Access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation
Documents are critical in native title litigation. This article explores the different methods of, and common problems encountered when, accessing such documents. By examining recent decisions dealing with the Hearne v Street obligation, non-party access requests, and legal professional privilege, t...
Published in: | The University of Queensland Law Journal |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Queensland Press
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v41i2.6081 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151878 |
id |
ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:151878 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:151878 2023-05-15T16:16:07+02:00 Access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation Moss, A 2022 https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v41i2.6081 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151878 en eng University of Queensland Press http://dx.doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v41i2.6081 Moss, A, Access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation, The University of Queensland Law Journal, 42, (1) pp. 1-28. ISSN 0083-4041 (2022) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151878 Law and Legal Studies Legal systems Civil procedure Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2022 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v41i2.6081 2022-11-21T23:17:12Z Documents are critical in native title litigation. This article explores the different methods of, and common problems encountered when, accessing such documents. By examining recent decisions dealing with the Hearne v Street obligation, non-party access requests, and legal professional privilege, this paper explores how the Court has grappled with the translation of general principles of practice to the unique context of native title litigation. It observes the Court has refused to create special native title rules, but rather has pragmatically applied general principles to native title matters on a case-by-case basis. Accordingly, close attention to these judicial developments is necessary, lest the interests of ones clients, or of First Nations persons, be adversely affected by inappropriate document disclosure. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) The University of Queensland Law Journal |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) |
op_collection_id |
ftunivtasecite |
language |
English |
topic |
Law and Legal Studies Legal systems Civil procedure |
spellingShingle |
Law and Legal Studies Legal systems Civil procedure Moss, A Access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation |
topic_facet |
Law and Legal Studies Legal systems Civil procedure |
description |
Documents are critical in native title litigation. This article explores the different methods of, and common problems encountered when, accessing such documents. By examining recent decisions dealing with the Hearne v Street obligation, non-party access requests, and legal professional privilege, this paper explores how the Court has grappled with the translation of general principles of practice to the unique context of native title litigation. It observes the Court has refused to create special native title rules, but rather has pragmatically applied general principles to native title matters on a case-by-case basis. Accordingly, close attention to these judicial developments is necessary, lest the interests of ones clients, or of First Nations persons, be adversely affected by inappropriate document disclosure. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Moss, A |
author_facet |
Moss, A |
author_sort |
Moss, A |
title |
Access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation |
title_short |
Access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation |
title_full |
Access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation |
title_fullStr |
Access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation |
title_sort |
access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation |
publisher |
University of Queensland Press |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v41i2.6081 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151878 |
genre |
First Nations |
genre_facet |
First Nations |
op_relation |
http://dx.doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v41i2.6081 Moss, A, Access to anthropological evidence and documents created in native title litigation, The University of Queensland Law Journal, 42, (1) pp. 1-28. ISSN 0083-4041 (2022) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151878 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v41i2.6081 |
container_title |
The University of Queensland Law Journal |
_version_ |
1766001968187179008 |