Comparing King, Gentoo and Royal Penguin Responses to Pedestrian Visitation

For wildlife managers, determining inter-species differences in the behavioral responses of seabirds to visitation can allow greater efficacy of visitor guidelines. Two key management outcomes for such information include 1) tailoring visitor guidelines to protect the most sensitive species and 2) i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Holmes, ND
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Comparing_King_Gentoo_and_Royal_Penguin_Responses_to_Pedestrian_Visitation/22859426
_version_ 1826779748370481152
author Holmes, ND
author_facet Holmes, ND
author_sort Holmes, ND
collection Research from University Of Tasmania
description For wildlife managers, determining inter-species differences in the behavioral responses of seabirds to visitation can allow greater efficacy of visitor guidelines. Two key management outcomes for such information include 1) tailoring visitor guidelines to protect the most sensitive species and 2) improving self-regulation during visits by identifying behaviors likely to indicate a change in the natural activity of visited species. On subantarctic Macquarie Island, Australia, I collected the behavioral responses of guarding king (Aptenodytes patagonicus), gentoo (Pygoscelis papua), and royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) penguins before, during, and after exposure to a standardized pedestrian visit, to compare species' behavioral responses to visitation. Gentoo penguins appeared more sensitive than royal or king penguins, exhibiting altered behavior for 5 minutes after the stimulus was removed; this pattern was not evident in kings or royals. Response behaviors useful for visitors to assess their impact on penguins include vigilance (repeated rapid head turning) in all 3 species, agonism in king and royal penguins (reaching and striking at conspecifics), and low threat-display (bill pointing) in gentoo penguins. This study is valuable for wildlife managers as it provides practical information in the application of on-ground visitor guidelines.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre King Penguins
Macquarie Island
Pygoscelis papua
genre_facet King Penguins
Macquarie Island
Pygoscelis papua
id ftunivtasmanfig:oai:figshare.com:article/22859426
institution Open Polar
language unknown
op_collection_id ftunivtasmanfig
op_relation 102.100.100/590885
https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Comparing_King_Gentoo_and_Royal_Penguin_Responses_to_Pedestrian_Visitation/22859426
op_rights In Copyright
publishDate 2007
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasmanfig:oai:figshare.com:article/22859426 2025-03-16T15:29:48+00:00 Comparing King, Gentoo and Royal Penguin Responses to Pedestrian Visitation Holmes, ND 2007-01-01T00:00:00Z https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Comparing_King_Gentoo_and_Royal_Penguin_Responses_to_Pedestrian_Visitation/22859426 unknown 102.100.100/590885 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Comparing_King_Gentoo_and_Royal_Penguin_Responses_to_Pedestrian_Visitation/22859426 In Copyright Wildlife and habitat management No keyword provided Text Journal contribution 2007 ftunivtasmanfig 2025-02-17T09:48:19Z For wildlife managers, determining inter-species differences in the behavioral responses of seabirds to visitation can allow greater efficacy of visitor guidelines. Two key management outcomes for such information include 1) tailoring visitor guidelines to protect the most sensitive species and 2) improving self-regulation during visits by identifying behaviors likely to indicate a change in the natural activity of visited species. On subantarctic Macquarie Island, Australia, I collected the behavioral responses of guarding king (Aptenodytes patagonicus), gentoo (Pygoscelis papua), and royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) penguins before, during, and after exposure to a standardized pedestrian visit, to compare species' behavioral responses to visitation. Gentoo penguins appeared more sensitive than royal or king penguins, exhibiting altered behavior for 5 minutes after the stimulus was removed; this pattern was not evident in kings or royals. Response behaviors useful for visitors to assess their impact on penguins include vigilance (repeated rapid head turning) in all 3 species, agonism in king and royal penguins (reaching and striking at conspecifics), and low threat-display (bill pointing) in gentoo penguins. This study is valuable for wildlife managers as it provides practical information in the application of on-ground visitor guidelines. Article in Journal/Newspaper King Penguins Macquarie Island Pygoscelis papua Research from University Of Tasmania
spellingShingle Wildlife and habitat management
No keyword provided
Holmes, ND
Comparing King, Gentoo and Royal Penguin Responses to Pedestrian Visitation
title Comparing King, Gentoo and Royal Penguin Responses to Pedestrian Visitation
title_full Comparing King, Gentoo and Royal Penguin Responses to Pedestrian Visitation
title_fullStr Comparing King, Gentoo and Royal Penguin Responses to Pedestrian Visitation
title_full_unstemmed Comparing King, Gentoo and Royal Penguin Responses to Pedestrian Visitation
title_short Comparing King, Gentoo and Royal Penguin Responses to Pedestrian Visitation
title_sort comparing king, gentoo and royal penguin responses to pedestrian visitation
topic Wildlife and habitat management
No keyword provided
topic_facet Wildlife and habitat management
No keyword provided
url https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Comparing_King_Gentoo_and_Royal_Penguin_Responses_to_Pedestrian_Visitation/22859426