Ecological implications of reduced forage quality on growth and survival of sympatric geese

Summary: Allometric constraints associated with digesting leaves require relatively small avian herbivores to consume high-quality forage. How such constraints are overcome during ontogeny when energy and nutrient requirements are relatively high has not been adequately explored. We compared growth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Animal Ecology
Main Authors: Richman, Samantha E., Leafloor, James O., Karasov, William H., Mcwilliams, Scott R.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: DigitalCommons@URI 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/546
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12270
id ftunivrhodeislan:oai:digitalcommons.uri.edu:nrs_facpubs-1547
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivrhodeislan:oai:digitalcommons.uri.edu:nrs_facpubs-1547 2023-07-30T03:55:34+02:00 Ecological implications of reduced forage quality on growth and survival of sympatric geese Richman, Samantha E. Leafloor, James O. Karasov, William H. Mcwilliams, Scott R. 2015-01-01T08:00:00Z https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/546 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12270 unknown DigitalCommons@URI https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/546 doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12270 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12270 Natural Resources Science Faculty Publications Arctic geese Branta canadensis Canada goose Chen caerulescens Forage quality Growth Lesser snow goose Logistic growth curve Survival text 2015 ftunivrhodeislan https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12270 2023-07-17T19:09:48Z Summary: Allometric constraints associated with digesting leaves require relatively small avian herbivores to consume high-quality forage. How such constraints are overcome during ontogeny when energy and nutrient requirements are relatively high has not been adequately explored. We compared growth trajectories of Canada and lesser snow goose goslings raised on grass-based diets that differed in protein (10%, 14% or 18%) and fibre (30% or 45%) with those of free-living goslings on Akimiski Island, Canada. This common-garden experiment allowed us to test the hypotheses that (i) smaller-bodied geese are more negatively affected by reduced forage quality than larger-bodied geese, and (ii) goslings from subarctic brood-rearing areas have a limited capacity to slow growth in response to reduced forage quality. Canada goose goslings fed low-protein (10%) diets were on average 44% lighter in body mass, had slower growth rates and were delayed >20 days in reaching 90% of asymptotic size compared with Canada goose goslings fed 18% protein. In contrast, snow goose goslings were unable to survive on the low-protein diets, and those fed high- or medium-protein diets grew at a similar rate and achieved similar asymptotic size. Canada and snow goose goslings fed low-protein diets had reduced growth rates of the tarsus and delayed emergence of the 9th primary. Free-ranging Canada goslings on Akimiski Island were similar in mass and structural size to captive-reared goslings fed low-protein diets. In contrast, snow goslings were similar in mass and structural size to the captive-reared goslings fed the high- and medium-protein diets. This suggests that degraded habitats with mostly low-protein forage may be able to support Canada goslings better than snow goslings which require higher-quality forage to survive. Size-related differences in gosling growth and survival in response to diminished diet quality may influence population size when available food reaches a lower threshold in protein content. However, goslings can ... Text Akimiski island Arctic Branta canadensis Canada Goose Subarctic University of Rhode Island: DigitalCommons@URI Akimiski Island ENVELOPE(-81.275,-81.275,53.008,53.008) Arctic Canada Journal of Animal Ecology 84 1 284 298
institution Open Polar
collection University of Rhode Island: DigitalCommons@URI
op_collection_id ftunivrhodeislan
language unknown
topic Arctic geese
Branta canadensis
Canada goose
Chen caerulescens
Forage quality
Growth
Lesser snow goose
Logistic growth curve
Survival
spellingShingle Arctic geese
Branta canadensis
Canada goose
Chen caerulescens
Forage quality
Growth
Lesser snow goose
Logistic growth curve
Survival
Richman, Samantha E.
Leafloor, James O.
Karasov, William H.
Mcwilliams, Scott R.
Ecological implications of reduced forage quality on growth and survival of sympatric geese
topic_facet Arctic geese
Branta canadensis
Canada goose
Chen caerulescens
Forage quality
Growth
Lesser snow goose
Logistic growth curve
Survival
description Summary: Allometric constraints associated with digesting leaves require relatively small avian herbivores to consume high-quality forage. How such constraints are overcome during ontogeny when energy and nutrient requirements are relatively high has not been adequately explored. We compared growth trajectories of Canada and lesser snow goose goslings raised on grass-based diets that differed in protein (10%, 14% or 18%) and fibre (30% or 45%) with those of free-living goslings on Akimiski Island, Canada. This common-garden experiment allowed us to test the hypotheses that (i) smaller-bodied geese are more negatively affected by reduced forage quality than larger-bodied geese, and (ii) goslings from subarctic brood-rearing areas have a limited capacity to slow growth in response to reduced forage quality. Canada goose goslings fed low-protein (10%) diets were on average 44% lighter in body mass, had slower growth rates and were delayed >20 days in reaching 90% of asymptotic size compared with Canada goose goslings fed 18% protein. In contrast, snow goose goslings were unable to survive on the low-protein diets, and those fed high- or medium-protein diets grew at a similar rate and achieved similar asymptotic size. Canada and snow goose goslings fed low-protein diets had reduced growth rates of the tarsus and delayed emergence of the 9th primary. Free-ranging Canada goslings on Akimiski Island were similar in mass and structural size to captive-reared goslings fed low-protein diets. In contrast, snow goslings were similar in mass and structural size to the captive-reared goslings fed the high- and medium-protein diets. This suggests that degraded habitats with mostly low-protein forage may be able to support Canada goslings better than snow goslings which require higher-quality forage to survive. Size-related differences in gosling growth and survival in response to diminished diet quality may influence population size when available food reaches a lower threshold in protein content. However, goslings can ...
format Text
author Richman, Samantha E.
Leafloor, James O.
Karasov, William H.
Mcwilliams, Scott R.
author_facet Richman, Samantha E.
Leafloor, James O.
Karasov, William H.
Mcwilliams, Scott R.
author_sort Richman, Samantha E.
title Ecological implications of reduced forage quality on growth and survival of sympatric geese
title_short Ecological implications of reduced forage quality on growth and survival of sympatric geese
title_full Ecological implications of reduced forage quality on growth and survival of sympatric geese
title_fullStr Ecological implications of reduced forage quality on growth and survival of sympatric geese
title_full_unstemmed Ecological implications of reduced forage quality on growth and survival of sympatric geese
title_sort ecological implications of reduced forage quality on growth and survival of sympatric geese
publisher DigitalCommons@URI
publishDate 2015
url https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/546
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12270
long_lat ENVELOPE(-81.275,-81.275,53.008,53.008)
geographic Akimiski Island
Arctic
Canada
geographic_facet Akimiski Island
Arctic
Canada
genre Akimiski island
Arctic
Branta canadensis
Canada Goose
Subarctic
genre_facet Akimiski island
Arctic
Branta canadensis
Canada Goose
Subarctic
op_source Natural Resources Science Faculty Publications
op_relation https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/546
doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12270
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12270
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12270
container_title Journal of Animal Ecology
container_volume 84
container_issue 1
container_start_page 284
op_container_end_page 298
_version_ 1772818573128892416