Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation

Introduction: In May 2020, a novel cryoballoon system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) became available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The design of the cryoballoon is comparable to the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro; Medtronic), but it is more compliant during freezing. We compare...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Main Authors: A. (Amira) Assaf, R.E. (Rohit) Bhagwandien, T. (Tamas) Szili Torok, S.C. (Sing) Yap
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repub.eur.nl/pub/136589
https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15182
id ftunivrotterdam:oai:repub.eur.nl:136589
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivrotterdam:oai:repub.eur.nl:136589 2024-06-02T08:02:43+00:00 Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation A. (Amira) Assaf R.E. (Rohit) Bhagwandien T. (Tamas) Szili Torok S.C. (Sing) Yap 2021-09-01 https://repub.eur.nl/pub/136589 https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15182 unknown https://repub.eur.nl/pub/136589 doi:10.1111/jce.15182 urn:hdl:1765/136589 Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology vol. 32 no. 9, pp. 2424-2431 info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2021 ftunivrotterdam https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15182 2024-05-06T17:04:38Z Introduction: In May 2020, a novel cryoballoon system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) became available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The design of the cryoballoon is comparable to the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro; Medtronic), but it is more compliant during freezing. We compared the procedural efficacy, biophysical parameters, and risk of phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) between the two cryoballoons. Methods: Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched until June 1, 2021 for relevant studies comparing POLARx versus AFA-Pro in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for AF. Results: A total of four studies, involving 310 patients were included. There was no difference between the two groups for outcomes regarding procedural efficacy: acute PVI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06 to 3.03; p =.40), procedure time (mean difference [MD]: 8.15 min; 95% CI: −8.09 to 24.39; p =.33), fluoroscopy time (MD: 1.32 min; 95% CI: −1.61 to 4.25; p =.38) and ablation time (MD: 1.00 min; 95% CI: −0.20 to 2.20; p =.10). The balloon nadir temperature was lower for all individual pulmonary veins (PV) in POLARx compared with AFA-Pro (MD: −9.74°C, −9.98°C, −6.72°C, −7.76°C, for left superior PV, left inferior PV, right superior PV, and right inferior PV, respectively; all p <.001). The incidence of PNP was similar between groups (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.85; p =.72). Conclusion: In AF patients undergoing PVI, POLARx and AFA-Pro had a similar procedural efficacy. Balloon nadir temperatures were lower with POLARx, however, the incidence of PNP was similar. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic RePub - Publications from Erasmus University, Rotterdam Arctic Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 32 9 2424 2431
institution Open Polar
collection RePub - Publications from Erasmus University, Rotterdam
op_collection_id ftunivrotterdam
language unknown
description Introduction: In May 2020, a novel cryoballoon system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) became available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The design of the cryoballoon is comparable to the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro; Medtronic), but it is more compliant during freezing. We compared the procedural efficacy, biophysical parameters, and risk of phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) between the two cryoballoons. Methods: Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched until June 1, 2021 for relevant studies comparing POLARx versus AFA-Pro in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for AF. Results: A total of four studies, involving 310 patients were included. There was no difference between the two groups for outcomes regarding procedural efficacy: acute PVI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06 to 3.03; p =.40), procedure time (mean difference [MD]: 8.15 min; 95% CI: −8.09 to 24.39; p =.33), fluoroscopy time (MD: 1.32 min; 95% CI: −1.61 to 4.25; p =.38) and ablation time (MD: 1.00 min; 95% CI: −0.20 to 2.20; p =.10). The balloon nadir temperature was lower for all individual pulmonary veins (PV) in POLARx compared with AFA-Pro (MD: −9.74°C, −9.98°C, −6.72°C, −7.76°C, for left superior PV, left inferior PV, right superior PV, and right inferior PV, respectively; all p <.001). The incidence of PNP was similar between groups (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.85; p =.72). Conclusion: In AF patients undergoing PVI, POLARx and AFA-Pro had a similar procedural efficacy. Balloon nadir temperatures were lower with POLARx, however, the incidence of PNP was similar.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author A. (Amira) Assaf
R.E. (Rohit) Bhagwandien
T. (Tamas) Szili Torok
S.C. (Sing) Yap
spellingShingle A. (Amira) Assaf
R.E. (Rohit) Bhagwandien
T. (Tamas) Szili Torok
S.C. (Sing) Yap
Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation
author_facet A. (Amira) Assaf
R.E. (Rohit) Bhagwandien
T. (Tamas) Szili Torok
S.C. (Sing) Yap
author_sort A. (Amira) Assaf
title Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation
title_short Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation
title_full Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation
title_fullStr Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation
title_sort comparison of procedural efficacy, balloon nadir temperature, and incidence of phrenic nerve palsy between two cryoballoon technologies for pulmonary vein isolation
publishDate 2021
url https://repub.eur.nl/pub/136589
https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15182
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology vol. 32 no. 9, pp. 2424-2431
op_relation https://repub.eur.nl/pub/136589
doi:10.1111/jce.15182
urn:hdl:1765/136589
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15182
container_title Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
container_volume 32
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2424
op_container_end_page 2431
_version_ 1800747202159575040