Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists
Australia's claim to the Australian Antarctic Territory (AAT) is not widely recognised internationally. Discussing enforcement of Australian domestic law in the Southern Ocean, defending the territorial claim and other emotive issues related to Antarctica therefore requires some domestic sensit...
Published in: | Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Routledge
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998 |
id |
ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:103998 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:103998 2023-05-15T14:03:25+02:00 Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists Hodgson-Johnston, I 2015 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998 en eng Routledge http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998/3/103998.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811 Hodgson-Johnston, I, Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists, Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, 7, (3) pp. 183-202. ISSN 1836-6503 (2015) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998 Law and Legal Studies Law International Law (excl. International Trade Law) Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2015 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811 2019-12-13T22:05:26Z Australia's claim to the Australian Antarctic Territory (AAT) is not widely recognised internationally. Discussing enforcement of Australian domestic law in the Southern Ocean, defending the territorial claim and other emotive issues related to Antarctica therefore requires some domestic sensitivity to broader international diplomacy. Using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods to identify the political parties who most often raise issues of Antarctica, the major themes of Antarctic policy and politics since 1998, and the discussions of Antarctic sovereignty by political parties. Through this analysis, the different approaches of the Australian Labor Party, the Federal Liberal-National Party Coalition and the Australian Greens to Antarctic sovereignty-related issues are identified and discussed. While broadly there is tripartisan support for Antarctic policies, some differences between political parties do exist. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Southern Ocean eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) Antarctic Southern Ocean Australian Antarctic Territory Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs 7 3 183 202 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) |
op_collection_id |
ftunivtasecite |
language |
English |
topic |
Law and Legal Studies Law International Law (excl. International Trade Law) |
spellingShingle |
Law and Legal Studies Law International Law (excl. International Trade Law) Hodgson-Johnston, I Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists |
topic_facet |
Law and Legal Studies Law International Law (excl. International Trade Law) |
description |
Australia's claim to the Australian Antarctic Territory (AAT) is not widely recognised internationally. Discussing enforcement of Australian domestic law in the Southern Ocean, defending the territorial claim and other emotive issues related to Antarctica therefore requires some domestic sensitivity to broader international diplomacy. Using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods to identify the political parties who most often raise issues of Antarctica, the major themes of Antarctic policy and politics since 1998, and the discussions of Antarctic sovereignty by political parties. Through this analysis, the different approaches of the Australian Labor Party, the Federal Liberal-National Party Coalition and the Australian Greens to Antarctic sovereignty-related issues are identified and discussed. While broadly there is tripartisan support for Antarctic policies, some differences between political parties do exist. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Hodgson-Johnston, I |
author_facet |
Hodgson-Johnston, I |
author_sort |
Hodgson-Johnston, I |
title |
Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists |
title_short |
Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists |
title_full |
Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists |
title_fullStr |
Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists |
title_full_unstemmed |
Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists |
title_sort |
australian politics and antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists |
publisher |
Routledge |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998 |
geographic |
Antarctic Southern Ocean Australian Antarctic Territory |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Southern Ocean Australian Antarctic Territory |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Southern Ocean |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Southern Ocean |
op_relation |
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998/3/103998.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811 Hodgson-Johnston, I, Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists, Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, 7, (3) pp. 183-202. ISSN 1836-6503 (2015) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811 |
container_title |
Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs |
container_volume |
7 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
183 |
op_container_end_page |
202 |
_version_ |
1766274071953145856 |