Power Pole Density and Avian Electrocution Risk in the Western United States

Avian electrocutions on power poles affect raptor populations globally. Mitigation strategies in the USA are typically bottom-up, combining risk assessments for individual poles into a utility-specific avian protection plan. This approach is usually reactive, relying on incidental documentation of e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Raptor Research
Main Authors: Dwyer, James F., Gerber, Brian D., Petersen, Paul, Armstrong, William E., Harness, Richard E.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: DigitalCommons@URI 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/374
https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.93
id ftunivrhodeislan:oai:digitalcommons.uri.edu:nrs_facpubs-1375
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivrhodeislan:oai:digitalcommons.uri.edu:nrs_facpubs-1375 2023-07-30T04:07:30+02:00 Power Pole Density and Avian Electrocution Risk in the Western United States Dwyer, James F. Gerber, Brian D. Petersen, Paul Armstrong, William E. Harness, Richard E. 2020-05-01T07:00:00Z https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/374 https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.93 unknown DigitalCommons@URI https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/374 doi:10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.93 https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.93 Natural Resources Science Faculty Publications Aquila chrysaetos electric utility Golden Eagle model random forest raptor text 2020 ftunivrhodeislan https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.93 2023-07-17T19:09:08Z Avian electrocutions on power poles affect raptor populations globally. Mitigation strategies in the USA are typically bottom-up, combining risk assessments for individual poles into a utility-specific avian protection plan. This approach is usually reactive, relying on incidental documentation of electrocutions for initiation, and can allow uncoordinated mitigation strategies among adjacent utilities. A top-down strategy may help solve both problems if maps identifying where distribution power poles occur were available for comparison to range maps for species at risk of electrocution. Range maps exist but pole location data are rarely publicly available in the USA. Pole-density models were previously created for Colorado and Wyoming, the Great Basin, and the Columbia Plateau because pole density can serve as a surrogate for electrocution risk. We used each of these models to predict pole densities throughout four additional areas: the Northwestern Plains, Southwestern Plains, Southwestern Plateaus, and parts of New Mexico not included in other modeled areas. We also applied the Colorado and Wyoming model to portions of the Uinta Basin and Wyoming Basin projecting from Colorado and Wyoming into Idaho and Utah. The Colorado and Wyoming model fit all areas better than other models, except parts of New Mexico not included in other modeled areas, where the Great Basin model fit best. Our model predictions facilitate assessment of pole density across much (2,573,746 km2) of the western USA. To assess whether the models are useful in predicting electrocutions, we compared predicted pole densities throughout White Sands Missile Range to locations of 59 avian electrocutions. Electrocutions occurred at low rates in cells with low predicted pole densities, and at higher rates in cells with moderate and high predicted pole densities. Because the models do not include species-specific information, they have the potential to be applicable to the conservation of a wide variety of species. Text Aquila chrysaetos golden eagle University of Rhode Island: DigitalCommons@URI Journal of Raptor Research 54 2 93
institution Open Polar
collection University of Rhode Island: DigitalCommons@URI
op_collection_id ftunivrhodeislan
language unknown
topic Aquila chrysaetos
electric utility
Golden Eagle
model
random forest
raptor
spellingShingle Aquila chrysaetos
electric utility
Golden Eagle
model
random forest
raptor
Dwyer, James F.
Gerber, Brian D.
Petersen, Paul
Armstrong, William E.
Harness, Richard E.
Power Pole Density and Avian Electrocution Risk in the Western United States
topic_facet Aquila chrysaetos
electric utility
Golden Eagle
model
random forest
raptor
description Avian electrocutions on power poles affect raptor populations globally. Mitigation strategies in the USA are typically bottom-up, combining risk assessments for individual poles into a utility-specific avian protection plan. This approach is usually reactive, relying on incidental documentation of electrocutions for initiation, and can allow uncoordinated mitigation strategies among adjacent utilities. A top-down strategy may help solve both problems if maps identifying where distribution power poles occur were available for comparison to range maps for species at risk of electrocution. Range maps exist but pole location data are rarely publicly available in the USA. Pole-density models were previously created for Colorado and Wyoming, the Great Basin, and the Columbia Plateau because pole density can serve as a surrogate for electrocution risk. We used each of these models to predict pole densities throughout four additional areas: the Northwestern Plains, Southwestern Plains, Southwestern Plateaus, and parts of New Mexico not included in other modeled areas. We also applied the Colorado and Wyoming model to portions of the Uinta Basin and Wyoming Basin projecting from Colorado and Wyoming into Idaho and Utah. The Colorado and Wyoming model fit all areas better than other models, except parts of New Mexico not included in other modeled areas, where the Great Basin model fit best. Our model predictions facilitate assessment of pole density across much (2,573,746 km2) of the western USA. To assess whether the models are useful in predicting electrocutions, we compared predicted pole densities throughout White Sands Missile Range to locations of 59 avian electrocutions. Electrocutions occurred at low rates in cells with low predicted pole densities, and at higher rates in cells with moderate and high predicted pole densities. Because the models do not include species-specific information, they have the potential to be applicable to the conservation of a wide variety of species.
format Text
author Dwyer, James F.
Gerber, Brian D.
Petersen, Paul
Armstrong, William E.
Harness, Richard E.
author_facet Dwyer, James F.
Gerber, Brian D.
Petersen, Paul
Armstrong, William E.
Harness, Richard E.
author_sort Dwyer, James F.
title Power Pole Density and Avian Electrocution Risk in the Western United States
title_short Power Pole Density and Avian Electrocution Risk in the Western United States
title_full Power Pole Density and Avian Electrocution Risk in the Western United States
title_fullStr Power Pole Density and Avian Electrocution Risk in the Western United States
title_full_unstemmed Power Pole Density and Avian Electrocution Risk in the Western United States
title_sort power pole density and avian electrocution risk in the western united states
publisher DigitalCommons@URI
publishDate 2020
url https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/374
https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.93
genre Aquila chrysaetos
golden eagle
genre_facet Aquila chrysaetos
golden eagle
op_source Natural Resources Science Faculty Publications
op_relation https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/nrs_facpubs/374
doi:10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.93
https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.93
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016-54.2.93
container_title Journal of Raptor Research
container_volume 54
container_issue 2
container_start_page 93
_version_ 1772820897807204352