Comparability of slack water and Lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements

Coral reef calcification is predicted to decline as a result of ocean acidification and other anthropogenic stressors. The majority of studies predicting declines based on in situ relationships between environmental parameters and net community calcification rate have been location-specific, prevent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE
Main Authors: Shaw, EC, Phinn, SR, Tilbrook, B, Steven, A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112161
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426626
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/119176
id ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:119176
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:119176 2023-05-15T17:51:09+02:00 Comparability of slack water and Lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements Shaw, EC Phinn, SR Tilbrook, B Steven, A 2014 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112161 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426626 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/119176 en eng Public Library of Science http://ecite.utas.edu.au/119176/1/Shaw et al 2014.PDF http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112161 Shaw, EC and Phinn, SR and Tilbrook, B and Steven, A, Comparability of slack water and Lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements, PLoS One, 9, (11) Article e112161. ISSN 1932-6203 (2014) [Refereed Article] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426626 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/119176 Biological Sciences Ecology Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology) Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2014 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112161 2019-12-13T22:18:22Z Coral reef calcification is predicted to decline as a result of ocean acidification and other anthropogenic stressors. The majority of studies predicting declines based on in situ relationships between environmental parameters and net community calcification rate have been location-specific, preventing accurate predictions for coral reefs globally. In this study, net community calcification and production were measured on a coral reef flat at One Tree Island, Great Barrier Reef, using Lagrangian flow respirometry and slack water methods. Net community calcification, daytime net photosynthesis and nighttime respiration were higher under the flow respirometry method, likely due to increased water flow relative to the slack water method. The two methods also varied in the degrees to which they were influenced by potential measurement uncertainties. The difference in the results from these two commonly used methods implies that some of the location-specific differences in coral reef community metabolism may be due to differences in measurement methods. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ocean acidification eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) PLoS ONE 9 11 e112161
institution Open Polar
collection eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania)
op_collection_id ftunivtasecite
language English
topic Biological Sciences
Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
Shaw, EC
Phinn, SR
Tilbrook, B
Steven, A
Comparability of slack water and Lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements
topic_facet Biological Sciences
Ecology
Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)
description Coral reef calcification is predicted to decline as a result of ocean acidification and other anthropogenic stressors. The majority of studies predicting declines based on in situ relationships between environmental parameters and net community calcification rate have been location-specific, preventing accurate predictions for coral reefs globally. In this study, net community calcification and production were measured on a coral reef flat at One Tree Island, Great Barrier Reef, using Lagrangian flow respirometry and slack water methods. Net community calcification, daytime net photosynthesis and nighttime respiration were higher under the flow respirometry method, likely due to increased water flow relative to the slack water method. The two methods also varied in the degrees to which they were influenced by potential measurement uncertainties. The difference in the results from these two commonly used methods implies that some of the location-specific differences in coral reef community metabolism may be due to differences in measurement methods.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Shaw, EC
Phinn, SR
Tilbrook, B
Steven, A
author_facet Shaw, EC
Phinn, SR
Tilbrook, B
Steven, A
author_sort Shaw, EC
title Comparability of slack water and Lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements
title_short Comparability of slack water and Lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements
title_full Comparability of slack water and Lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements
title_fullStr Comparability of slack water and Lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements
title_full_unstemmed Comparability of slack water and Lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements
title_sort comparability of slack water and lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2014
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112161
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426626
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/119176
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_relation http://ecite.utas.edu.au/119176/1/Shaw et al 2014.PDF
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112161
Shaw, EC and Phinn, SR and Tilbrook, B and Steven, A, Comparability of slack water and Lagrangian flow respirometry methods for community metabolic measurements, PLoS One, 9, (11) Article e112161. ISSN 1932-6203 (2014) [Refereed Article]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25426626
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/119176
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112161
container_title PLoS ONE
container_volume 9
container_issue 11
container_start_page e112161
_version_ 1766158201210798080