Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America

In Alberta, Canada (1982-2001), and in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, United States (19872001), wolves (Canis lupus) killed various domestic animals, among which the major prey were sheep in the United States (68%, n = 494) and cattle in Canada (95%; n = 1633). Under recovery programs, the wolf popula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Conservation Biology
Main Authors: Marco Musiani, Charles Mamo, Carolyn Callaghan, C. Cormack Gates, Livia Mattei, Elisabetta Visalberghi, Stewart Breck, Giulia Volpi, BOITANI, Luigi
Other Authors: Marco, Musiani, Charles, Mamo, Boitani, Luigi, Carolyn, Callaghan, C., Cormack Gate, Livia, Mattei, Elisabetta, Visalberghi, Stewart, Breck, Giulia, Volpi
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: WILEY-BLACKWELL 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11573/99554
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000186869700014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=0c7ff228ccbaaa74236f48834a34396a
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0347473814&partnerID=65&md5=316f4d62cead89bfd9d941997961c163
id ftunivromairis:oai:iris.uniroma1.it:11573/99554
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivromairis:oai:iris.uniroma1.it:11573/99554 2024-02-27T08:39:35+00:00 Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America Marco Musiani Charles Mamo Carolyn Callaghan C. Cormack Gates Livia Mattei Elisabetta Visalberghi Stewart Breck Giulia Volpi BOITANI, Luigi Marco, Musiani Charles, Mamo Boitani, Luigi Carolyn, Callaghan C., Cormack Gate Livia, Mattei Elisabetta, Visalberghi Stewart, Breck Giulia, Volpi 2003 http://hdl.handle.net/11573/99554 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000186869700014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=0c7ff228ccbaaa74236f48834a34396a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0347473814&partnerID=65&md5=316f4d62cead89bfd9d941997961c163 eng eng WILEY-BLACKWELL info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000186869700014 volume:17 issue:6 firstpage:1538 lastpage:1547 numberofpages:10 journal:CONSERVATION BIOLOGY http://hdl.handle.net/11573/99554 doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-0347473814 http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000186869700014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=0c7ff228ccbaaa74236f48834a34396a http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0347473814&partnerID=65&md5=316f4d62cead89bfd9d941997961c163 info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2003 ftunivromairis https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x 2024-01-31T17:51:12Z In Alberta, Canada (1982-2001), and in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, United States (19872001), wolves (Canis lupus) killed various domestic animals, among which the major prey were sheep in the United States (68%, n = 494) and cattle in Canada (95%; n = 1633). Under recovery programs, the wolf population increased in the United States, and depredation events increased proportionately. In both countries, the number of domestic animals killed each year was correlated with the number of wolves killed by government authorities for depredation management. We tested the ability of antiwolf barriers made of flags hanging from ropes to impede wolf access to food and livestock. In 18 experiments, barriers prevented captive wolves (n = 9) from accessing food for up to 28 hours and allowed daily separation of wolves to administer contraceptive pills to a female wolf. Barriers prevented access by wild wolves to 100-m(2) baited sites during two 60-day tests. We also set barriers around three cattle pastures. In Alberta during two 60-day trials on 25-ha pastures, wolves approached barriers on 23 occasions but did not cross them, and no cattle were killed. Wolves killed cattle on neighboring ranches during the trials and before and after the trials on the tested ranches. In Idaho four radio collared wolves crossed barriers and killed cattle in a 400-ha ranch after 61 days of barrier exposure. Our results suggest that antiwolf barriers are effective in deterring captive and wild wolves for >1 and 60 days, respectively, and that wild wolves switch to alternative livestock when excluded from one herd of livestock. Our depredation data indicate that protecting livestock from wolves reduces the necessity for killing wolves. Barriers could play a role among the limited set of preventive measures available and offer a cost-effective mitigation tool for the problem of livestock depredation on a local scale. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Sapienza Università di Roma: CINECA IRIS Canada Conservation Biology 17 6 1538 1547
institution Open Polar
collection Sapienza Università di Roma: CINECA IRIS
op_collection_id ftunivromairis
language English
description In Alberta, Canada (1982-2001), and in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, United States (19872001), wolves (Canis lupus) killed various domestic animals, among which the major prey were sheep in the United States (68%, n = 494) and cattle in Canada (95%; n = 1633). Under recovery programs, the wolf population increased in the United States, and depredation events increased proportionately. In both countries, the number of domestic animals killed each year was correlated with the number of wolves killed by government authorities for depredation management. We tested the ability of antiwolf barriers made of flags hanging from ropes to impede wolf access to food and livestock. In 18 experiments, barriers prevented captive wolves (n = 9) from accessing food for up to 28 hours and allowed daily separation of wolves to administer contraceptive pills to a female wolf. Barriers prevented access by wild wolves to 100-m(2) baited sites during two 60-day tests. We also set barriers around three cattle pastures. In Alberta during two 60-day trials on 25-ha pastures, wolves approached barriers on 23 occasions but did not cross them, and no cattle were killed. Wolves killed cattle on neighboring ranches during the trials and before and after the trials on the tested ranches. In Idaho four radio collared wolves crossed barriers and killed cattle in a 400-ha ranch after 61 days of barrier exposure. Our results suggest that antiwolf barriers are effective in deterring captive and wild wolves for >1 and 60 days, respectively, and that wild wolves switch to alternative livestock when excluded from one herd of livestock. Our depredation data indicate that protecting livestock from wolves reduces the necessity for killing wolves. Barriers could play a role among the limited set of preventive measures available and offer a cost-effective mitigation tool for the problem of livestock depredation on a local scale.
author2 Marco, Musiani
Charles, Mamo
Boitani, Luigi
Carolyn, Callaghan
C., Cormack Gate
Livia, Mattei
Elisabetta, Visalberghi
Stewart, Breck
Giulia, Volpi
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Marco Musiani
Charles Mamo
Carolyn Callaghan
C. Cormack Gates
Livia Mattei
Elisabetta Visalberghi
Stewart Breck
Giulia Volpi
BOITANI, Luigi
spellingShingle Marco Musiani
Charles Mamo
Carolyn Callaghan
C. Cormack Gates
Livia Mattei
Elisabetta Visalberghi
Stewart Breck
Giulia Volpi
BOITANI, Luigi
Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America
author_facet Marco Musiani
Charles Mamo
Carolyn Callaghan
C. Cormack Gates
Livia Mattei
Elisabetta Visalberghi
Stewart Breck
Giulia Volpi
BOITANI, Luigi
author_sort Marco Musiani
title Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America
title_short Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America
title_full Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America
title_fullStr Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America
title_full_unstemmed Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America
title_sort wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western north america
publisher WILEY-BLACKWELL
publishDate 2003
url http://hdl.handle.net/11573/99554
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000186869700014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=0c7ff228ccbaaa74236f48834a34396a
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0347473814&partnerID=65&md5=316f4d62cead89bfd9d941997961c163
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000186869700014
volume:17
issue:6
firstpage:1538
lastpage:1547
numberofpages:10
journal:CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
http://hdl.handle.net/11573/99554
doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-0347473814
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000186869700014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=0c7ff228ccbaaa74236f48834a34396a
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0347473814&partnerID=65&md5=316f4d62cead89bfd9d941997961c163
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x
container_title Conservation Biology
container_volume 17
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1538
op_container_end_page 1547
_version_ 1792046612418134016