Separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response

Critical commentary about the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) has includedthe claim that the media presented a simplistic and stereotyped image of Aboriginal communitiesat the time of its introduction in 2007, but to date there has been no systematic analysis to supportthis. This study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Sociology
Main Authors: Proudfoot, F, Habibis, D
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Sage Publications Ltd. 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/92974
id ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:92974
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:92974 2023-05-15T16:16:22+02:00 Separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response Proudfoot, F Habibis, D 2013 https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/92974 en eng Sage Publications Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368 Proudfoot, F and Habibis, D, Separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response, Journal of Sociology, 51, (2) pp. 170-188. ISSN 1440-7833 (2013) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/92974 Studies in Human Society Sociology Social Theory Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2013 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368 2019-12-13T21:55:52Z Critical commentary about the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) has includedthe claim that the media presented a simplistic and stereotyped image of Aboriginal communitiesat the time of its introduction in 2007, but to date there has been no systematic analysis to supportthis. This study addresses this research gap through a critical discourse analysis of reportage of theNTER in mainstream and Aboriginal populist print media. The findings reveal major differencesin these accounts, with radically different propositions and normative assumptions. Mainstreammedia were overwhelmingly negative in their portrayal of remote Aboriginal communities, weresilent about Aboriginal resistance and portrayed urgent Commonwealth intervention as necessaryand heroic. The Aboriginal media provided contextualised accounts of the issues and focusedintensely on the human rights implications of the intervention. The findings reveal a concerningracialised divide in representations of the issues facing remote Aboriginal communities in 2007that helps to explain why the Australian public accepted policies that discriminated againstAustralias First Nations peoples. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) Journal of Sociology 51 2 170 188
institution Open Polar
collection eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania)
op_collection_id ftunivtasecite
language English
topic Studies in Human Society
Sociology
Social Theory
spellingShingle Studies in Human Society
Sociology
Social Theory
Proudfoot, F
Habibis, D
Separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response
topic_facet Studies in Human Society
Sociology
Social Theory
description Critical commentary about the Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) has includedthe claim that the media presented a simplistic and stereotyped image of Aboriginal communitiesat the time of its introduction in 2007, but to date there has been no systematic analysis to supportthis. This study addresses this research gap through a critical discourse analysis of reportage of theNTER in mainstream and Aboriginal populist print media. The findings reveal major differencesin these accounts, with radically different propositions and normative assumptions. Mainstreammedia were overwhelmingly negative in their portrayal of remote Aboriginal communities, weresilent about Aboriginal resistance and portrayed urgent Commonwealth intervention as necessaryand heroic. The Aboriginal media provided contextualised accounts of the issues and focusedintensely on the human rights implications of the intervention. The findings reveal a concerningracialised divide in representations of the issues facing remote Aboriginal communities in 2007that helps to explain why the Australian public accepted policies that discriminated againstAustralias First Nations peoples.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Proudfoot, F
Habibis, D
author_facet Proudfoot, F
Habibis, D
author_sort Proudfoot, F
title Separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response
title_short Separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response
title_full Separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response
title_fullStr Separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response
title_full_unstemmed Separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response
title_sort separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and aboriginal populist media accounts of the northern territory emergency response
publisher Sage Publications Ltd.
publishDate 2013
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/92974
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368
Proudfoot, F and Habibis, D, Separate worlds: a discourse analysis of mainstream and Aboriginal populist media accounts of the Northern Territory Emergency Response, Journal of Sociology, 51, (2) pp. 170-188. ISSN 1440-7833 (2013) [Refereed Article]
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/92974
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313482368
container_title Journal of Sociology
container_volume 51
container_issue 2
container_start_page 170
op_container_end_page 188
_version_ 1766002226083397632