Quantitative comparison of Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) tip resistance data with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) amplitude data

Both cone penetration test (CPT) tip resistance data and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) amplitude data vary at the interface of snow layers of different density. Therefore, relationships between these data should be observable, enabling spatial extrapolation of CPT tip resistance values using GPR. Q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Cold Regions Engineering
Main Author: McCallum, A B
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Society of Civil Engineers 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000206
id ftunivscoast:usc:30873
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivscoast:usc:30873 2023-05-15T13:56:25+02:00 Quantitative comparison of Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) tip resistance data with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) amplitude data McCallum, A B 2020 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000206 eng eng American Society of Civil Engineers usc:30873 URN:ISSN: 0887-381X FoR 0905 (Civil Engineering) Journal Article 2020 ftunivscoast https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000206 2020-03-30T22:26:00Z Both cone penetration test (CPT) tip resistance data and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) amplitude data vary at the interface of snow layers of different density. Therefore, relationships between these data should be observable, enabling spatial extrapolation of CPT tip resistance values using GPR. Quantitative analysis of GPR amplitude data occurs in pavement analysis, but these techniques have not been applied to snow. GPR sounding using a commercially available ground-coupled 400 MHz antenna was conducted in the immediate vicinity of numerous CPT holes in Antarctic firn. Comparison between CPT tip resistance and GPR amplitude data reveals that extrapolation of point CPT resistance data is possible over large spatial areas by tracking GPR horizons that equate with CPT resistance value. In addition, GPR amplitude and polarity can reveal information about relative snowpack density. GPR can be used efficaciously with CPT snow resistance data, enabling efficient extrapolation of snow physical properties across large areas. Complementary use of GPR with CPT can enhance site investigation procedures for the development of polar infrastructure. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia: COAST Research Database Antarctic Journal of Cold Regions Engineering 34 2 04020003
institution Open Polar
collection University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia: COAST Research Database
op_collection_id ftunivscoast
language English
topic FoR 0905 (Civil Engineering)
spellingShingle FoR 0905 (Civil Engineering)
McCallum, A B
Quantitative comparison of Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) tip resistance data with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) amplitude data
topic_facet FoR 0905 (Civil Engineering)
description Both cone penetration test (CPT) tip resistance data and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) amplitude data vary at the interface of snow layers of different density. Therefore, relationships between these data should be observable, enabling spatial extrapolation of CPT tip resistance values using GPR. Quantitative analysis of GPR amplitude data occurs in pavement analysis, but these techniques have not been applied to snow. GPR sounding using a commercially available ground-coupled 400 MHz antenna was conducted in the immediate vicinity of numerous CPT holes in Antarctic firn. Comparison between CPT tip resistance and GPR amplitude data reveals that extrapolation of point CPT resistance data is possible over large spatial areas by tracking GPR horizons that equate with CPT resistance value. In addition, GPR amplitude and polarity can reveal information about relative snowpack density. GPR can be used efficaciously with CPT snow resistance data, enabling efficient extrapolation of snow physical properties across large areas. Complementary use of GPR with CPT can enhance site investigation procedures for the development of polar infrastructure.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author McCallum, A B
author_facet McCallum, A B
author_sort McCallum, A B
title Quantitative comparison of Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) tip resistance data with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) amplitude data
title_short Quantitative comparison of Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) tip resistance data with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) amplitude data
title_full Quantitative comparison of Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) tip resistance data with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) amplitude data
title_fullStr Quantitative comparison of Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) tip resistance data with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) amplitude data
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative comparison of Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) tip resistance data with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) amplitude data
title_sort quantitative comparison of cone penetration testing (cpt) tip resistance data with ground penetrating radar (gpr) amplitude data
publisher American Society of Civil Engineers
publishDate 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000206
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_relation usc:30873
URN:ISSN: 0887-381X
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000206
container_title Journal of Cold Regions Engineering
container_volume 34
container_issue 2
container_start_page 04020003
_version_ 1766263920854564864