A simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - Part II: Labrador Sea stability and stochastic forcing?

Aspects of open ocean deep convection variability are explored with a two-box model. In order to place the model in a region of parameter space relevant to the real ocean, it is fitted to observational data from the Labrador Sea. A systematic fit to OWS Bravo data allows us to determine the model pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kuhlbrodt, Till, Titz, Sven, Feudel, Ulrike, Rahmstorf, Stefan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Springer Verlag 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/111687/
id ftunivreading:oai:centaur.reading.ac.uk:111687
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivreading:oai:centaur.reading.ac.uk:111687 2024-06-23T07:54:26+00:00 A simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - Part II: Labrador Sea stability and stochastic forcing? Kuhlbrodt, Till Titz, Sven Feudel, Ulrike Rahmstorf, Stefan 2001-10 https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/111687/ unknown Springer Verlag Kuhlbrodt, T. <https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/view/creators/90000754.html> orcid:0000-0003-2328-6729 , Titz, S., Feudel, U. and Rahmstorf, S. (2001) A simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - Part II: Labrador Sea stability and stochastic forcing? Ocean Dynamics, 52. pp. 36-49. ISSN 1616-7341 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-001-8175-3 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-001-8175-3> Article PeerReviewed 2001 ftunivreading 2024-06-11T15:12:32Z Aspects of open ocean deep convection variability are explored with a two-box model. In order to place the model in a region of parameter space relevant to the real ocean, it is fitted to observational data from the Labrador Sea. A systematic fit to OWS Bravo data allows us to determine the model parameters and to locate the position of the Labrador Sea on a stability diagram. The model suggests that the Labrador Sea is in a bistable regime where winter convection can be either "on" or "off", with both these possibilities being stable climate states. When shifting the surface buoyancy forcing slightly to warmer or fresher conditions, the only steady solution is one without winter convection. We then introduce short-term variability by adding a noise term to the surface temperature forcing, turning the box model into a stochastic climate model. The surface forcing anomalies generated in this way induce jumps between the two model states. These state transitions occur on the interannual to decadal time scale. Changing the average surface forcing towards more buoyant conditions lowers the frequency of convection. However, convection becomes more frequent with stronger variability in the surface forcing. As part of the natural variability, there is a non-negligible probability for decadal interruptions of convection. The results highlight the role of surface forcing variability for the persistence of convection in the ocean. Article in Journal/Newspaper Labrador Sea CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading
institution Open Polar
collection CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading
op_collection_id ftunivreading
language unknown
description Aspects of open ocean deep convection variability are explored with a two-box model. In order to place the model in a region of parameter space relevant to the real ocean, it is fitted to observational data from the Labrador Sea. A systematic fit to OWS Bravo data allows us to determine the model parameters and to locate the position of the Labrador Sea on a stability diagram. The model suggests that the Labrador Sea is in a bistable regime where winter convection can be either "on" or "off", with both these possibilities being stable climate states. When shifting the surface buoyancy forcing slightly to warmer or fresher conditions, the only steady solution is one without winter convection. We then introduce short-term variability by adding a noise term to the surface temperature forcing, turning the box model into a stochastic climate model. The surface forcing anomalies generated in this way induce jumps between the two model states. These state transitions occur on the interannual to decadal time scale. Changing the average surface forcing towards more buoyant conditions lowers the frequency of convection. However, convection becomes more frequent with stronger variability in the surface forcing. As part of the natural variability, there is a non-negligible probability for decadal interruptions of convection. The results highlight the role of surface forcing variability for the persistence of convection in the ocean.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kuhlbrodt, Till
Titz, Sven
Feudel, Ulrike
Rahmstorf, Stefan
spellingShingle Kuhlbrodt, Till
Titz, Sven
Feudel, Ulrike
Rahmstorf, Stefan
A simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - Part II: Labrador Sea stability and stochastic forcing?
author_facet Kuhlbrodt, Till
Titz, Sven
Feudel, Ulrike
Rahmstorf, Stefan
author_sort Kuhlbrodt, Till
title A simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - Part II: Labrador Sea stability and stochastic forcing?
title_short A simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - Part II: Labrador Sea stability and stochastic forcing?
title_full A simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - Part II: Labrador Sea stability and stochastic forcing?
title_fullStr A simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - Part II: Labrador Sea stability and stochastic forcing?
title_full_unstemmed A simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - Part II: Labrador Sea stability and stochastic forcing?
title_sort simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - part ii: labrador sea stability and stochastic forcing?
publisher Springer Verlag
publishDate 2001
url https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/111687/
genre Labrador Sea
genre_facet Labrador Sea
op_relation Kuhlbrodt, T. <https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/view/creators/90000754.html> orcid:0000-0003-2328-6729 , Titz, S., Feudel, U. and Rahmstorf, S. (2001) A simple model of seasonal open ocean convection - Part II: Labrador Sea stability and stochastic forcing? Ocean Dynamics, 52. pp. 36-49. ISSN 1616-7341 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-001-8175-3 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-001-8175-3>
_version_ 1802646583438737408