Spatio‐temporal variation in post‐recovery dynamics in a large Peregrine Falcon ( Falco peregrinus ) population in the Jura mountains 2000–2020

• Published in: Ibis
• Main Authors: Kéry, Marc, Banderet, Gabriel, Müller, Claudia, Pinaud, David, Savioz, Jérémy, Schmid, Hans, Werner, Stefan, Monneret, René‐jean
• Other Authors: Swiss Ornithological Institute, Route de la Cure 27, 1470 Lully, Switzerland, Centre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé - UMR 7372 (CEBC), La Rochelle Université (ULR)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Moulin du Haut, 39470 Arlay, Jura, France
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: HAL CCSD 2022
• Subjects: colonization rate; extinction rate; JAGS; occupancy model; persistence rate; pesticide victim; preferential sampling; population trend; [SDE]Environmental Sciences; Jura; Falco peregrinus; peregrine falcon
• Online Access: https://hal.science/hal-03295879; https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12999

International audience After spectacular population crashes in the 1960-70s, Peregrine Falcons Falco peregrinus recovered worldwide, and in the 2000s many study populations were back to normal. However, post-recovery trends have not been documented. We combined three long-term population studies covering the entire Jura mountains (16,304 km²) to examine spatio-temporal variation in population dynamics during 2000–2020 in 420 known nesting sites in five regions: Ain, Jura and Doubs in France, and Jura Sud and Jura Nord in Switzerland. Every year about 60% of all sites were surveyed at least once, and this proportion increased over time. We used Bayesian occupancy modeling to investigate site persistence and colonization probabilities and correct status and trend estimates for bias due to nonrandom site coverage. Based on the average of two models correcting for preferential sampling, we estimated that population size peaked in 2002 (Jura), 2005 (Doubs), 2007 (Ain, Jura Nord) and in 2007 for the Jura as a whole. Thereafter, the population declined significantly in four regions and in the Jura as a whole, with the strongest decline found in the Jura Nord ( –38%, CRI –34%/–41%) during 2007–2020. Thus, we found considerable spatial heterogeneity in post-recovery trends and widespread post-recovery declines. Reasons for the latter may include eagle owl predation, illegal persecution, and human disturbance. Our results illustrate how quickly positive population trends may be reversed, such that continuous long-term monitoring even for species seemingly "out of danger" remains invaluable. Our study also emphasizes the importance of correcting for both coverage bias in general and for preferential sampling in particular when assessing population trends in studies where not every territory can be surveyed in all years.