Linking Protistan Herbivory to Environmental and Biotic Controls
Phagotrophic protists have been established as the major consumers of ocean primary production and as such occupy a pivotal position in pelagic food webs, yet knowledge gaps remain regarding the seasonal and spatial variability of protistan grazing, and of its drivers, both environmental and biotic....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | unknown |
| Published: |
DigitalCommons@URI
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/528 https://doi.org/10.23860/diss-morison-franoise-2016 https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/context/oa_diss/article/1541/viewcontent/Morison_uri_0186A_11589.pdf |
| Summary: | Phagotrophic protists have been established as the major consumers of ocean primary production and as such occupy a pivotal position in pelagic food webs, yet knowledge gaps remain regarding the seasonal and spatial variability of protistan grazing, and of its drivers, both environmental and biotic. The aim of the present research was to address such gaps. To do so, I gathered field measurements and observations and evaluated modifications and alternatives to current methods used to estimate grazing rates and characterize plankton communities. In a study conducted in the Western Antarctic Peninsula aimed at quantifying the seasonal variability of protistan herbivory (Chapter 2), the magnitude of grazing rates measured during austral fall 2013 and austral spring 2014 did not vary with prey biomass. Despite contrasting levels of phytoplankton biomass assessed by chlorophyll a measurements (< 0.4 μg L-1 in the fall, up to 18.5 μg L-1 in the spring), grazing rates measured during austral fall (0-0.26 d-1) were as high or higher than rates measured during austral spring (0-0.1 d-1), and approximately half of the experiments in both seasons yielded no measurable grazing. Overall low grazing rates could not be explained by a lack of predators. Small cells dominated the austral fall phytoplankton community, and during austral spring, grazing was detected when the prey size-structure resembled fall conditions most, suggesting an association between detectable grazing and the dominance of small cells. These results indicate a lack of predators’ functional response in the WAP, which is contrary to the assumption made when describing zooplankton grazing in models. Instead, plankton population dynamics and ultimately phytoplankton biomass accumulation rates in the WAP region may be best predicted as a function of plankton community composition, emphasizing the importance of characterizing these communities concurrently while measuring rates of protistan herbivory. Results also underline the need to extend measurements for ... |
|---|