Estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the Netherlands using an online panel survey

In this study we describe a two-phase survey design and implications of approaches to non-response adjustments on estimates of the total catch taken by Dutch recreational fishers, including marine catches for Atlantic cod and European seabass and European eel in freshwater. The survey comprised thre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil
Main Authors: van der Hammen, T, de Graaf, M, Lyle, JM
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Academic Press Ltd Elsevier Science Ltd 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv190
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103715
id ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:103715
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:103715 2023-05-15T15:27:26+02:00 Estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the Netherlands using an online panel survey van der Hammen, T de Graaf, M Lyle, JM 2016 https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv190 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103715 en eng Academic Press Ltd Elsevier Science Ltd http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv190 van der Hammen, T and de Graaf, M and Lyle, JM, Estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the Netherlands using an online panel survey, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73, (2) pp. 441-450. ISSN 1054-3139 (2016) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103715 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences Fisheries Sciences Fisheries Sciences not elsewhere classified Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2016 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv190 2019-12-13T22:05:07Z In this study we describe a two-phase survey design and implications of approaches to non-response adjustments on estimates of the total catch taken by Dutch recreational fishers, including marine catches for Atlantic cod and European seabass and European eel in freshwater. The survey comprised three main elements which were executed online: a screening survey to estimate the characteristics of the population of recreational fishers (number of fishers, their demographic profile and stated fishing avidity); a 12 month logbook survey to estimate effort and catch rates; and non-response follow up surveys to adjust for non-response. A response rate of 80% was achieved for the screening survey and, following non-response adjustment and limited data imputation, 89% for the logbook survey. Some logbook participants reported no fishing activity (drop-outs) and were removed from the analysis. In addition, logbook data were weighted in accordance with the stated avidity distribution in the population to address potential response bias based on avidity. Imputation and weighting for avidity influenced the catch estimates a little, whereas the removal of the fisher drop-outs was influential, linked to the rates of fisher drop-outs (18% for freshwater and 55% for marine fishers). Freshwater recreational fishing was more popular than marine fishing; 9.7% of the Dutch population participating in the former and 4.1% fishing in marine waters. In total an estimated 53.6 million freshwater fish were caught (2.6 million retained) and 13.6 million marine fish were caught (9.6 million retained). Respective catch estimates for Atlantic cod, European seabass and European eel were 0.70, 0.35 and 1.23 million fish (0.53, 0.23 and 0.34 million retained). We conclude that the survey design using an online panel may serve as an example for future surveys because of its efficacy to collect a rich set of data at relatively low cost compared to traditional survey methods. Article in Journal/Newspaper atlantic cod eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 73 2 441 450
institution Open Polar
collection eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania)
op_collection_id ftunivtasecite
language English
topic Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
Fisheries Sciences
Fisheries Sciences not elsewhere classified
spellingShingle Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
Fisheries Sciences
Fisheries Sciences not elsewhere classified
van der Hammen, T
de Graaf, M
Lyle, JM
Estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the Netherlands using an online panel survey
topic_facet Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
Fisheries Sciences
Fisheries Sciences not elsewhere classified
description In this study we describe a two-phase survey design and implications of approaches to non-response adjustments on estimates of the total catch taken by Dutch recreational fishers, including marine catches for Atlantic cod and European seabass and European eel in freshwater. The survey comprised three main elements which were executed online: a screening survey to estimate the characteristics of the population of recreational fishers (number of fishers, their demographic profile and stated fishing avidity); a 12 month logbook survey to estimate effort and catch rates; and non-response follow up surveys to adjust for non-response. A response rate of 80% was achieved for the screening survey and, following non-response adjustment and limited data imputation, 89% for the logbook survey. Some logbook participants reported no fishing activity (drop-outs) and were removed from the analysis. In addition, logbook data were weighted in accordance with the stated avidity distribution in the population to address potential response bias based on avidity. Imputation and weighting for avidity influenced the catch estimates a little, whereas the removal of the fisher drop-outs was influential, linked to the rates of fisher drop-outs (18% for freshwater and 55% for marine fishers). Freshwater recreational fishing was more popular than marine fishing; 9.7% of the Dutch population participating in the former and 4.1% fishing in marine waters. In total an estimated 53.6 million freshwater fish were caught (2.6 million retained) and 13.6 million marine fish were caught (9.6 million retained). Respective catch estimates for Atlantic cod, European seabass and European eel were 0.70, 0.35 and 1.23 million fish (0.53, 0.23 and 0.34 million retained). We conclude that the survey design using an online panel may serve as an example for future surveys because of its efficacy to collect a rich set of data at relatively low cost compared to traditional survey methods.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author van der Hammen, T
de Graaf, M
Lyle, JM
author_facet van der Hammen, T
de Graaf, M
Lyle, JM
author_sort van der Hammen, T
title Estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the Netherlands using an online panel survey
title_short Estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the Netherlands using an online panel survey
title_full Estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the Netherlands using an online panel survey
title_fullStr Estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the Netherlands using an online panel survey
title_full_unstemmed Estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the Netherlands using an online panel survey
title_sort estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the netherlands using an online panel survey
publisher Academic Press Ltd Elsevier Science Ltd
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv190
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103715
genre atlantic cod
genre_facet atlantic cod
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv190
van der Hammen, T and de Graaf, M and Lyle, JM, Estimating catches of marine and freshwater recreational fisheries in the Netherlands using an online panel survey, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73, (2) pp. 441-450. ISSN 1054-3139 (2016) [Refereed Article]
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/103715
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv190
container_title ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil
container_volume 73
container_issue 2
container_start_page 441
op_container_end_page 450
_version_ 1766357872599367680