The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture

Domestic aquaculture continues to meet public resistance in the U.S. even though the U.S. imports a growing amount of farmed seafood. This study applies the normative evaluation approach to aquaculture in the South Puget Sound, Washington and uses data from an online survey to evaluate how local res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rubstello, Katie
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: DigitalCommons@URI 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI13811954
id ftunivrhodeislan:oai:digitalcommons.uri.edu:dissertations-4266
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivrhodeislan:oai:digitalcommons.uri.edu:dissertations-4266 2023-05-15T15:32:35+02:00 The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture Rubstello, Katie 2019-01-01T08:00:00Z https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI13811954 ENG eng DigitalCommons@URI https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI13811954 Dissertations and Master's Theses (Campus Access) Environmental management text 2019 ftunivrhodeislan 2021-06-29T19:18:29Z Domestic aquaculture continues to meet public resistance in the U.S. even though the U.S. imports a growing amount of farmed seafood. This study applies the normative evaluation approach to aquaculture in the South Puget Sound, Washington and uses data from an online survey to evaluate how local residents feel about two different types of shellfish aquaculture methods (rafts; bottom culture) in natural and developed settings. This study also evaluates public perceptions of the social and environmental impacts of shellfish aquaculture and examines how a farmed Atlantic salmon escape in Puget Sound in 2017 affected participant views of aquaculture. Findings revealed that Washington residents are overall accepting of both raft and bottom culture shellfish farms in natural and developed settings but are more supportive overall of bottom culture. Support for aquaculture depends on a moderation of farming intensity, as residents were more accepting of low to medium levels of raft and bottom culture. Respondents also felt that shellfish aquaculture had positive and negative impacts on local communities and the environment. They overwhelmingly agreed that aquaculture is good for the economy and a good nutritional option but had concerns about public access, use conflict, and local environmental disruption. These exploratory results can inform Washington aquaculture managers on how to engage the public with the impacts, risks, and methods of shellfish farms for better industry and community relations as shellfish aquaculture continues to grow in Washington coastal waters. Text Atlantic salmon University of Rhode Island: DigitalCommons@URI
institution Open Polar
collection University of Rhode Island: DigitalCommons@URI
op_collection_id ftunivrhodeislan
language English
topic Environmental management
spellingShingle Environmental management
Rubstello, Katie
The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture
topic_facet Environmental management
description Domestic aquaculture continues to meet public resistance in the U.S. even though the U.S. imports a growing amount of farmed seafood. This study applies the normative evaluation approach to aquaculture in the South Puget Sound, Washington and uses data from an online survey to evaluate how local residents feel about two different types of shellfish aquaculture methods (rafts; bottom culture) in natural and developed settings. This study also evaluates public perceptions of the social and environmental impacts of shellfish aquaculture and examines how a farmed Atlantic salmon escape in Puget Sound in 2017 affected participant views of aquaculture. Findings revealed that Washington residents are overall accepting of both raft and bottom culture shellfish farms in natural and developed settings but are more supportive overall of bottom culture. Support for aquaculture depends on a moderation of farming intensity, as residents were more accepting of low to medium levels of raft and bottom culture. Respondents also felt that shellfish aquaculture had positive and negative impacts on local communities and the environment. They overwhelmingly agreed that aquaculture is good for the economy and a good nutritional option but had concerns about public access, use conflict, and local environmental disruption. These exploratory results can inform Washington aquaculture managers on how to engage the public with the impacts, risks, and methods of shellfish farms for better industry and community relations as shellfish aquaculture continues to grow in Washington coastal waters.
format Text
author Rubstello, Katie
author_facet Rubstello, Katie
author_sort Rubstello, Katie
title The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture
title_short The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture
title_full The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture
title_fullStr The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture
title_full_unstemmed The Social Acceptability of Shellfish Aquaculture
title_sort social acceptability of shellfish aquaculture
publisher DigitalCommons@URI
publishDate 2019
url https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI13811954
genre Atlantic salmon
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
op_source Dissertations and Master's Theses (Campus Access)
op_relation https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dissertations/AAI13811954
_version_ 1766363083797692416