Treaty Interpretation: The Judicial Function between the Appreciation of States Parties and of Institutional Bodies
The dispute between Australia and Japan concerning the whaling in the Antarctic raised a number of issues of treaty interpretation. The article focuses in particular on the role that the unilateral position taken by the different actors involved in the conclusion or the implementation of a treaty ca...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11573/584786 |
_version_ | 1830569457190174720 |
---|---|
author | BONAFE', BEATRICE ILARIA |
author2 | Bonafe', BEATRICE ILARIA |
author_facet | BONAFE', BEATRICE ILARIA |
author_sort | BONAFE', BEATRICE ILARIA |
collection | Sapienza Università di Roma: CINECA IRIS |
description | The dispute between Australia and Japan concerning the whaling in the Antarctic raised a number of issues of treaty interpretation. The article focuses in particular on the role that the unilateral position taken by the different actors involved in the conclusion or the implementation of a treaty can play in the interpretation of its provisions. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Antarc* Antarctic |
genre_facet | Antarc* Antarctic |
geographic | Antarctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet | Antarctic The Antarctic |
id | ftunivromairis:oai:iris.uniroma1.it:11573/584786 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftunivromairis |
op_relation | firstpage:535 lastpage:540 numberofpages:6 journal:ORDINE INTERNAZIONALE E DIRITTI UMANI http://hdl.handle.net/11573/584786 www.rivistaoidu.net |
op_rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftunivromairis:oai:iris.uniroma1.it:11573/584786 2025-04-27T14:17:15+00:00 Treaty Interpretation: The Judicial Function between the Appreciation of States Parties and of Institutional Bodies BONAFE', BEATRICE ILARIA Bonafe', BEATRICE ILARIA 2014 ELETTRONICO http://hdl.handle.net/11573/584786 eng eng firstpage:535 lastpage:540 numberofpages:6 journal:ORDINE INTERNAZIONALE E DIRITTI UMANI http://hdl.handle.net/11573/584786 www.rivistaoidu.net info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess international court of justice treaty interpretation intention of the partie subsequent practice info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2014 ftunivromairis 2025-04-03T15:58:26Z The dispute between Australia and Japan concerning the whaling in the Antarctic raised a number of issues of treaty interpretation. The article focuses in particular on the role that the unilateral position taken by the different actors involved in the conclusion or the implementation of a treaty can play in the interpretation of its provisions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Sapienza Università di Roma: CINECA IRIS Antarctic The Antarctic |
spellingShingle | international court of justice treaty interpretation intention of the partie subsequent practice BONAFE', BEATRICE ILARIA Treaty Interpretation: The Judicial Function between the Appreciation of States Parties and of Institutional Bodies |
title | Treaty Interpretation: The Judicial Function between the Appreciation of States Parties and of Institutional Bodies |
title_full | Treaty Interpretation: The Judicial Function between the Appreciation of States Parties and of Institutional Bodies |
title_fullStr | Treaty Interpretation: The Judicial Function between the Appreciation of States Parties and of Institutional Bodies |
title_full_unstemmed | Treaty Interpretation: The Judicial Function between the Appreciation of States Parties and of Institutional Bodies |
title_short | Treaty Interpretation: The Judicial Function between the Appreciation of States Parties and of Institutional Bodies |
title_sort | treaty interpretation: the judicial function between the appreciation of states parties and of institutional bodies |
topic | international court of justice treaty interpretation intention of the partie subsequent practice |
topic_facet | international court of justice treaty interpretation intention of the partie subsequent practice |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/11573/584786 |