Participatory scenario planning and climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research in the Arctic

Participatory scenario planning (PSP) approaches are increasingly being used in research on climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability (IAV). We identify and evaluate how PSP has been used in IAV studies in the Arctic, reviewing work published in the peer-reviewed and grey literature (n =...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Science & Policy
Main Authors: Flynn, Melanie, Ford, James D, Pearce, T, Harper, Sherilee L, IHACC Research Team
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.012
id ftunivscoast:usc:24452
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivscoast:usc:24452 2023-05-15T14:50:54+02:00 Participatory scenario planning and climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research in the Arctic Flynn, Melanie Ford, James D Pearce, T Harper, Sherilee L IHACC Research Team 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.012 eng eng Elsevier Inc. usc:24452 URN:ISSN: 1462-9011 Copyright © 2017. Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ CC-BY-NC-ND FoR 05 (Environmental Sciences) FoR 16 (Studies in Human Society) FoR 07 (Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences) participatory scenario planning Arctic climate change impacts adaptation vulnerability Journal Article 2018 ftunivscoast https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.012 2020-06-01T22:26:14Z Participatory scenario planning (PSP) approaches are increasingly being used in research on climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability (IAV). We identify and evaluate how PSP has been used in IAV studies in the Arctic, reviewing work published in the peer-reviewed and grey literature (n = 43). Studies utilizing PSP commonly follow the stages recognized as ‘best practice’ in the general literature in scenario planning, engaging with multiple ways of knowing including western science and traditional knowledge, and are employed in a diversity of sectors. Community participation, however, varies between studies, and climate projections are only utilized in just over half of the studies reviewed, raising concern that important future drivers of change are not fully captured. The time required to conduct PSP, involving extensive community engagement, was consistently reported as a challenge, and for application in Indigenous communities requires careful consideration of local culture, values, and belief systems on what it means to prepare for future climate impacts. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Climate change University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia: COAST Research Database Arctic Environmental Science & Policy 79 45 53
institution Open Polar
collection University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia: COAST Research Database
op_collection_id ftunivscoast
language English
topic FoR 05 (Environmental Sciences)
FoR 16 (Studies in Human Society)
FoR 07 (Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences)
participatory scenario planning
Arctic
climate change
impacts
adaptation
vulnerability
spellingShingle FoR 05 (Environmental Sciences)
FoR 16 (Studies in Human Society)
FoR 07 (Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences)
participatory scenario planning
Arctic
climate change
impacts
adaptation
vulnerability
Flynn, Melanie
Ford, James D
Pearce, T
Harper, Sherilee L
IHACC Research Team
Participatory scenario planning and climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research in the Arctic
topic_facet FoR 05 (Environmental Sciences)
FoR 16 (Studies in Human Society)
FoR 07 (Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences)
participatory scenario planning
Arctic
climate change
impacts
adaptation
vulnerability
description Participatory scenario planning (PSP) approaches are increasingly being used in research on climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability (IAV). We identify and evaluate how PSP has been used in IAV studies in the Arctic, reviewing work published in the peer-reviewed and grey literature (n = 43). Studies utilizing PSP commonly follow the stages recognized as ‘best practice’ in the general literature in scenario planning, engaging with multiple ways of knowing including western science and traditional knowledge, and are employed in a diversity of sectors. Community participation, however, varies between studies, and climate projections are only utilized in just over half of the studies reviewed, raising concern that important future drivers of change are not fully captured. The time required to conduct PSP, involving extensive community engagement, was consistently reported as a challenge, and for application in Indigenous communities requires careful consideration of local culture, values, and belief systems on what it means to prepare for future climate impacts.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Flynn, Melanie
Ford, James D
Pearce, T
Harper, Sherilee L
IHACC Research Team
author_facet Flynn, Melanie
Ford, James D
Pearce, T
Harper, Sherilee L
IHACC Research Team
author_sort Flynn, Melanie
title Participatory scenario planning and climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research in the Arctic
title_short Participatory scenario planning and climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research in the Arctic
title_full Participatory scenario planning and climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research in the Arctic
title_fullStr Participatory scenario planning and climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research in the Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Participatory scenario planning and climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research in the Arctic
title_sort participatory scenario planning and climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research in the arctic
publisher Elsevier Inc.
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.012
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
op_relation usc:24452
URN:ISSN: 1462-9011
op_rights Copyright © 2017. Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.012
container_title Environmental Science & Policy
container_volume 79
container_start_page 45
op_container_end_page 53
_version_ 1766321965665091584