An intercomparison of skill and overconfidence/underconfidence of the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation in multimodel seasonal forecasts

• Published in: Geophysical Research Letters
• Main Authors: Baker, L. H., Shaffrey, L. C., Sutton, R. T., Weisheimer, A., Scaife, A. A.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: American Geophysical Union 2018
• Subjects: North Atlantic; North Atlantic oscillation
• Online Access: https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/78200/; https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/78200/8/Baker_et_al-2018-Geophysical_Research_Letters.pdf; https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/78200/1/grl_bakeretal_accepted_vn.pdf

Recent studies of individual seasonal forecast systems have shown that the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) can be skillfully forecast. However, it has also been suggested that these skillful forecasts tend to be underconfident, meaning that there is too high a proportion of unpredictable noise in the forecasts. We assess the skill and overconfidence/underconfidence of the seasonal forecast systems contributing to the EUROpean Seasonal to Interannual Prediction (EUROSIP) multimodel ensemble system. Five of the seven systems studied have significant skill for forecasting the wintertime NAO at 2‐ to 4‐month lead times. Four of these skillful systems are underconfident for forecasting the NAO. A multimodel ensemble (ensemble size 126 members) is both skillful and clearly underconfident. Underconfidence becomes more pronounced as the ensemble size increases. Certain years in the hindcast period are well forecast by all or most models. This implies that common teleconnections and drivers of the NAO are being captured by the EUROSIP seasonal forecasts.