How widespread is the usage of the Northern Sea Route as a commercially viable shipping route?:A statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data

We critically examined the usage of Northern Sea Route (NSR) during the 8 year period from 2011 to 2018, using empirical data collected from the NSR Administration (NSRA), Center for High North Logistics (CHNL) and Equasis databases, together with scholarship available in the public domain to determ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Policy
Main Authors: Rajagopal, Sriram, Zhang, Pengfei
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pure.solent.ac.uk/en/publications/d49c55f1-6ea0-4c3c-b740-ab023d44f784
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104300
https://pure.solent.ac.uk/ws/files/17169553/How_widespread_is_the_usage_of_the_Northern_Sea_Route_as_a_commercially_viable_shipping_route.pdf
https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3bae83a0-ff37-3479-a165-9beaec7e7775/
id ftunivsolentcris:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/d49c55f1-6ea0-4c3c-b740-ab023d44f784
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivsolentcris:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/d49c55f1-6ea0-4c3c-b740-ab023d44f784 2023-05-15T15:10:29+02:00 How widespread is the usage of the Northern Sea Route as a commercially viable shipping route?:A statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data Rajagopal, Sriram Zhang, Pengfei 2020-11-24 application/pdf https://pure.solent.ac.uk/en/publications/d49c55f1-6ea0-4c3c-b740-ab023d44f784 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104300 https://pure.solent.ac.uk/ws/files/17169553/How_widespread_is_the_usage_of_the_Northern_Sea_Route_as_a_commercially_viable_shipping_route.pdf https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3bae83a0-ff37-3479-a165-9beaec7e7775/ eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Rajagopal , S & Zhang , P 2020 , ' How widespread is the usage of the Northern Sea Route as a commercially viable shipping route? A statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data ' , Marine Policy . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104300 article 2020 ftunivsolentcris https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104300 2022-11-16T17:42:08Z We critically examined the usage of Northern Sea Route (NSR) during the 8 year period from 2011 to 2018, using empirical data collected from the NSR Administration (NSRA), Center for High North Logistics (CHNL) and Equasis databases, together with scholarship available in the public domain to determine its commercial usage. We find that NSR transit numbers have generally been low (μ=34 transits per year), varying between 71 transits per year (in 2013), 18 transits (in 2015, 2016), and 27 transits each in 2017 and 2018. On an aggregate basis, tankers and dry cargo ships have been the largest users of the NSR (123 and 122 transits respectively, accounting for 82% of all transits), followed by ice breakers, OSVs and SAR vessels (12% or 35 transits). Only 15 transits (5%) were by passenger, cruise and research ships followed by coastguard and fishing vessel (1%). Factors preventing its wider adoption include the comparatively lesser, but still existent presence of sea ice thus constituting a hazard to navigation, few cargo ports along the NSR, higher insurance premiums, inadequate coverage of charts, inadequate SAR facilities, the need for ice breaker assistance and resultant higher transit costs. Due to the presence of ice, NSR was open for navigation for < 155 days each year (132 days in 2018). Due to these pertinacious obstacles to safe navigation, the thinning of arctic ice has not resulted in waters sufficiently free of ice to enable safe commercially viable passage of commercial conventional cargo ships. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Northern Sea Route Sea ice Research at Solent University Arctic Breaker ENVELOPE(-67.257,-67.257,-67.874,-67.874) Marine Policy 125 104300
institution Open Polar
collection Research at Solent University
op_collection_id ftunivsolentcris
language English
description We critically examined the usage of Northern Sea Route (NSR) during the 8 year period from 2011 to 2018, using empirical data collected from the NSR Administration (NSRA), Center for High North Logistics (CHNL) and Equasis databases, together with scholarship available in the public domain to determine its commercial usage. We find that NSR transit numbers have generally been low (μ=34 transits per year), varying between 71 transits per year (in 2013), 18 transits (in 2015, 2016), and 27 transits each in 2017 and 2018. On an aggregate basis, tankers and dry cargo ships have been the largest users of the NSR (123 and 122 transits respectively, accounting for 82% of all transits), followed by ice breakers, OSVs and SAR vessels (12% or 35 transits). Only 15 transits (5%) were by passenger, cruise and research ships followed by coastguard and fishing vessel (1%). Factors preventing its wider adoption include the comparatively lesser, but still existent presence of sea ice thus constituting a hazard to navigation, few cargo ports along the NSR, higher insurance premiums, inadequate coverage of charts, inadequate SAR facilities, the need for ice breaker assistance and resultant higher transit costs. Due to the presence of ice, NSR was open for navigation for < 155 days each year (132 days in 2018). Due to these pertinacious obstacles to safe navigation, the thinning of arctic ice has not resulted in waters sufficiently free of ice to enable safe commercially viable passage of commercial conventional cargo ships.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Rajagopal, Sriram
Zhang, Pengfei
spellingShingle Rajagopal, Sriram
Zhang, Pengfei
How widespread is the usage of the Northern Sea Route as a commercially viable shipping route?:A statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data
author_facet Rajagopal, Sriram
Zhang, Pengfei
author_sort Rajagopal, Sriram
title How widespread is the usage of the Northern Sea Route as a commercially viable shipping route?:A statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data
title_short How widespread is the usage of the Northern Sea Route as a commercially viable shipping route?:A statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data
title_full How widespread is the usage of the Northern Sea Route as a commercially viable shipping route?:A statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data
title_fullStr How widespread is the usage of the Northern Sea Route as a commercially viable shipping route?:A statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data
title_full_unstemmed How widespread is the usage of the Northern Sea Route as a commercially viable shipping route?:A statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data
title_sort how widespread is the usage of the northern sea route as a commercially viable shipping route?:a statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data
publishDate 2020
url https://pure.solent.ac.uk/en/publications/d49c55f1-6ea0-4c3c-b740-ab023d44f784
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104300
https://pure.solent.ac.uk/ws/files/17169553/How_widespread_is_the_usage_of_the_Northern_Sea_Route_as_a_commercially_viable_shipping_route.pdf
https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3bae83a0-ff37-3479-a165-9beaec7e7775/
long_lat ENVELOPE(-67.257,-67.257,-67.874,-67.874)
geographic Arctic
Breaker
geographic_facet Arctic
Breaker
genre Arctic
Northern Sea Route
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Northern Sea Route
Sea ice
op_source Rajagopal , S & Zhang , P 2020 , ' How widespread is the usage of the Northern Sea Route as a commercially viable shipping route? A statistical analysis of ship transits from 2011 to 2018 based on empirical data ' , Marine Policy . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104300
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104300
container_title Marine Policy
container_volume 125
container_start_page 104300
_version_ 1766341513442230272