The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture
Domestic aquaculture continues to meet public resistance in the U.S. even though the U.S. imports a growing amount of farmed seafood. This study applies the normative evaluation approach to aquaculture in the South Puget Sound, Washington and uses data from an online survey to evaluate how local res...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
DigitalCommons@URI
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI13811954 |
id |
ftunivrhodeislan:oai:digitalcommons.uri.edu:dissertations-4266 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivrhodeislan:oai:digitalcommons.uri.edu:dissertations-4266 2023-05-15T15:32:35+02:00 The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture Rubstello, Katie 2019-01-01T08:00:00Z https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI13811954 ENG eng DigitalCommons@URI https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI13811954 Dissertations and Master's Theses (Campus Access) Environmental management text 2019 ftunivrhodeislan 2021-06-29T19:18:29Z Domestic aquaculture continues to meet public resistance in the U.S. even though the U.S. imports a growing amount of farmed seafood. This study applies the normative evaluation approach to aquaculture in the South Puget Sound, Washington and uses data from an online survey to evaluate how local residents feel about two different types of shellfish aquaculture methods (rafts; bottom culture) in natural and developed settings. This study also evaluates public perceptions of the social and environmental impacts of shellfish aquaculture and examines how a farmed Atlantic salmon escape in Puget Sound in 2017 affected participant views of aquaculture. Findings revealed that Washington residents are overall accepting of both raft and bottom culture shellfish farms in natural and developed settings but are more supportive overall of bottom culture. Support for aquaculture depends on a moderation of farming intensity, as residents were more accepting of low to medium levels of raft and bottom culture. Respondents also felt that shellfish aquaculture had positive and negative impacts on local communities and the environment. They overwhelmingly agreed that aquaculture is good for the economy and a good nutritional option but had concerns about public access, use conflict, and local environmental disruption. These exploratory results can inform Washington aquaculture managers on how to engage the public with the impacts, risks, and methods of shellfish farms for better industry and community relations as shellfish aquaculture continues to grow in Washington coastal waters. Text Atlantic salmon University of Rhode Island: DigitalCommons@URI |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Rhode Island: DigitalCommons@URI |
op_collection_id |
ftunivrhodeislan |
language |
English |
topic |
Environmental management |
spellingShingle |
Environmental management Rubstello, Katie The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture |
topic_facet |
Environmental management |
description |
Domestic aquaculture continues to meet public resistance in the U.S. even though the U.S. imports a growing amount of farmed seafood. This study applies the normative evaluation approach to aquaculture in the South Puget Sound, Washington and uses data from an online survey to evaluate how local residents feel about two different types of shellfish aquaculture methods (rafts; bottom culture) in natural and developed settings. This study also evaluates public perceptions of the social and environmental impacts of shellfish aquaculture and examines how a farmed Atlantic salmon escape in Puget Sound in 2017 affected participant views of aquaculture. Findings revealed that Washington residents are overall accepting of both raft and bottom culture shellfish farms in natural and developed settings but are more supportive overall of bottom culture. Support for aquaculture depends on a moderation of farming intensity, as residents were more accepting of low to medium levels of raft and bottom culture. Respondents also felt that shellfish aquaculture had positive and negative impacts on local communities and the environment. They overwhelmingly agreed that aquaculture is good for the economy and a good nutritional option but had concerns about public access, use conflict, and local environmental disruption. These exploratory results can inform Washington aquaculture managers on how to engage the public with the impacts, risks, and methods of shellfish farms for better industry and community relations as shellfish aquaculture continues to grow in Washington coastal waters. |
format |
Text |
author |
Rubstello, Katie |
author_facet |
Rubstello, Katie |
author_sort |
Rubstello, Katie |
title |
The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture |
title_short |
The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture |
title_full |
The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture |
title_fullStr |
The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture |
title_sort |
social acceptability of shellfish aquaculture |
publisher |
DigitalCommons@URI |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI13811954 |
genre |
Atlantic salmon |
genre_facet |
Atlantic salmon |
op_source |
Dissertations and Master's Theses (Campus Access) |
op_relation |
https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI13811954 |
_version_ |
1766363083797692416 |