The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea

Five seismic interpretation experiments were conducted on an area of interest containing a fault relay in the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea, Norway, to understand how the interpretation method impacts the analysis of fault and horizon morphologies, fault lengths, and throw. The resulting horizon and fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Solid Earth
Main Authors: Cunningham, Jennifer Elizabeth, Cardozo, Nestor, Townsend, Christopher, Callow, Richard H. T.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050830
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-741-2021
id ftunivstavanger:oai:uis.brage.unit.no:11250/3050830
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivstavanger:oai:uis.brage.unit.no:11250/3050830 2023-06-11T04:10:33+02:00 The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea Cunningham, Jennifer Elizabeth Cardozo, Nestor Townsend, Christopher Callow, Richard H. T. 2021-12-08T15:39:36Z application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050830 https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-741-2021 eng eng Copernicus Publications Cunningham, J. E., Cardozo, N., Townsend, C., & Callow, R. H. (2021). The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea. Solid Earth, 12(3), 741-764. urn:issn:1869-9510 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050830 https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-741-2021 cristin:1966335 Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no The authors 741-764 12 Solid Earth (SE) VDP::Teknologi: 500 Peer reviewed Journal article 2021 ftunivstavanger https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-741-2021 2023-05-29T16:02:53Z Five seismic interpretation experiments were conducted on an area of interest containing a fault relay in the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea, Norway, to understand how the interpretation method impacts the analysis of fault and horizon morphologies, fault lengths, and throw. The resulting horizon and fault interpretations from the least and most successful interpretation methods were further analysed to understand their impact on geological modelling and hydrocarbon volume calculation. Generally, the least dense manual interpretation method of horizons (32 inlines and 32 crosslines; 32 ILs × 32 XLs, 400 m) and faults (32 ILs, 400 m) resulted in inaccurate fault and horizon interpretations and underdeveloped relay morphologies and throw, which are inadequate for any detailed geological analysis. The densest fault interpretations (4 ILs, 50 m) and 3D auto-tracked horizons (all ILs and XLs spaced 12.5 m) provided the most detailed interpretations, most developed relay and fault morphologies, and geologically realistic throw distributions. Sparse interpretation grids generate significant issues in the model itself, which make it geologically inaccurate and lead to misunderstanding of the structural evolution of the relay. Despite significant differences between the two models, the calculated in-place petroleum reserves are broadly similar in the least and most dense experiments. However, when considered at field scale, the differences in volumes that are generated by the contrasting interpretation methodologies clearly demonstrate the importance of applying accurate interpretation strategies. publishedVersion Article in Journal/Newspaper Barents Sea Snøhvit University of Stavanger: UiS Brage Barents Sea Norway Solid Earth 12 3 741 764
institution Open Polar
collection University of Stavanger: UiS Brage
op_collection_id ftunivstavanger
language English
topic VDP::Teknologi: 500
spellingShingle VDP::Teknologi: 500
Cunningham, Jennifer Elizabeth
Cardozo, Nestor
Townsend, Christopher
Callow, Richard H. T.
The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea
topic_facet VDP::Teknologi: 500
description Five seismic interpretation experiments were conducted on an area of interest containing a fault relay in the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea, Norway, to understand how the interpretation method impacts the analysis of fault and horizon morphologies, fault lengths, and throw. The resulting horizon and fault interpretations from the least and most successful interpretation methods were further analysed to understand their impact on geological modelling and hydrocarbon volume calculation. Generally, the least dense manual interpretation method of horizons (32 inlines and 32 crosslines; 32 ILs × 32 XLs, 400 m) and faults (32 ILs, 400 m) resulted in inaccurate fault and horizon interpretations and underdeveloped relay morphologies and throw, which are inadequate for any detailed geological analysis. The densest fault interpretations (4 ILs, 50 m) and 3D auto-tracked horizons (all ILs and XLs spaced 12.5 m) provided the most detailed interpretations, most developed relay and fault morphologies, and geologically realistic throw distributions. Sparse interpretation grids generate significant issues in the model itself, which make it geologically inaccurate and lead to misunderstanding of the structural evolution of the relay. Despite significant differences between the two models, the calculated in-place petroleum reserves are broadly similar in the least and most dense experiments. However, when considered at field scale, the differences in volumes that are generated by the contrasting interpretation methodologies clearly demonstrate the importance of applying accurate interpretation strategies. publishedVersion
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cunningham, Jennifer Elizabeth
Cardozo, Nestor
Townsend, Christopher
Callow, Richard H. T.
author_facet Cunningham, Jennifer Elizabeth
Cardozo, Nestor
Townsend, Christopher
Callow, Richard H. T.
author_sort Cunningham, Jennifer Elizabeth
title The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea
title_short The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea
title_full The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea
title_fullStr The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea
title_full_unstemmed The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea
title_sort impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the snøhvit field, barents sea
publisher Copernicus Publications
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050830
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-741-2021
geographic Barents Sea
Norway
geographic_facet Barents Sea
Norway
genre Barents Sea
Snøhvit
genre_facet Barents Sea
Snøhvit
op_source 741-764
12
Solid Earth (SE)
op_relation Cunningham, J. E., Cardozo, N., Townsend, C., & Callow, R. H. (2021). The impact of seismic interpretation methods on the analysis of faults: a case study from the Snøhvit field, Barents Sea. Solid Earth, 12(3), 741-764.
urn:issn:1869-9510
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050830
https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-741-2021
cristin:1966335
op_rights Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
The authors
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/se-12-741-2021
container_title Solid Earth
container_volume 12
container_issue 3
container_start_page 741
op_container_end_page 764
_version_ 1768385027669753856