The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity

Patterns of environmental spatial structure lie at the heart of the most fundamental and familiar patterns of diversity on Earth. Antarctica contains some of the strongest environmental gradients on the planet and therefore provides an ideal study ground to test hypotheses on the relevance of enviro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological Monographs
Main Authors: Convey P., Chown S. L., Clarke A., Barnes D. K. A., Bokhorst S., Cummings V., Ducklow H. W., FRATI, FRANCESCO, Green T. G., Gordon S., Griffiths H. J., Howard Williams C., Huiskes A. H. L., Laybourn Parry J., Berry Lyons W., McMinn A., Morley S. A., Pek L. S., Quesada A., Robinson S. A., Schiapparelli S., Wall D. H.
Other Authors: Convey, P., Chown, S. L., Clarke, A., Barnes, D. K. A., Bokhorst, S., Cummings, V., Ducklow, H. W., Frati, Francesco, Green, T. G., Gordon, S., Griffiths, H. J., Howard Williams, C., Huiskes, A. H. L., Laybourn Parry, J., Berry Lyons, W., Mcminn, A., Morley, S. A., Pek, L. S., Quesada, A., Robinson, S. A., Schiapparelli, S., Wall, D. H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11365/47725
https://doi.org/10.1890/12-2216.1
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/12-2216.1
id ftunivsiena:oai:usiena-air.unisi.it:11365/47725
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivsiena:oai:usiena-air.unisi.it:11365/47725 2024-02-11T09:58:10+01:00 The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity Convey P. Chown S. L. Clarke A. Barnes D. K. A. Bokhorst S. Cummings V. Ducklow H. W. FRATI, FRANCESCO Green T. G. Gordon S. Griffiths H. J. Howard Williams C. Huiskes A. H. L. Laybourn Parry J. Berry Lyons W. McMinn A. Morley S. A. Pek L. S. Quesada A. Robinson S. A. Schiapparelli S. Wall D. H. Convey, P. Chown, S. L. Clarke, A. Barnes, D. K. A. Bokhorst, S. Cummings, V. Ducklow, H. W. Frati, Francesco Green, T. G. Gordon, S. Griffiths, H. J. Howard Williams, C. Huiskes, A. H. L. Laybourn Parry, J. Berry Lyons, W. Mcminn, A. Morley, S. A. Pek, L. S. Quesada, A. Robinson, S. A. Schiapparelli, S. Wall, D. H. 2014 STAMPA http://hdl.handle.net/11365/47725 https://doi.org/10.1890/12-2216.1 https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/12-2216.1 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000335859700002 volume:84 issue:2 firstpage:203 lastpage:244 numberofpages:42 journal:ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS http://hdl.handle.net/11365/47725 doi:10.1890/12-2216.1 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-84903581904 https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/12-2216.1 info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess Adaptation biogeography environmental gradient historical contingency marine spatial scale and variation terrestrial environments info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2014 ftunivsiena https://doi.org/10.1890/12-2216.1 2024-01-23T23:14:43Z Patterns of environmental spatial structure lie at the heart of the most fundamental and familiar patterns of diversity on Earth. Antarctica contains some of the strongest environmental gradients on the planet and therefore provides an ideal study ground to test hypotheses on the relevance of environmental variability for biodiversity. To answer the pivotal question, “How does spatial variation in physical and biological environmental properties across the Antarctic drive biodiversity?” we have synthesized current knowledge on environmental variability across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine Antarctic biomes and related this to the observed biotic patterns. The most important physical driver of Antarctic terrestrial communities is the availability of liquid water, itself driven by solar irradiance intensity. Patterns of biota distribution are further strongly influenced by the historical development of any given location or region, and by geographical barriers. In freshwater ecosystems, free water is also crucial, with further important influences from salinity, nutrient availability, oxygenation, and characteristics of ice cover and extent. In the marine biome there does not appear to be one major driving force, with the exception of the oceanographic boundary of the Polar Front. At smaller spatial scales, ice cover, ice scour, and salinity gradients are clearly important determinants of diversity at habitat and community level. Stochastic and extreme events remain an important driving force in all environments, particularly in the context of local extinction and colonization or recolonization, as well as that of temporal environmental variability. Our synthesis demonstrates that the Antarctic continent and surrounding oceans provide an ideal study ground to develop new biogeographical models, including life history and physiological traits, and to address questions regarding biological responses to environmental variability and change. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Università degli Studi di Siena: USiena air Antarctic The Antarctic Ecological Monographs 84 2 203 244
institution Open Polar
collection Università degli Studi di Siena: USiena air
op_collection_id ftunivsiena
language English
topic Adaptation
biogeography
environmental gradient
historical contingency
marine
spatial scale and variation
terrestrial environments
spellingShingle Adaptation
biogeography
environmental gradient
historical contingency
marine
spatial scale and variation
terrestrial environments
Convey P.
Chown S. L.
Clarke A.
Barnes D. K. A.
Bokhorst S.
Cummings V.
Ducklow H. W.
FRATI, FRANCESCO
Green T. G.
Gordon S.
Griffiths H. J.
Howard Williams C.
Huiskes A. H. L.
Laybourn Parry J.
Berry Lyons W.
McMinn A.
Morley S. A.
Pek L. S.
Quesada A.
Robinson S. A.
Schiapparelli S.
Wall D. H.
The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity
topic_facet Adaptation
biogeography
environmental gradient
historical contingency
marine
spatial scale and variation
terrestrial environments
description Patterns of environmental spatial structure lie at the heart of the most fundamental and familiar patterns of diversity on Earth. Antarctica contains some of the strongest environmental gradients on the planet and therefore provides an ideal study ground to test hypotheses on the relevance of environmental variability for biodiversity. To answer the pivotal question, “How does spatial variation in physical and biological environmental properties across the Antarctic drive biodiversity?” we have synthesized current knowledge on environmental variability across terrestrial, freshwater, and marine Antarctic biomes and related this to the observed biotic patterns. The most important physical driver of Antarctic terrestrial communities is the availability of liquid water, itself driven by solar irradiance intensity. Patterns of biota distribution are further strongly influenced by the historical development of any given location or region, and by geographical barriers. In freshwater ecosystems, free water is also crucial, with further important influences from salinity, nutrient availability, oxygenation, and characteristics of ice cover and extent. In the marine biome there does not appear to be one major driving force, with the exception of the oceanographic boundary of the Polar Front. At smaller spatial scales, ice cover, ice scour, and salinity gradients are clearly important determinants of diversity at habitat and community level. Stochastic and extreme events remain an important driving force in all environments, particularly in the context of local extinction and colonization or recolonization, as well as that of temporal environmental variability. Our synthesis demonstrates that the Antarctic continent and surrounding oceans provide an ideal study ground to develop new biogeographical models, including life history and physiological traits, and to address questions regarding biological responses to environmental variability and change.
author2 Convey, P.
Chown, S. L.
Clarke, A.
Barnes, D. K. A.
Bokhorst, S.
Cummings, V.
Ducklow, H. W.
Frati, Francesco
Green, T. G.
Gordon, S.
Griffiths, H. J.
Howard Williams, C.
Huiskes, A. H. L.
Laybourn Parry, J.
Berry Lyons, W.
Mcminn, A.
Morley, S. A.
Pek, L. S.
Quesada, A.
Robinson, S. A.
Schiapparelli, S.
Wall, D. H.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Convey P.
Chown S. L.
Clarke A.
Barnes D. K. A.
Bokhorst S.
Cummings V.
Ducklow H. W.
FRATI, FRANCESCO
Green T. G.
Gordon S.
Griffiths H. J.
Howard Williams C.
Huiskes A. H. L.
Laybourn Parry J.
Berry Lyons W.
McMinn A.
Morley S. A.
Pek L. S.
Quesada A.
Robinson S. A.
Schiapparelli S.
Wall D. H.
author_facet Convey P.
Chown S. L.
Clarke A.
Barnes D. K. A.
Bokhorst S.
Cummings V.
Ducklow H. W.
FRATI, FRANCESCO
Green T. G.
Gordon S.
Griffiths H. J.
Howard Williams C.
Huiskes A. H. L.
Laybourn Parry J.
Berry Lyons W.
McMinn A.
Morley S. A.
Pek L. S.
Quesada A.
Robinson S. A.
Schiapparelli S.
Wall D. H.
author_sort Convey P.
title The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity
title_short The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity
title_full The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity
title_fullStr The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity
title_full_unstemmed The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity
title_sort spatial structure of antarctic biodiversity
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/11365/47725
https://doi.org/10.1890/12-2216.1
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/12-2216.1
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000335859700002
volume:84
issue:2
firstpage:203
lastpage:244
numberofpages:42
journal:ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS
http://hdl.handle.net/11365/47725
doi:10.1890/12-2216.1
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-84903581904
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/12-2216.1
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1890/12-2216.1
container_title Ecological Monographs
container_volume 84
container_issue 2
container_start_page 203
op_container_end_page 244
_version_ 1790593760285949952