Skeletal malformations in Australian marine finfish hatcheries

The Australian finfish aquaculture industry has a target to more than treble production from 2005 to100,000 t p.a. by 2015. Most of the current production is from sea cage culture of Salmo salar and Thunnusmaccoyii but new and emerging species are predicted to have a faster increase in production an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquaculture
Main Authors: Cobcroft, JM, Battaglene, SC
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Science Bv 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.027
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/84149
id ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:84149
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:84149 2023-05-15T18:09:54+02:00 Skeletal malformations in Australian marine finfish hatcheries Cobcroft, JM Battaglene, SC 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.027 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/84149 en eng Elsevier Science Bv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.027 Cobcroft, JM and Battaglene, SC, Skeletal malformations in Australian marine finfish hatcheries, Aquaculture, 396-399 pp. 51-58. ISSN 0044-8486 (2013) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/84149 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences Fisheries Sciences Aquaculture Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2013 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.027 2019-12-13T21:48:38Z The Australian finfish aquaculture industry has a target to more than treble production from 2005 to100,000 t p.a. by 2015. Most of the current production is from sea cage culture of Salmo salar and Thunnusmaccoyii but new and emerging species are predicted to have a faster increase in production and were thefocus of this study. The quantity and quality of hatchery-produced fingerlings is an impediment to achievinggrowth in the marine finfish sector. A survey of 18 hatcheries revealed that 44% indicated skeletalmalformations were a significant issue in hatchery production, and 89% reported variability in malformationrates between production batches. Samples of fish from selected hatcheries were cleared and stained forassessment of abnormal bone development. Two hatcheries that had indicated malformations were not asignificant problem submitted samples with >5% severe malformations. Jaw and spinal malformationsoccurred in Lates calcarifer, Seriola lalandi, Epinephelus fuscoguttatus, E. coioides, and Latris lineata. To thebest of our knowledge, causative factors of malformations in Australian hatcheries have only been identifiedfor jaw malformation in Lates calcarifer and Latris lineata, and further research is either needed or underwaywith other species and malformation types in order to improve culture protocols and increase fingerlingquality. Improved monitoring techniques for skeletal malformations would substantially enhance the comparisonof production methods at a commercial scale and enhance research efforts. Article in Journal/Newspaper Salmo salar eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) Aquaculture 396-399 51 58
institution Open Polar
collection eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania)
op_collection_id ftunivtasecite
language English
topic Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
Fisheries Sciences
Aquaculture
spellingShingle Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
Fisheries Sciences
Aquaculture
Cobcroft, JM
Battaglene, SC
Skeletal malformations in Australian marine finfish hatcheries
topic_facet Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
Fisheries Sciences
Aquaculture
description The Australian finfish aquaculture industry has a target to more than treble production from 2005 to100,000 t p.a. by 2015. Most of the current production is from sea cage culture of Salmo salar and Thunnusmaccoyii but new and emerging species are predicted to have a faster increase in production and were thefocus of this study. The quantity and quality of hatchery-produced fingerlings is an impediment to achievinggrowth in the marine finfish sector. A survey of 18 hatcheries revealed that 44% indicated skeletalmalformations were a significant issue in hatchery production, and 89% reported variability in malformationrates between production batches. Samples of fish from selected hatcheries were cleared and stained forassessment of abnormal bone development. Two hatcheries that had indicated malformations were not asignificant problem submitted samples with >5% severe malformations. Jaw and spinal malformationsoccurred in Lates calcarifer, Seriola lalandi, Epinephelus fuscoguttatus, E. coioides, and Latris lineata. To thebest of our knowledge, causative factors of malformations in Australian hatcheries have only been identifiedfor jaw malformation in Lates calcarifer and Latris lineata, and further research is either needed or underwaywith other species and malformation types in order to improve culture protocols and increase fingerlingquality. Improved monitoring techniques for skeletal malformations would substantially enhance the comparisonof production methods at a commercial scale and enhance research efforts.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cobcroft, JM
Battaglene, SC
author_facet Cobcroft, JM
Battaglene, SC
author_sort Cobcroft, JM
title Skeletal malformations in Australian marine finfish hatcheries
title_short Skeletal malformations in Australian marine finfish hatcheries
title_full Skeletal malformations in Australian marine finfish hatcheries
title_fullStr Skeletal malformations in Australian marine finfish hatcheries
title_full_unstemmed Skeletal malformations in Australian marine finfish hatcheries
title_sort skeletal malformations in australian marine finfish hatcheries
publisher Elsevier Science Bv
publishDate 2013
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.027
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/84149
genre Salmo salar
genre_facet Salmo salar
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.027
Cobcroft, JM and Battaglene, SC, Skeletal malformations in Australian marine finfish hatcheries, Aquaculture, 396-399 pp. 51-58. ISSN 0044-8486 (2013) [Refereed Article]
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/84149
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.027
container_title Aquaculture
container_volume 396-399
container_start_page 51
op_container_end_page 58
_version_ 1766182595320610816