Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists

Australia's claim to the Australian Antarctic Territory (AAT) is not widely recognised internationally. Discussing enforcement of Australian domestic law in the Southern Ocean, defending the territorial claim and other emotive issues related to Antarctica therefore requires some domestic sensit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs
Main Author: Hodgson-Johnston, I
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2015
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998
id ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:103998
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:103998 2023-05-15T14:03:25+02:00 Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists Hodgson-Johnston, I 2015 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998 en eng Routledge http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998/3/103998.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811 Hodgson-Johnston, I, Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists, Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, 7, (3) pp. 183-202. ISSN 1836-6503 (2015) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998 Law and Legal Studies Law International Law (excl. International Trade Law) Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2015 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811 2019-12-13T22:05:26Z Australia's claim to the Australian Antarctic Territory (AAT) is not widely recognised internationally. Discussing enforcement of Australian domestic law in the Southern Ocean, defending the territorial claim and other emotive issues related to Antarctica therefore requires some domestic sensitivity to broader international diplomacy. Using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods to identify the political parties who most often raise issues of Antarctica, the major themes of Antarctic policy and politics since 1998, and the discussions of Antarctic sovereignty by political parties. Through this analysis, the different approaches of the Australian Labor Party, the Federal Liberal-National Party Coalition and the Australian Greens to Antarctic sovereignty-related issues are identified and discussed. While broadly there is tripartisan support for Antarctic policies, some differences between political parties do exist. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Southern Ocean eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) Antarctic Southern Ocean Australian Antarctic Territory Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs 7 3 183 202
institution Open Polar
collection eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania)
op_collection_id ftunivtasecite
language English
topic Law and Legal Studies
Law
International Law (excl. International Trade Law)
spellingShingle Law and Legal Studies
Law
International Law (excl. International Trade Law)
Hodgson-Johnston, I
Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists
topic_facet Law and Legal Studies
Law
International Law (excl. International Trade Law)
description Australia's claim to the Australian Antarctic Territory (AAT) is not widely recognised internationally. Discussing enforcement of Australian domestic law in the Southern Ocean, defending the territorial claim and other emotive issues related to Antarctica therefore requires some domestic sensitivity to broader international diplomacy. Using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods to identify the political parties who most often raise issues of Antarctica, the major themes of Antarctic policy and politics since 1998, and the discussions of Antarctic sovereignty by political parties. Through this analysis, the different approaches of the Australian Labor Party, the Federal Liberal-National Party Coalition and the Australian Greens to Antarctic sovereignty-related issues are identified and discussed. While broadly there is tripartisan support for Antarctic policies, some differences between political parties do exist.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hodgson-Johnston, I
author_facet Hodgson-Johnston, I
author_sort Hodgson-Johnston, I
title Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists
title_short Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists
title_full Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists
title_fullStr Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists
title_full_unstemmed Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists
title_sort australian politics and antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists
publisher Routledge
publishDate 2015
url https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998
geographic Antarctic
Southern Ocean
Australian Antarctic Territory
geographic_facet Antarctic
Southern Ocean
Australian Antarctic Territory
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
op_relation http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998/3/103998.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811
Hodgson-Johnston, I, Australian politics and Antarctic sovereignty: themes, protagonists and antagonists, Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, 7, (3) pp. 183-202. ISSN 1836-6503 (2015) [Refereed Article]
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103998
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2015.1101811
container_title Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs
container_volume 7
container_issue 3
container_start_page 183
op_container_end_page 202
_version_ 1766274071953145856