Indigenous Peoples’ Self-determination and Long-term Care: Sápmi and Nunavut

This paper examines long-term care for the elderly as a point of departure for critically engaging with the debate on the self-determination of Indigenous peoples. By employing the case of the Arctic Indigenous peoples, the Sámi Parliament (Sámediggi) in Norway and Government of Nunavut in Canada, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gao, I-An
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: University of Sydney 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/SWPS/article/view/12415
id ftunivsydneyojs:oai:ojs-prod.library.usyd.edu.au:article/12415
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivsydneyojs:oai:ojs-prod.library.usyd.edu.au:article/12415 2023-12-24T10:14:22+01:00 Indigenous Peoples’ Self-determination and Long-term Care: Sápmi and Nunavut Gao, I-An 2018-02-07 application/pdf https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/SWPS/article/view/12415 eng eng University of Sydney https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/SWPS/article/view/12415/11521 https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/SWPS/article/view/12415 Copyright (c) 2018 Social Work and Policy Studies: Social Justice, Practice and Theory Social Work & Policy Studies: Social Justice, Practice and Theory; Vol. 1 No. 001 (2018): Critical Engagements in Aging and Care 2209-0878 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2018 ftunivsydneyojs 2023-11-29T12:47:56Z This paper examines long-term care for the elderly as a point of departure for critically engaging with the debate on the self-determination of Indigenous peoples. By employing the case of the Arctic Indigenous peoples, the Sámi Parliament (Sámediggi) in Norway and Government of Nunavut in Canada, are utilised as central cases from which to explore the institutionalization and self-determination. The thrust of the paper calls for a critical re-investigation of the contingency of long-term care for the elderly in the context of claims of Indigenous sovereignty.Specifically, I examine the landscape of population ageing and the organisation of care among the Sápmi and Nunavut populations, focusing on colonisation from a circumpolar perspective. The functions and practices of Sámediggi and Government of Nunavut are analysed to illustrate how self-determination is exercised and to what extent they safeguard the rights of elderly people. Sámediggi and Nunavut government as institutional arrangements that mark significant advancements in Indigenous peoples’ reclamation of power and restoration of sovereign rights are discussed. Unfortunately, the political functions that would allow self-determination and self-government to be effective continue to be limited for the Inuit in Nunavut and the Sámi in Sápmi on the Norwegian side. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic inuit Nunavut Sámi The University of Sydney: Sydney eScholarship Journals online Arctic Canada Norway Nunavut
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Sydney: Sydney eScholarship Journals online
op_collection_id ftunivsydneyojs
language English
description This paper examines long-term care for the elderly as a point of departure for critically engaging with the debate on the self-determination of Indigenous peoples. By employing the case of the Arctic Indigenous peoples, the Sámi Parliament (Sámediggi) in Norway and Government of Nunavut in Canada, are utilised as central cases from which to explore the institutionalization and self-determination. The thrust of the paper calls for a critical re-investigation of the contingency of long-term care for the elderly in the context of claims of Indigenous sovereignty.Specifically, I examine the landscape of population ageing and the organisation of care among the Sápmi and Nunavut populations, focusing on colonisation from a circumpolar perspective. The functions and practices of Sámediggi and Government of Nunavut are analysed to illustrate how self-determination is exercised and to what extent they safeguard the rights of elderly people. Sámediggi and Nunavut government as institutional arrangements that mark significant advancements in Indigenous peoples’ reclamation of power and restoration of sovereign rights are discussed. Unfortunately, the political functions that would allow self-determination and self-government to be effective continue to be limited for the Inuit in Nunavut and the Sámi in Sápmi on the Norwegian side.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Gao, I-An
spellingShingle Gao, I-An
Indigenous Peoples’ Self-determination and Long-term Care: Sápmi and Nunavut
author_facet Gao, I-An
author_sort Gao, I-An
title Indigenous Peoples’ Self-determination and Long-term Care: Sápmi and Nunavut
title_short Indigenous Peoples’ Self-determination and Long-term Care: Sápmi and Nunavut
title_full Indigenous Peoples’ Self-determination and Long-term Care: Sápmi and Nunavut
title_fullStr Indigenous Peoples’ Self-determination and Long-term Care: Sápmi and Nunavut
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous Peoples’ Self-determination and Long-term Care: Sápmi and Nunavut
title_sort indigenous peoples’ self-determination and long-term care: sápmi and nunavut
publisher University of Sydney
publishDate 2018
url https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/SWPS/article/view/12415
geographic Arctic
Canada
Norway
Nunavut
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
Norway
Nunavut
genre Arctic
inuit
Nunavut
Sámi
genre_facet Arctic
inuit
Nunavut
Sámi
op_source Social Work & Policy Studies: Social Justice, Practice and Theory; Vol. 1 No. 001 (2018): Critical Engagements in Aging and Care
2209-0878
op_relation https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/SWPS/article/view/12415/11521
https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/SWPS/article/view/12415
op_rights Copyright (c) 2018 Social Work and Policy Studies: Social Justice, Practice and Theory
_version_ 1786193332951580672