Upscaling Collaborative Crisis Management: A Comparison of Wildfire Responder Networks in Canada and Sweden

One recurrent challenge during major crises and emergencies is how to effectively scale up the response. This involves efforts to expand the number of organizations involved to ensure access to resources, coordination of information and decisions, and joint actions to minimize costs and risks and to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nohrstedt, Daniel, Baird, Julia, Bodin, Orjan, Plummer, Ryan, Summers, Robert
Format: Book Part
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244308
id ftunivscoast:usc:31055
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivscoast:usc:31055 2023-05-15T16:17:39+02:00 Upscaling Collaborative Crisis Management: A Comparison of Wildfire Responder Networks in Canada and Sweden Nohrstedt, Daniel Baird, Julia Bodin, Orjan Plummer, Ryan Summers, Robert 2020 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244308 eng eng Routledge usc:31055 URN:ISBN: 9780429244308 FoR 0502 (Environmental Science and Management) FoR 1604 (Human Geography) Book Chapter 2020 ftunivscoast https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244308 2020-05-18T22:26:11Z One recurrent challenge during major crises and emergencies is how to effectively scale up the response. This involves efforts to expand the number of organizations involved to ensure access to resources, coordination of information and decisions, and joint actions to minimize costs and risks and to restore order. At the same time, upscaling requires difficult decisions about the timing and proper design of crisis responder organizations. In addition, it is generally challenging to orchestrate collaboration among diverse actors from different organizations with different cultures, missions, and experiences. This chapter demonstrates the dynamics of upscaling during two major wildfires in Canada (Fort McMurray, 2016) and Sweden (Västmanland, 2014). We detail the course of events leading up to the activation of joint crisis response organizations and shed light on the formal process of upscaling, how upscaling played out in practice, and how actors perceived performance. The comparison between the two cases demonstrates that although crisis management in Canada and Sweden is organized in different ways, similar challenges emerged in relation to upscaling. We find that differences in perceptions of the situation and divergent beliefs about the sufficiency of local capacities lead to different understandings of the necessity and timing of upscaling. Book Part Fort McMurray University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia: COAST Research Database Canada Fort McMurray
institution Open Polar
collection University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia: COAST Research Database
op_collection_id ftunivscoast
language English
topic FoR 0502 (Environmental Science and Management)
FoR 1604 (Human Geography)
spellingShingle FoR 0502 (Environmental Science and Management)
FoR 1604 (Human Geography)
Nohrstedt, Daniel
Baird, Julia
Bodin, Orjan
Plummer, Ryan
Summers, Robert
Upscaling Collaborative Crisis Management: A Comparison of Wildfire Responder Networks in Canada and Sweden
topic_facet FoR 0502 (Environmental Science and Management)
FoR 1604 (Human Geography)
description One recurrent challenge during major crises and emergencies is how to effectively scale up the response. This involves efforts to expand the number of organizations involved to ensure access to resources, coordination of information and decisions, and joint actions to minimize costs and risks and to restore order. At the same time, upscaling requires difficult decisions about the timing and proper design of crisis responder organizations. In addition, it is generally challenging to orchestrate collaboration among diverse actors from different organizations with different cultures, missions, and experiences. This chapter demonstrates the dynamics of upscaling during two major wildfires in Canada (Fort McMurray, 2016) and Sweden (Västmanland, 2014). We detail the course of events leading up to the activation of joint crisis response organizations and shed light on the formal process of upscaling, how upscaling played out in practice, and how actors perceived performance. The comparison between the two cases demonstrates that although crisis management in Canada and Sweden is organized in different ways, similar challenges emerged in relation to upscaling. We find that differences in perceptions of the situation and divergent beliefs about the sufficiency of local capacities lead to different understandings of the necessity and timing of upscaling.
format Book Part
author Nohrstedt, Daniel
Baird, Julia
Bodin, Orjan
Plummer, Ryan
Summers, Robert
author_facet Nohrstedt, Daniel
Baird, Julia
Bodin, Orjan
Plummer, Ryan
Summers, Robert
author_sort Nohrstedt, Daniel
title Upscaling Collaborative Crisis Management: A Comparison of Wildfire Responder Networks in Canada and Sweden
title_short Upscaling Collaborative Crisis Management: A Comparison of Wildfire Responder Networks in Canada and Sweden
title_full Upscaling Collaborative Crisis Management: A Comparison of Wildfire Responder Networks in Canada and Sweden
title_fullStr Upscaling Collaborative Crisis Management: A Comparison of Wildfire Responder Networks in Canada and Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Upscaling Collaborative Crisis Management: A Comparison of Wildfire Responder Networks in Canada and Sweden
title_sort upscaling collaborative crisis management: a comparison of wildfire responder networks in canada and sweden
publisher Routledge
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244308
geographic Canada
Fort McMurray
geographic_facet Canada
Fort McMurray
genre Fort McMurray
genre_facet Fort McMurray
op_relation usc:31055
URN:ISBN: 9780429244308
op_doi https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244308
_version_ 1766003538464342016