Assessment of surface pressure between Zhongshan and Dome A in East Antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses

The accuracy of daily mean surface pressure from five meteorological reanalysesis assessed against in situ observations from automatic weather stations inEast Antarctica for 2005 to 2008. The in situ observations are from Zhongshan,LGB69, EAGLE, and Dome A. The five reanalyses all explain more than...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research
Main Authors: Xie, A, Allison, I, Xiao, C, Wang, S, Ren, J, Qin, D
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Inst Arctic Alpine Res 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-46.3.669
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/100642
id ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:100642
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivtasecite:oai:ecite.utas.edu.au:100642 2023-05-15T14:03:25+02:00 Assessment of surface pressure between Zhongshan and Dome A in East Antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses Xie, A Allison, I Xiao, C Wang, S Ren, J Qin, D 2014 https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-46.3.669 http://ecite.utas.edu.au/100642 en eng Inst Arctic Alpine Res http://dx.doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-46.3.669 Xie, A and Allison, I and Xiao, C and Wang, S and Ren, J and Qin, D, Assessment of surface pressure between Zhongshan and Dome A in East Antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses, Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research, 46, (3) pp. 669-681. ISSN 1523-0430 (2014) [Refereed Article] http://ecite.utas.edu.au/100642 Earth Sciences Atmospheric Sciences Meteorology Refereed Article PeerReviewed 2014 ftunivtasecite https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-46.3.669 2019-12-13T22:02:28Z The accuracy of daily mean surface pressure from five meteorological reanalysesis assessed against in situ observations from automatic weather stations inEast Antarctica for 2005 to 2008. The in situ observations are from Zhongshan,LGB69, EAGLE, and Dome A. The five reanalyses all explain more than 87%of the average variance and have annual root mean square errors between 15 hPaand 45 hPa. The ERA Interim reanalysis performs best against both criteria. TheNCEP-1, NCEP-2, and 20CRv2 reanalyses have negative biases of 29.7 hPa,25.9 hPa, and 11.1 hPa, respectively, while ERA Interim and JCDAS have positivebiases of 4.9 hPa and 14.9 hPa. The reanalyses do not show obvious seasonaldifferences. The errors generally tend to decrease from the coast to the interiorof the East Antarctic ice sheet, although there are regional differences betweenthe performance of the different reanalyses. ERA Interim is superior to otherreanalyses, probably because of its 4D assimilation scheme, which is stronglyguided by satellite observations. The three NCEP reanalyses perform worst; theirassimilation scheme is more constrained by limited observations and 20CRv2has less input data, assimilating only surface pressure observations. Despite deficienciesand limitations, the reanalyses are still powerful tools for climate studiesin the Antarctic region. However, more in situ observations are required, especiallyfrom the vast interior of Antarctica. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic and Alpine Research Antarctica Arctic East Antarctica Ice Sheet eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania) Antarctic East Antarctic Ice Sheet East Antarctica The Antarctic Zhongshan ENVELOPE(76.371,76.371,-69.373,-69.373) Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 46 3 669 681
institution Open Polar
collection eCite UTAS (University of Tasmania)
op_collection_id ftunivtasecite
language English
topic Earth Sciences
Atmospheric Sciences
Meteorology
spellingShingle Earth Sciences
Atmospheric Sciences
Meteorology
Xie, A
Allison, I
Xiao, C
Wang, S
Ren, J
Qin, D
Assessment of surface pressure between Zhongshan and Dome A in East Antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses
topic_facet Earth Sciences
Atmospheric Sciences
Meteorology
description The accuracy of daily mean surface pressure from five meteorological reanalysesis assessed against in situ observations from automatic weather stations inEast Antarctica for 2005 to 2008. The in situ observations are from Zhongshan,LGB69, EAGLE, and Dome A. The five reanalyses all explain more than 87%of the average variance and have annual root mean square errors between 15 hPaand 45 hPa. The ERA Interim reanalysis performs best against both criteria. TheNCEP-1, NCEP-2, and 20CRv2 reanalyses have negative biases of 29.7 hPa,25.9 hPa, and 11.1 hPa, respectively, while ERA Interim and JCDAS have positivebiases of 4.9 hPa and 14.9 hPa. The reanalyses do not show obvious seasonaldifferences. The errors generally tend to decrease from the coast to the interiorof the East Antarctic ice sheet, although there are regional differences betweenthe performance of the different reanalyses. ERA Interim is superior to otherreanalyses, probably because of its 4D assimilation scheme, which is stronglyguided by satellite observations. The three NCEP reanalyses perform worst; theirassimilation scheme is more constrained by limited observations and 20CRv2has less input data, assimilating only surface pressure observations. Despite deficienciesand limitations, the reanalyses are still powerful tools for climate studiesin the Antarctic region. However, more in situ observations are required, especiallyfrom the vast interior of Antarctica.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Xie, A
Allison, I
Xiao, C
Wang, S
Ren, J
Qin, D
author_facet Xie, A
Allison, I
Xiao, C
Wang, S
Ren, J
Qin, D
author_sort Xie, A
title Assessment of surface pressure between Zhongshan and Dome A in East Antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses
title_short Assessment of surface pressure between Zhongshan and Dome A in East Antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses
title_full Assessment of surface pressure between Zhongshan and Dome A in East Antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses
title_fullStr Assessment of surface pressure between Zhongshan and Dome A in East Antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of surface pressure between Zhongshan and Dome A in East Antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses
title_sort assessment of surface pressure between zhongshan and dome a in east antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses
publisher Inst Arctic Alpine Res
publishDate 2014
url https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-46.3.669
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/100642
long_lat ENVELOPE(76.371,76.371,-69.373,-69.373)
geographic Antarctic
East Antarctic Ice Sheet
East Antarctica
The Antarctic
Zhongshan
geographic_facet Antarctic
East Antarctic Ice Sheet
East Antarctica
The Antarctic
Zhongshan
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic and Alpine Research
Antarctica
Arctic
East Antarctica
Ice Sheet
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic and Alpine Research
Antarctica
Arctic
East Antarctica
Ice Sheet
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-46.3.669
Xie, A and Allison, I and Xiao, C and Wang, S and Ren, J and Qin, D, Assessment of surface pressure between Zhongshan and Dome A in East Antarctica from different meteorological reanalyses, Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research, 46, (3) pp. 669-681. ISSN 1523-0430 (2014) [Refereed Article]
http://ecite.utas.edu.au/100642
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-46.3.669
container_title Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research
container_volume 46
container_issue 3
container_start_page 669
op_container_end_page 681
_version_ 1766274061013352448