Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage
The governance of heritage in Antarctica has always been centred on thenation-state and the dissemination of its Antarctic narrative both withinthe state and between states. However, non-state actors outside of thestate offer alternative conceptions of Antarctic heritage. What are thegeopolitical co...
Published in: | The Geographical Journal |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Royal Geographical Soc
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214 |
id |
ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:151214 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:151214 2023-05-15T13:42:41+02:00 Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage Hingley, R 2023 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214 en eng Royal Geographical Soc http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214/2/151214 - Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses.pdf http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214/1/GJ-TS-Jun-2020-0053.R1_Proof_hi.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383 Hingley, R, Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage, The Geographical Journal, 189, (1) pp. 40-48. ISSN 0016-7398 (2023) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214 Human Society Human geography Political geography Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2023 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383 2023-02-27T23:17:24Z The governance of heritage in Antarctica has always been centred on thenation-state and the dissemination of its Antarctic narrative both withinthe state and between states. However, non-state actors outside of thestate offer alternative conceptions of Antarctic heritage. What are thegeopolitical consequences of their engagement with objects and places ofheritage on and around the frozen continent? Are non-state actorsaccounted for within the current, official and dominant discourse onheritage under the Antarctic Treaty System? These questions align with abroader enquiry into the systems capacity to adequately account fornon-state actors and their increasing presence in the polar region 60years on from the signing of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty. In an attempt tobetter understand the nature of non-state actors interaction withAntarctic heritage and the conditions under which it occurs, this paperwill investigate how three non-state actors conceive of and engage withAntarctic heritage: the tourism industry, environmental activists, andindividuals. It will then consider the implications of their engagementwith Antarctic heritage under the current framework for heritagemanagement, before considering the potential obstacles the system mayencounter in the future. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) Antarctic The Antarctic The Geographical Journal |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) |
op_collection_id |
ftunivtasecite |
language |
English |
topic |
Human Society Human geography Political geography |
spellingShingle |
Human Society Human geography Political geography Hingley, R Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage |
topic_facet |
Human Society Human geography Political geography |
description |
The governance of heritage in Antarctica has always been centred on thenation-state and the dissemination of its Antarctic narrative both withinthe state and between states. However, non-state actors outside of thestate offer alternative conceptions of Antarctic heritage. What are thegeopolitical consequences of their engagement with objects and places ofheritage on and around the frozen continent? Are non-state actorsaccounted for within the current, official and dominant discourse onheritage under the Antarctic Treaty System? These questions align with abroader enquiry into the systems capacity to adequately account fornon-state actors and their increasing presence in the polar region 60years on from the signing of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty. In an attempt tobetter understand the nature of non-state actors interaction withAntarctic heritage and the conditions under which it occurs, this paperwill investigate how three non-state actors conceive of and engage withAntarctic heritage: the tourism industry, environmental activists, andindividuals. It will then consider the implications of their engagementwith Antarctic heritage under the current framework for heritagemanagement, before considering the potential obstacles the system mayencounter in the future. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Hingley, R |
author_facet |
Hingley, R |
author_sort |
Hingley, R |
title |
Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage |
title_short |
Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage |
title_full |
Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage |
title_fullStr |
Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage |
title_sort |
diverging antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of antarctic heritage |
publisher |
Royal Geographical Soc |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214 |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica |
op_relation |
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214/2/151214 - Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses.pdf http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214/1/GJ-TS-Jun-2020-0053.R1_Proof_hi.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383 Hingley, R, Diverging Antarctic heritage discourses: the geopolitical ramifications of non-state actor engagement with the state-sanctioned' version of Antarctic heritage, The Geographical Journal, 189, (1) pp. 40-48. ISSN 0016-7398 (2023) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/151214 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12383 |
container_title |
The Geographical Journal |
_version_ |
1766171719921303552 |