Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object?

The ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon (“Treaty”) in 2009 was heralded as a new era. It was anticipated that the Treaty would usher in a qualitative change to policymaking in Europe. This would be achieved by rebalancing, or even recalibrating, the previous economic priorities found in earlier tre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Szyszczak, Erika
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Fordham University School of Law 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/46329/
http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/46329/1/Building_a_Socioeconomic_Constitution_A_Fantastic_Object_Szyszczak.pdf
http://fordhamilj.org/articles/building-a-socioeconomic-constitution-a-fantastic-object/
id ftunivsussex:oai:sro.sussex.ac.uk:46329
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivsussex:oai:sro.sussex.ac.uk:46329 2023-07-30T03:59:25+02:00 Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object? Szyszczak, Erika 2011 application/pdf http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/46329/ http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/46329/1/Building_a_Socioeconomic_Constitution_A_Fantastic_Object_Szyszczak.pdf http://fordhamilj.org/articles/building-a-socioeconomic-constitution-a-fantastic-object/ en eng Fordham University School of Law http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/46329/1/Building_a_Socioeconomic_Constitution_A_Fantastic_Object_Szyszczak.pdf Szyszczak, Erika (2011) Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object? Fordham Journal of International Law, 35. pp. 1364-1395. ISSN 0747-9395 KJ Europe KL-KWK Asia and Eurasia Africa Pacific Area and Antarctica Article PeerReviewed 2011 ftunivsussex 2023-07-11T20:26:04Z The ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon (“Treaty”) in 2009 was heralded as a new era. It was anticipated that the Treaty would usher in a qualitative change to policymaking in Europe. This would be achieved by rebalancing, or even recalibrating, the previous economic priorities found in earlier treaties with a set of social aims and values set out in Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty on European Union (“TEU”), tilting the European Union towards a social, as well as a liberal economic, constitution. The change of focus was not only attributable to a showdown between an Anglo-Saxon (liberal economic) versus French (prointerventionist) model for integration but also acknowledged the changes that have taken place in the European Union since the 1993 Treaty of Maastricht.[1] This Essay examines how the Treaty contributes to the evolution of a socioeconomic constitution for the European Union, resulting in a polity that contrasts dramatically with the original aims of the founding fathers of the European Economic Community (“EEC”). It also is shown that the economic backdrop to these changes has allowed economic and competitiveness issues to continue to dominate the policy agenda, and values of efficiency, modernization, and a “more economic approach” have permeated areas of social policy normally within the competence of the Member States. Cutbacks in public expenditure and other austerity measures create a test for the measure and effectiveness of the new era of socioeconomic values. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica University of Sussex: Sussex Research Online Pacific Tilting ENVELOPE(-54.065,-54.065,49.700,49.700)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Sussex: Sussex Research Online
op_collection_id ftunivsussex
language English
topic KJ Europe
KL-KWK Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
spellingShingle KJ Europe
KL-KWK Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
Szyszczak, Erika
Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object?
topic_facet KJ Europe
KL-KWK Asia and Eurasia
Africa
Pacific Area
and Antarctica
description The ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon (“Treaty”) in 2009 was heralded as a new era. It was anticipated that the Treaty would usher in a qualitative change to policymaking in Europe. This would be achieved by rebalancing, or even recalibrating, the previous economic priorities found in earlier treaties with a set of social aims and values set out in Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty on European Union (“TEU”), tilting the European Union towards a social, as well as a liberal economic, constitution. The change of focus was not only attributable to a showdown between an Anglo-Saxon (liberal economic) versus French (prointerventionist) model for integration but also acknowledged the changes that have taken place in the European Union since the 1993 Treaty of Maastricht.[1] This Essay examines how the Treaty contributes to the evolution of a socioeconomic constitution for the European Union, resulting in a polity that contrasts dramatically with the original aims of the founding fathers of the European Economic Community (“EEC”). It also is shown that the economic backdrop to these changes has allowed economic and competitiveness issues to continue to dominate the policy agenda, and values of efficiency, modernization, and a “more economic approach” have permeated areas of social policy normally within the competence of the Member States. Cutbacks in public expenditure and other austerity measures create a test for the measure and effectiveness of the new era of socioeconomic values.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Szyszczak, Erika
author_facet Szyszczak, Erika
author_sort Szyszczak, Erika
title Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object?
title_short Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object?
title_full Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object?
title_fullStr Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object?
title_full_unstemmed Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object?
title_sort building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object?
publisher Fordham University School of Law
publishDate 2011
url http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/46329/
http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/46329/1/Building_a_Socioeconomic_Constitution_A_Fantastic_Object_Szyszczak.pdf
http://fordhamilj.org/articles/building-a-socioeconomic-constitution-a-fantastic-object/
long_lat ENVELOPE(-54.065,-54.065,49.700,49.700)
geographic Pacific
Tilting
geographic_facet Pacific
Tilting
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_relation http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/46329/1/Building_a_Socioeconomic_Constitution_A_Fantastic_Object_Szyszczak.pdf
Szyszczak, Erika (2011) Building a socioeconomic constitution: a fantastic object? Fordham Journal of International Law, 35. pp. 1364-1395. ISSN 0747-9395
_version_ 1772810233900433408