdating
Hamilton, V
Evans, K
Hindell, M
From the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals
topic_facet growth layer group (GLG)
accessory layer
sperm whale
crossdating
description Estimation of the age of individuals is a fundamental parameter for understanding the biology of individuals and ecology of populations. Incremental growth deposits in tooth dentine or cementum, known as growth layer groups (GLGs), have been used to estimate the age of toothed marine mammals (odontocetes, pinnipeds) since the 1950s (Scheffer and Myrick 1980). In most species, it is assumed that GLGs are deposited annually (Hohn 2009). Validation of this assumption has only been possible in a small number of marine mammal species (e.g., Bowen et al. 1983, Myrick et al. 1984, Hohn et al. 1989, Lockyer 1993, Oosthuizen 1997), due to impracticalities in obtaining validated ages (Evans et al. 2002, Hohn 2009). For species in which validation of age is not possible, absolute age or the accuracy of age estimates cannot be confirmed (Campana 2001). Further, the precision of estimates (i.e., the closeness of repeat counts from an individual tooth) may not necessarily reflect the best estimate of age and, at present, an objective method to assist with identification of GLGs for age estimation purposes has not been established (Evans et al. 2002, Campana and Stewart 2014).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hamilton, V
Evans, K
Hindell, M
author_facet Hamilton, V
Evans, K
Hindell, M
author_sort Hamilton, V
title From the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals
title_short From the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals
title_full From the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals
title_fullStr From the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals
title_full_unstemmed From the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals
title_sort from the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals
publisher Soc Marine Mammalogy
publishDate 2017
url https://eprints.utas.edu.au/44625/
https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12392
long_lat ENVELOPE(-57.599,-57.599,-64.447,-64.447)
geographic Lockyer
geographic_facet Lockyer
genre Sperm whale
genre_facet Sperm whale
op_relation Hamilton, V, Evans, K and Hindell, M orcid:0000-0002-7823-7185 2017 , 'From the forests to teeth: visual crossdating to refine age estimates in marine mammals' , Marine Mammal Science, vol. 33, no. 3 , pp. 880-888 , doi:10.1111/mms.12392 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mms.12392>.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12392
container_title Marine Mammal Science
container_volume 33
container_issue 3
container_start_page 880
op_container_end_page 888
_version_ 1766208738370256896