Geologic and kinematic constraints on Late Cretaceous to mid Eocene plate boundaries in the southwest Pacific

Starkly contrasting tectonic reconstructions have been proposed for the Late Cretaceous to mid Eocene (~ 85-45 Ma) evolution of the southwest Pacific, reflecting sparse and ambiguous data. Furthermore, uncertainty in the timing of and motion at plate boundaries in the region has led to controversy a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthews, KJ, Williams, SE, Joanne Whittaker, Muller, RD, Seton, M, Clarke, GL
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Geologic_and_kinematic_constraints_on_Late_Cretaceous_to_mid_Eocene_plate_boundaries_in_the_southwest_Pacific/22918481
Description
Summary:Starkly contrasting tectonic reconstructions have been proposed for the Late Cretaceous to mid Eocene (~ 85-45 Ma) evolution of the southwest Pacific, reflecting sparse and ambiguous data. Furthermore, uncertainty in the timing of and motion at plate boundaries in the region has led to controversy around how to implement a robust southwest Pacific plate circuit. It is agreed that the southwest Pacific comprised three spreading ridges during this time: in the Southeast Indian Ocean, Tasman Sea and Amundsen Sea. However, one and possibly two other plate boundaries also accommodated relative plate motions: in the West Antarctic Rift System (WARS) and between the Lord Howe Rise (LHR) and Pacific. Relevant geologic and kinematic data from the region are reviewed to better constrain its plate motion history during this period, and determine the time-dependent evolution of the southwest Pacific regional plate circuit. A model of (1) west-dipping subduction and basin opening to the east of the LHR from 85-55 Ma, and (2) initiation of northeast-dipping subduction and basin closure east of New Caledonia at ~ 55 Ma is supported. West-dipping subduction and basin opening were not driven by convergence, as has previously been proposed. Our plate circuit analysis suggests that between at least 74 Ma and subduction initiation at ~ 55 Ma there was little net relative motion between the Pacific plate and LHR, < 20 km of convergence with a component of strike-slip motion. Subduction must therefore have been primarily driven by the negative buoyancy of the slab, or perhaps forced trench retreat due to orogenic collapse. We propose that at least two plate boundaries separated the Pacific plate from the LHR during this time, however, as there was little to no motion between these plates then a plate circuit which treats the Pacific plate and LHR as a single plate (“Australian” circuit) will produce similar kinematic results to a circuit which leaves their relative motion unconstrained and treats them as separate plates ...