How unique is the Udachnaya-East kimberlite? Comparison with kimberlites from the Slave Craton (Canada) and SW Greenland

The origin of alkali carbonates and chlorides in the groundmass of unaltered Udachnaya-East kimberlites in Siberia is still controversial. Contrary to existing dogma that the Udachnaya-East kimberlite was either contaminated by the crustal sediments or platform brines, magmatic origin of the groundm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lithos
Main Authors: Kamenetsky, VS, Kamenetsky, MB, Weiss, Y, Navon, O, Nielsen, TFD, Mernagh, TP
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Science Bv 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.03.032
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/61731
id ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:61731
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:61731 2023-05-15T16:29:24+02:00 How unique is the Udachnaya-East kimberlite? Comparison with kimberlites from the Slave Craton (Canada) and SW Greenland Kamenetsky, VS Kamenetsky, MB Weiss, Y Navon, O Nielsen, TFD Mernagh, TP 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.03.032 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/61731 en eng Elsevier Science Bv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.03.032 Kamenetsky, VS and Kamenetsky, MB and Weiss, Y and Navon, O and Nielsen, TFD and Mernagh, TP, How unique is the Udachnaya-East kimberlite? Comparison with kimberlites from the Slave Craton (Canada) and SW Greenland, Lithos: An International Journal of Mineralogy, Petrology, and Geochemistry, 112, (November) pp. 334-346. ISSN 0024-4937 (2009) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/61731 Earth Sciences Geology Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2009 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.03.032 2019-12-13T21:32:11Z The origin of alkali carbonates and chlorides in the groundmass of unaltered Udachnaya-East kimberlites in Siberia is still controversial. Contrary to existing dogma that the Udachnaya-East kimberlite was either contaminated by the crustal sediments or platform brines, magmatic origin of the groundmass assemblage has been proposed on the basis of melt immiscibility textures, melt inclusion studies, and strontium and neon isotope compositions. We further tested the idea of alkali- and chlorine enrichment of the kimberlite parental melt by studying olivine-hosted melt inclusions and secondary serpentine in kimberlites from the Slave Craton, Canada (Gahcho Kue, Jericho, Aaron and Leslie pipes) and southern West Greenland (Majuagaa dyke).Host olivine phenocrysts closely resemble groundmass olivine from the Udachnaya-East kimberlite in morphology, compositions (high-Fo, low-Ca), complex zoning with cores of varying shapes and compositions and rims of constant Fo. Melt inclusions in olivine consist of several translucent and opaque daughter phases and vapour bubble(s). The daughter crystals studied in unexposed inclusions by laser Raman spectroscopy and in carefully exposed inclusions by WDS-EDS are represented by Na-K chlorides, calcite, dolomite, magnesite, Ca-Na, Ca-Na-K and Ca-Mg-Ba carbonates, bradleyite Na-3 Mg(CO3)(PO4), K-bearing nahpoite Na-2(HPO4), apatite, phlogopite and tetraferriphlogopite, unidentified sulphates, Fe sulphides, djerfisherite, pyrochlore (Na, Ca)(2)Nb2O6(OH,F), monticellite, Cr-spinel and Fe-Ti oxides. High abundances of Na, K (e.g., (Na + K)/Ca = 0.15-0.85) and incompatible trace elements in the melt inclusions are confirmed by LA-ICPMS analysis of individual inclusions. Heating experiments show that melting of daughter minerals starts and completes at low temperatures (similar to 100 degrees C and 600 degrees C, respectively), further reinforcing the similarity with the Udachnaya-East kimberlite.Serpentine minerals replacing olivine in some of the studied kimberlites demonstrate elevated abundances of chlorine (up to 3-4 wt%), especially in the early generation. Despite heterogeneous distribution of chlorine such abundances are significantly higher than in the serpentine in abyssal and ophiolitic peridotites (<0.5 wt.%). The groundmass of most kimberlites, including those studied here and altered kimberlites from the Udachnaya pipe, contain no alkali carbonates and chlorides and have low Na2O (<0-2 wt.%). We believe that alteration disturbs original melt compositions, with the alkaline elements and chlorine being mostly affected. However, the compositions of melt inclusions and serpentine are indicative of the chemical signature of a parental kimberlite melt. It appears that enrichment in alkalies and chlorine, as seen in unaltered Udachnaya-East kimberlites, is shared by other kimberlites, and thus can be assigned to deep mantle origin. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland Siberia eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) Canada Greenland Lithos 112 334 346
institution Open Polar
collection eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania)
op_collection_id ftunivtasecite
language English
topic Earth Sciences
Geology
Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology
spellingShingle Earth Sciences
Geology
Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology
Kamenetsky, VS
Kamenetsky, MB
Weiss, Y
Navon, O
Nielsen, TFD
Mernagh, TP
How unique is the Udachnaya-East kimberlite? Comparison with kimberlites from the Slave Craton (Canada) and SW Greenland
topic_facet Earth Sciences
Geology
Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology
description The origin of alkali carbonates and chlorides in the groundmass of unaltered Udachnaya-East kimberlites in Siberia is still controversial. Contrary to existing dogma that the Udachnaya-East kimberlite was either contaminated by the crustal sediments or platform brines, magmatic origin of the groundmass assemblage has been proposed on the basis of melt immiscibility textures, melt inclusion studies, and strontium and neon isotope compositions. We further tested the idea of alkali- and chlorine enrichment of the kimberlite parental melt by studying olivine-hosted melt inclusions and secondary serpentine in kimberlites from the Slave Craton, Canada (Gahcho Kue, Jericho, Aaron and Leslie pipes) and southern West Greenland (Majuagaa dyke).Host olivine phenocrysts closely resemble groundmass olivine from the Udachnaya-East kimberlite in morphology, compositions (high-Fo, low-Ca), complex zoning with cores of varying shapes and compositions and rims of constant Fo. Melt inclusions in olivine consist of several translucent and opaque daughter phases and vapour bubble(s). The daughter crystals studied in unexposed inclusions by laser Raman spectroscopy and in carefully exposed inclusions by WDS-EDS are represented by Na-K chlorides, calcite, dolomite, magnesite, Ca-Na, Ca-Na-K and Ca-Mg-Ba carbonates, bradleyite Na-3 Mg(CO3)(PO4), K-bearing nahpoite Na-2(HPO4), apatite, phlogopite and tetraferriphlogopite, unidentified sulphates, Fe sulphides, djerfisherite, pyrochlore (Na, Ca)(2)Nb2O6(OH,F), monticellite, Cr-spinel and Fe-Ti oxides. High abundances of Na, K (e.g., (Na + K)/Ca = 0.15-0.85) and incompatible trace elements in the melt inclusions are confirmed by LA-ICPMS analysis of individual inclusions. Heating experiments show that melting of daughter minerals starts and completes at low temperatures (similar to 100 degrees C and 600 degrees C, respectively), further reinforcing the similarity with the Udachnaya-East kimberlite.Serpentine minerals replacing olivine in some of the studied kimberlites demonstrate elevated abundances of chlorine (up to 3-4 wt%), especially in the early generation. Despite heterogeneous distribution of chlorine such abundances are significantly higher than in the serpentine in abyssal and ophiolitic peridotites (<0.5 wt.%). The groundmass of most kimberlites, including those studied here and altered kimberlites from the Udachnaya pipe, contain no alkali carbonates and chlorides and have low Na2O (<0-2 wt.%). We believe that alteration disturbs original melt compositions, with the alkaline elements and chlorine being mostly affected. However, the compositions of melt inclusions and serpentine are indicative of the chemical signature of a parental kimberlite melt. It appears that enrichment in alkalies and chlorine, as seen in unaltered Udachnaya-East kimberlites, is shared by other kimberlites, and thus can be assigned to deep mantle origin.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kamenetsky, VS
Kamenetsky, MB
Weiss, Y
Navon, O
Nielsen, TFD
Mernagh, TP
author_facet Kamenetsky, VS
Kamenetsky, MB
Weiss, Y
Navon, O
Nielsen, TFD
Mernagh, TP
author_sort Kamenetsky, VS
title How unique is the Udachnaya-East kimberlite? Comparison with kimberlites from the Slave Craton (Canada) and SW Greenland
title_short How unique is the Udachnaya-East kimberlite? Comparison with kimberlites from the Slave Craton (Canada) and SW Greenland
title_full How unique is the Udachnaya-East kimberlite? Comparison with kimberlites from the Slave Craton (Canada) and SW Greenland
title_fullStr How unique is the Udachnaya-East kimberlite? Comparison with kimberlites from the Slave Craton (Canada) and SW Greenland
title_full_unstemmed How unique is the Udachnaya-East kimberlite? Comparison with kimberlites from the Slave Craton (Canada) and SW Greenland
title_sort how unique is the udachnaya-east kimberlite? comparison with kimberlites from the slave craton (canada) and sw greenland
publisher Elsevier Science Bv
publishDate 2009
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.03.032
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/61731
geographic Canada
Greenland
geographic_facet Canada
Greenland
genre Greenland
Siberia
genre_facet Greenland
Siberia
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.03.032
Kamenetsky, VS and Kamenetsky, MB and Weiss, Y and Navon, O and Nielsen, TFD and Mernagh, TP, How unique is the Udachnaya-East kimberlite? Comparison with kimberlites from the Slave Craton (Canada) and SW Greenland, Lithos: An International Journal of Mineralogy, Petrology, and Geochemistry, 112, (November) pp. 334-346. ISSN 0024-4937 (2009) [Refereed Article]
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/61731
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.03.032
container_title Lithos
container_volume 112
container_start_page 334
op_container_end_page 346
_version_ 1766019097069355008