Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya–East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): A petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?

An ultrabasic/ultramafic composition of kimberlite magmas is difficult to reconcile with existing models of the kimberlite mantle source and melting conditions, inferred magma temperatures and rheological properties, and the style of magma ascent and emplacement. The inconsistencies in current think...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lithos
Main Authors: Kamenetsky, VS, Kamenetsky, MB, Golovin, AV, Sharygin, VV, Maas, R
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.utas.edu.au/15233/
https://eprints.utas.edu.au/15233/1/Lithos2012_UV.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.04.032
id ftunivtasmania:oai:eprints.utas.edu.au:15233
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasmania:oai:eprints.utas.edu.au:15233 2023-05-15T18:45:09+02:00 Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya–East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): A petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery? Kamenetsky, VS Kamenetsky, MB Golovin, AV Sharygin, VV Maas, R 2012-10 application/pdf https://eprints.utas.edu.au/15233/ https://eprints.utas.edu.au/15233/1/Lithos2012_UV.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.04.032 en eng https://eprints.utas.edu.au/15233/1/Lithos2012_UV.pdf Kamenetsky, VS, Kamenetsky, MB, Golovin, AV, Sharygin, VV and Maas, R 2012 , 'Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya–East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): A petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?' , Lithos, vol. 152 , pp. 173-186 , doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2012.04.032 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.04.032>. cc_utas Kimberlite Olivine Primary melt Carbonate Geochemistry Stable isotopes Article PeerReviewed 2012 ftunivtasmania https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.04.032 2020-05-30T07:29:05Z An ultrabasic/ultramafic composition of kimberlite magmas is difficult to reconcile with existing models of the kimberlite mantle source and melting conditions, inferred magma temperatures and rheological properties, and the style of magma ascent and emplacement. The inconsistencies in current thinking indicate serious flaws in understanding kimberlite magma compositions. Much of the uncertainty over true kimberlite compositions may stem from almost ubiquitous hydration and leaching of kimberlite rocks. This study presents petrographic and geochemical data for kimberlite samples largely unaffected by postmagmatic modification, from the Devonian Udachnaya–East pipe in Siberia. These samples are unusually enriched in chlorine and sodium, yet they are essentially anhydrous. These features are consistent with the phase composition of the groundmass which is dominated by minerals such as Na-Ca carbonates, Na–K chlorides and sulphates which appear to be – in our samples – co-magmatic with common silicates and oxides, but are unknown in other kimberlites, or rarely found within magmatic assemblages. We suggest that a kimberlite parent melt of essentially non-silicate composition, with high concentrations of alkalis, CO2 and Cl may be a viable alternative to the currently favoured water-rich, high-Mg model primary melt. Entrainment of mantle silicates into such a melt en route to the surface, followed by gravitational accumulation of mantle olivine and liquidus oxides (perovskite, Cr-spinel) at the bottom of vertically extensive magma bodies after emplacement, would explain the observed properties of kimberlite magma/rock, notably enrichment in olivine and trace elements in the hypabyssal kimberlite facies. A carbonate melt composition would retain attributes of the standard model such as trace element enrichment via low degrees of partial melting, it would explain low temperatures of crystallisation and the exceptional rheological properties that enable kimberlite primary melts to segregate from the lithospheric source and buoyantly ascend at high speed, while mixing and reacting with country rocks. Article in Journal/Newspaper Yakutia Siberia University of Tasmania: UTas ePrints Lithos 152 173 186
institution Open Polar
collection University of Tasmania: UTas ePrints
op_collection_id ftunivtasmania
language English
topic Kimberlite
Olivine
Primary melt
Carbonate
Geochemistry
Stable isotopes
spellingShingle Kimberlite
Olivine
Primary melt
Carbonate
Geochemistry
Stable isotopes
Kamenetsky, VS
Kamenetsky, MB
Golovin, AV
Sharygin, VV
Maas, R
Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya–East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): A petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?
topic_facet Kimberlite
Olivine
Primary melt
Carbonate
Geochemistry
Stable isotopes
description An ultrabasic/ultramafic composition of kimberlite magmas is difficult to reconcile with existing models of the kimberlite mantle source and melting conditions, inferred magma temperatures and rheological properties, and the style of magma ascent and emplacement. The inconsistencies in current thinking indicate serious flaws in understanding kimberlite magma compositions. Much of the uncertainty over true kimberlite compositions may stem from almost ubiquitous hydration and leaching of kimberlite rocks. This study presents petrographic and geochemical data for kimberlite samples largely unaffected by postmagmatic modification, from the Devonian Udachnaya–East pipe in Siberia. These samples are unusually enriched in chlorine and sodium, yet they are essentially anhydrous. These features are consistent with the phase composition of the groundmass which is dominated by minerals such as Na-Ca carbonates, Na–K chlorides and sulphates which appear to be – in our samples – co-magmatic with common silicates and oxides, but are unknown in other kimberlites, or rarely found within magmatic assemblages. We suggest that a kimberlite parent melt of essentially non-silicate composition, with high concentrations of alkalis, CO2 and Cl may be a viable alternative to the currently favoured water-rich, high-Mg model primary melt. Entrainment of mantle silicates into such a melt en route to the surface, followed by gravitational accumulation of mantle olivine and liquidus oxides (perovskite, Cr-spinel) at the bottom of vertically extensive magma bodies after emplacement, would explain the observed properties of kimberlite magma/rock, notably enrichment in olivine and trace elements in the hypabyssal kimberlite facies. A carbonate melt composition would retain attributes of the standard model such as trace element enrichment via low degrees of partial melting, it would explain low temperatures of crystallisation and the exceptional rheological properties that enable kimberlite primary melts to segregate from the lithospheric source and buoyantly ascend at high speed, while mixing and reacting with country rocks.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kamenetsky, VS
Kamenetsky, MB
Golovin, AV
Sharygin, VV
Maas, R
author_facet Kamenetsky, VS
Kamenetsky, MB
Golovin, AV
Sharygin, VV
Maas, R
author_sort Kamenetsky, VS
title Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya–East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): A petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?
title_short Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya–East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): A petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?
title_full Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya–East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): A petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?
title_fullStr Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya–East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): A petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?
title_full_unstemmed Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya–East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): A petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?
title_sort ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the udachnaya–east pipe (yakutia, russia): a petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?
publishDate 2012
url https://eprints.utas.edu.au/15233/
https://eprints.utas.edu.au/15233/1/Lithos2012_UV.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.04.032
genre Yakutia
Siberia
genre_facet Yakutia
Siberia
op_relation https://eprints.utas.edu.au/15233/1/Lithos2012_UV.pdf
Kamenetsky, VS, Kamenetsky, MB, Golovin, AV, Sharygin, VV and Maas, R 2012 , 'Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya–East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): A petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?' , Lithos, vol. 152 , pp. 173-186 , doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2012.04.032 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.04.032>.
op_rights cc_utas
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2012.04.032
container_title Lithos
container_volume 152
container_start_page 173
op_container_end_page 186
_version_ 1766236116792377344