Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage

The governance of heritage in Antarctica has always been centred on thenation-state and the dissemination of its Antarctic narrative both withinthe state and between states. However, non-state actors outside of thestate offer alternative conceptions of Antarctic heritage. What are thegeopolitical co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Geographical Journal
Main Author: Hingley, R
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Royal Geographical Soc 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214
id ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:151214
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:151214 2023-05-15T13:42:41+02:00 Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage Hingley, R 2023 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214 en eng Royal Geographical Soc http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214/2/151214 - Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses.pdf http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214/1/GJ-TS-Jun-2020-0053.R1_Proof_hi.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383 Hingley, R, Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage, The Geographical Journal, 189, (1) pp. 40-48. ISSN 0016-7398 (2023) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214 Human Society Human geography Political geography Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2023 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383 2023-02-27T23:17:24Z The governance of heritage in Antarctica has always been centred on thenation-state and the dissemination of its Antarctic narrative both withinthe state and between states. However, non-state actors outside of thestate offer alternative conceptions of Antarctic heritage. What are thegeopolitical consequences of their engagement with objects and places ofheritage on and around the frozen continent? Are non-state actorsaccounted for within the current, official and dominant discourse onheritage under the Antarctic Treaty System? These questions align with abroader enquiry into the systems capacity to adequately account fornon-state actors and their increasing presence in the polar region 60years on from the signing of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty. In an attempt tobetter understand the nature of non-state actors interaction withAntarctic heritage and the conditions under which it occurs, this paperwill investigate how three non-state actors conceive of and engage withAntarctic heritage: the tourism industry, environmental activists, andindividuals. It will then consider the implications of their engagementwith Antarctic heritage under the current framework for heritagemanagement, before considering the potential obstacles the system mayencounter in the future. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) Antarctic The Antarctic The Geographical Journal
institution Open Polar
collection eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania)
op_collection_id ftunivtasecite
language English
topic Human Society
Human geography
Political geography
spellingShingle Human Society
Human geography
Political geography
Hingley, R
Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage
topic_facet Human Society
Human geography
Political geography
description The governance of heritage in Antarctica has always been centred on thenation-state and the dissemination of its Antarctic narrative both withinthe state and between states. However, non-state actors outside of thestate offer alternative conceptions of Antarctic heritage. What are thegeopolitical consequences of their engagement with objects and places ofheritage on and around the frozen continent? Are non-state actorsaccounted for within the current, official and dominant discourse onheritage under the Antarctic Treaty System? These questions align with abroader enquiry into the systems capacity to adequately account fornon-state actors and their increasing presence in the polar region 60years on from the signing of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty. In an attempt tobetter understand the nature of non-state actors interaction withAntarctic heritage and the conditions under which it occurs, this paperwill investigate how three non-state actors conceive of and engage withAntarctic heritage: the tourism industry, environmental activists, andindividuals. It will then consider the implications of their engagementwith Antarctic heritage under the current framework for heritagemanagement, before considering the potential obstacles the system mayencounter in the future.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hingley, R
author_facet Hingley, R
author_sort Hingley, R
title Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage
title_short Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage
title_full Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage
title_fullStr Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage
title_full_unstemmed Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage
title_sort diverging antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of antarctic heritage
publisher Royal Geographical Soc
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
op_relation http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214/2/151214 - Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses.pdf
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214/1/GJ-TS-Jun-2020-0053.R1_Proof_hi.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383
Hingley, R, Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage, The Geographical Journal, 189, (1) pp. 40-48. ISSN 0016-7398 (2023) [Refereed Article]
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383
container_title The Geographical Journal
_version_ 1766171719921303552