Science in the Court! The Role of Science in 'Whaling in the Antarctic'
This paper deals with the way science featured in the case Whaling in the Antarctic ( Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening ). Science was invoked by both Australia and Japan (and by New Zealand). The activities carried out under JARPA II and JARPA were portrayed as unscientific by Australia a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book Part |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Brill Nijhoff
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004313828_013 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/110245 |
id |
ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:110245 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:110245 2023-05-15T14:03:26+02:00 Science in the Court! The Role of Science in 'Whaling in the Antarctic' Press, A 2016 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004313828_013 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/110245 en eng Brill Nijhoff http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004313828_013 Press, A, Science in the Court! The Role of Science in 'Whaling in the Antarctic', Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment, Brill Nijhoff, M Fitzmaurice, D Tamada (ed), The Netherlands, pp. 346-386. ISBN 9789004313644 (2016) [Research Book Chapter] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/110245 Law and Legal Studies Law International Law (excl. International Trade Law) Research Book Chapter NonPeerReviewed 2016 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004313828_013 2019-12-13T22:10:45Z This paper deals with the way science featured in the case Whaling in the Antarctic ( Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening ). Science was invoked by both Australia and Japan (and by New Zealand). The activities carried out under JARPA II and JARPA were portrayed as unscientific by Australia and as science by Japan. Scientists, as expert witnesses, were called upon to give written and oral evidence (two by Australia and one by Japan) and they were cross-examined in Court, and were questioned by the bench. Australia presented two Expert Witnesses to discuss science, Dr Nick Gales, Chief Scientist of the Australian Antarctic Program, and Professor Marc Mangel of the University of California, Santa Cruz. Japan presented one Expert Witness, Professor Lars Walle from the University of Oslo. Book Part Antarc* Antarctic Australian Antarctic Program eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) Antarctic New Zealand The Antarctic The Bench ENVELOPE(-53.181,-53.181,49.767,49.767) 346 386 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) |
op_collection_id |
ftunivtasecite |
language |
English |
topic |
Law and Legal Studies Law International Law (excl. International Trade Law) |
spellingShingle |
Law and Legal Studies Law International Law (excl. International Trade Law) Press, A Science in the Court! The Role of Science in 'Whaling in the Antarctic' |
topic_facet |
Law and Legal Studies Law International Law (excl. International Trade Law) |
description |
This paper deals with the way science featured in the case Whaling in the Antarctic ( Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening ). Science was invoked by both Australia and Japan (and by New Zealand). The activities carried out under JARPA II and JARPA were portrayed as unscientific by Australia and as science by Japan. Scientists, as expert witnesses, were called upon to give written and oral evidence (two by Australia and one by Japan) and they were cross-examined in Court, and were questioned by the bench. Australia presented two Expert Witnesses to discuss science, Dr Nick Gales, Chief Scientist of the Australian Antarctic Program, and Professor Marc Mangel of the University of California, Santa Cruz. Japan presented one Expert Witness, Professor Lars Walle from the University of Oslo. |
format |
Book Part |
author |
Press, A |
author_facet |
Press, A |
author_sort |
Press, A |
title |
Science in the Court! The Role of Science in 'Whaling in the Antarctic' |
title_short |
Science in the Court! The Role of Science in 'Whaling in the Antarctic' |
title_full |
Science in the Court! The Role of Science in 'Whaling in the Antarctic' |
title_fullStr |
Science in the Court! The Role of Science in 'Whaling in the Antarctic' |
title_full_unstemmed |
Science in the Court! The Role of Science in 'Whaling in the Antarctic' |
title_sort |
science in the court! the role of science in 'whaling in the antarctic' |
publisher |
Brill Nijhoff |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004313828_013 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/110245 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-53.181,-53.181,49.767,49.767) |
geographic |
Antarctic New Zealand The Antarctic The Bench |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic New Zealand The Antarctic The Bench |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Australian Antarctic Program |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Australian Antarctic Program |
op_relation |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004313828_013 Press, A, Science in the Court! The Role of Science in 'Whaling in the Antarctic', Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment, Brill Nijhoff, M Fitzmaurice, D Tamada (ed), The Netherlands, pp. 346-386. ISBN 9789004313644 (2016) [Research Book Chapter] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/110245 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004313828_013 |
container_start_page |
346 |
op_container_end_page |
386 |
_version_ |
1766274094290960384 |