The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison

This study used VHF telemetry, time-depth recorders (TDRs) collecting geolocation and sea-surface temperature data, and foraging-trip durations to describe and compare the foraging zones of royal and rockhopper penguins at Macquarie Island. VHF telemetry was unsuccessful, but TDRs were deployed 61 t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Research
Main Author: Hull, CL
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: CSIRO Publishing 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1071/WR98028
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/16873
id ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:16873
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:16873 2023-05-15T17:09:58+02:00 The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison Hull, CL 1999 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR98028 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/16873 en eng CSIRO Publishing http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR98028 Hull, CL, The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison, Wildlife Research, 26, (6) pp. 789-803. ISSN 1035-3712 (1999) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/16873 Biological Sciences Ecology Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology) Refereed Article PeerReviewed 1999 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1071/WR98028 2019-12-13T21:00:12Z This study used VHF telemetry, time-depth recorders (TDRs) collecting geolocation and sea-surface temperature data, and foraging-trip durations to describe and compare the foraging zones of royal and rockhopper penguins at Macquarie Island. VHF telemetry was unsuccessful, but TDRs were deployed 61 times across the four stages of the breeding season (males during incubation, females during incubation, guard stage and creche stage) during the 1994/95 and 1995/96 austral summers, with 37 providing data for analysis. The errors inherent in geolocation made it impossible to determine precise foraging zones and overlaps between the species. However, sea-surface temperature data and foraging-trip durations provided estimates of foraging zones. Both species foraged in waters of the same temperature (6.8-10.8C), representing the same regions of the polar frontal zone. It was estimated that rockhopper penguins did not travel as far as royal penguins, providing some degree of segregation in foraging zones. When the data were assessed contemporaneously, to take into account the 3-week asynchrony in the breeding season of the species, the overlap in foraging zones was small. Article in Journal/Newspaper Macquarie Island eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) Austral Wildlife Research 26 6 789
institution Open Polar
collection eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania)
op_collection_id ftunivtasecite
language English
topic Biological Sciences
Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Hull, CL
The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison
topic_facet Biological Sciences
Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
description This study used VHF telemetry, time-depth recorders (TDRs) collecting geolocation and sea-surface temperature data, and foraging-trip durations to describe and compare the foraging zones of royal and rockhopper penguins at Macquarie Island. VHF telemetry was unsuccessful, but TDRs were deployed 61 times across the four stages of the breeding season (males during incubation, females during incubation, guard stage and creche stage) during the 1994/95 and 1995/96 austral summers, with 37 providing data for analysis. The errors inherent in geolocation made it impossible to determine precise foraging zones and overlaps between the species. However, sea-surface temperature data and foraging-trip durations provided estimates of foraging zones. Both species foraged in waters of the same temperature (6.8-10.8C), representing the same regions of the polar frontal zone. It was estimated that rockhopper penguins did not travel as far as royal penguins, providing some degree of segregation in foraging zones. When the data were assessed contemporaneously, to take into account the 3-week asynchrony in the breeding season of the species, the overlap in foraging zones was small.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hull, CL
author_facet Hull, CL
author_sort Hull, CL
title The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison
title_short The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison
title_full The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison
title_fullStr The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison
title_full_unstemmed The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison
title_sort foraging zones of breeding royal (eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (e-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison
publisher CSIRO Publishing
publishDate 1999
url https://doi.org/10.1071/WR98028
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/16873
geographic Austral
geographic_facet Austral
genre Macquarie Island
genre_facet Macquarie Island
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR98028
Hull, CL, The foraging zones of breeding royal (Eudyptes schlegeli) and rockhopper (E-chrysocome) penguins: an assessment of techniques and species comparison, Wildlife Research, 26, (6) pp. 789-803. ISSN 1035-3712 (1999) [Refereed Article]
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/16873
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1071/WR98028
container_title Wildlife Research
container_volume 26
container_issue 6
container_start_page 789
_version_ 1766066342015795200