Renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: Case studies from the United States

Fisheries and aquaculture are highly reliant on fossil fuels and must transition to renewable energy to reduce carbon emissions and meet global planetary heath goals. Here, we assessed total and renewable energy use in farmed catfish and wild-caught salmon, two of the largest seafood sectors in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Cleaner Production
Main Authors: Scroggins, Rachel E., Fry, Jillian P., Brown, Mark T., Neff, Roni A., Asche, Frank, Anderson, James L., Love, David C.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022
Subjects:
Eia
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3060628
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134153
id ftunivstavanger:oai:uis.brage.unit.no:11250/3060628
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivstavanger:oai:uis.brage.unit.no:11250/3060628 2023-06-11T04:16:02+02:00 Renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: Case studies from the United States Scroggins, Rachel E. Fry, Jillian P. Brown, Mark T. Neff, Roni A. Asche, Frank Anderson, James L. Love, David C. 2022-11-16T11:31:22Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3060628 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134153 eng eng Elsevier Scroggins, R. E., Fry, J. P., Brown, M. T., Neff, R. A., Asche, F., Anderson, J. L., & Love, D. C. (2022). Renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: Case studies from the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, 376, 134153. urn:issn:0959-6526 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3060628 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134153 cristin:2074746 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no The authors 376 Journal of Cleaner Production VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900 Peer reviewed Journal article 2022 ftunivstavanger https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134153 2023-05-29T16:03:24Z Fisheries and aquaculture are highly reliant on fossil fuels and must transition to renewable energy to reduce carbon emissions and meet global planetary heath goals. Here, we assessed total and renewable energy use in farmed catfish and wild-caught salmon, two of the largest seafood sectors in the United States (U.S.). Interviews were used to explore participants’ views of key barriers and opportunities to replace fossil fuel use. Modeled scenarios were used to assess changes in grid source energy and electricity costs for the farmed catfish sector using the U.S. EIA National Energy Modeling System. We found that renewable energy makes up 5% of direct energy use in catfish aquaculture in Mississippi and Alabama. Catfish industry interviewees indicate that cheap electricity costs and diurnal energy use are barriers to onsite implementation of renewables. Projected renewable energy use for the catfish sector could be as high as 41% of total direct energy use in 2050 under modeled scenarios, which would result in 86% lower CO2 emissions but 34% higher electricity costs. For wild-capture pink salmon from Prince William Sound, Alaska (AK) and sockeye salmon from Bristol Bay, AK, renewable energy makes up 2% and 0% of direct energy use, respectively. Wild-caught salmon industry interviewees identified the short duration of the fishing season as a barrier for onsite renewable energy, though there is a desire for more regional renewable energy technologies to lower electricity costs and increase reliability. Proposed renewable energy projects at utilities in fish processing towns in AK would only make modest improvements in the share of direct energy from renewables due to fuel use by fishing vessels. This is the first study to characterize current and potential renewable energy use among parts of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors in the U.S. We found that energy needs for fisheries and aquaculture are influenced by their often-remote location, production methods, and seasonal energy demands, which require ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Pink salmon Alaska University of Stavanger: UiS Brage Alabama Sockeye ENVELOPE(-130.143,-130.143,54.160,54.160) Eia ENVELOPE(7.755,7.755,63.024,63.024) Journal of Cleaner Production 376 134153
institution Open Polar
collection University of Stavanger: UiS Brage
op_collection_id ftunivstavanger
language English
topic VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900
spellingShingle VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900
Scroggins, Rachel E.
Fry, Jillian P.
Brown, Mark T.
Neff, Roni A.
Asche, Frank
Anderson, James L.
Love, David C.
Renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: Case studies from the United States
topic_facet VDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900
description Fisheries and aquaculture are highly reliant on fossil fuels and must transition to renewable energy to reduce carbon emissions and meet global planetary heath goals. Here, we assessed total and renewable energy use in farmed catfish and wild-caught salmon, two of the largest seafood sectors in the United States (U.S.). Interviews were used to explore participants’ views of key barriers and opportunities to replace fossil fuel use. Modeled scenarios were used to assess changes in grid source energy and electricity costs for the farmed catfish sector using the U.S. EIA National Energy Modeling System. We found that renewable energy makes up 5% of direct energy use in catfish aquaculture in Mississippi and Alabama. Catfish industry interviewees indicate that cheap electricity costs and diurnal energy use are barriers to onsite implementation of renewables. Projected renewable energy use for the catfish sector could be as high as 41% of total direct energy use in 2050 under modeled scenarios, which would result in 86% lower CO2 emissions but 34% higher electricity costs. For wild-capture pink salmon from Prince William Sound, Alaska (AK) and sockeye salmon from Bristol Bay, AK, renewable energy makes up 2% and 0% of direct energy use, respectively. Wild-caught salmon industry interviewees identified the short duration of the fishing season as a barrier for onsite renewable energy, though there is a desire for more regional renewable energy technologies to lower electricity costs and increase reliability. Proposed renewable energy projects at utilities in fish processing towns in AK would only make modest improvements in the share of direct energy from renewables due to fuel use by fishing vessels. This is the first study to characterize current and potential renewable energy use among parts of the fisheries and aquaculture sectors in the U.S. We found that energy needs for fisheries and aquaculture are influenced by their often-remote location, production methods, and seasonal energy demands, which require ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Scroggins, Rachel E.
Fry, Jillian P.
Brown, Mark T.
Neff, Roni A.
Asche, Frank
Anderson, James L.
Love, David C.
author_facet Scroggins, Rachel E.
Fry, Jillian P.
Brown, Mark T.
Neff, Roni A.
Asche, Frank
Anderson, James L.
Love, David C.
author_sort Scroggins, Rachel E.
title Renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: Case studies from the United States
title_short Renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: Case studies from the United States
title_full Renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: Case studies from the United States
title_fullStr Renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: Case studies from the United States
title_full_unstemmed Renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: Case studies from the United States
title_sort renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: case studies from the united states
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2022
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3060628
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134153
long_lat ENVELOPE(-130.143,-130.143,54.160,54.160)
ENVELOPE(7.755,7.755,63.024,63.024)
geographic Alabama
Sockeye
Eia
geographic_facet Alabama
Sockeye
Eia
genre Pink salmon
Alaska
genre_facet Pink salmon
Alaska
op_source 376
Journal of Cleaner Production
op_relation Scroggins, R. E., Fry, J. P., Brown, M. T., Neff, R. A., Asche, F., Anderson, J. L., & Love, D. C. (2022). Renewable energy in fisheries and aquaculture: Case studies from the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, 376, 134153.
urn:issn:0959-6526
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3060628
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134153
cristin:2074746
op_rights Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
The authors
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134153
container_title Journal of Cleaner Production
container_volume 376
container_start_page 134153
_version_ 1768373387165433856