Identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of North Atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble NWP re-forecasts
Downward counterfactual analysis – or quantitatively estimating how our observed history could have been worse – is increasingly being used by the re/insurance industry to identify, quantify, and mitigate against as-yet-unrealised “grey-swan” catastrophic events. While useful for informing site-spec...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Book Part |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Cham
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/ https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/8/978-3-031-08568-0_10.pdf https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/1/Counterfactuals_HurricaneRisk_BookChapter_post-2nd-reviews_281021_clean.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08568-0_10 |
id |
ftunivreading:oai:centaur.reading.ac.uk:107576 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivreading:oai:centaur.reading.ac.uk:107576 2024-09-15T18:22:54+00:00 Identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of North Atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble NWP re-forecasts Philp, Tom J. Champion, Adrian J. Hodges, Kevin I. Pigott, Catherine MacFarlane, Andrew Wragg, George Zhao, Steve Collins, J. M. Done, J. M. 2022 text https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/ https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/8/978-3-031-08568-0_10.pdf https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/1/Counterfactuals_HurricaneRisk_BookChapter_post-2nd-reviews_281021_clean.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08568-0_10 en eng Springer Cham https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/8/978-3-031-08568-0_10.pdf https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/1/Counterfactuals_HurricaneRisk_BookChapter_post-2nd-reviews_281021_clean.pdf Philp, T. J., Champion, A. J., Hodges, K. I. <https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/view/creators/90000463.html> orcid:0000-0003-0894-229X , Pigott, C., MacFarlane, A., Wragg, G. and Zhao, S. (2022) Identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of North Atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble NWP re-forecasts. In: Collins, J. M. and Done, J. M. (eds.) Hurricane Risk in a Changing Climate. Hurricane Risk, 2 (2). Springer Cham, pp. 233-254. ISBN 9783031085673 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08568-0_10 <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08568-0_10> cc_by_4 Book or Report Section PeerReviewed 2022 ftunivreading https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08568-0_10 2024-07-30T14:08:26Z Downward counterfactual analysis – or quantitatively estimating how our observed history could have been worse – is increasingly being used by the re/insurance industry to identify, quantify, and mitigate against as-yet-unrealised “grey-swan” catastrophic events. While useful for informing site-specific adaptation strategies, the extraction of probabilistic information remains intangible from such downside-only focused analytics. We hypothesise that combined upward and downward counterfactual analysis (i.e., how history could have been either better or worse) may allow us to obtain probabilistic information from counterfactual research if it can be applied objectively and without bias. Here we test this concept of objective counterfactual analysis by investigating how initial-condition-driven track variability of events in our North Atlantic Hurricane (NAHU) record may affect present-day probabilistic views of US landfall risk. To do this, we create 10,000 counterfactual NAHU histories from NCEP GEFS v2 initial-condition ensemble reforecast data for the period 1985-2016 and compare the statistics of these counterfactual histories to a model-based version of our single observational history. While the methodology presented herein attempts to produce the histories as objectively as possible, there is clear – and, ultimately, intuitively understandable – systematic underprediction of US NAHU landfall frequency in the counterfactual histories. This limits the ability to use the data in real-world applications at present. However, even with this systematic under-prediction, it is interesting to note both the magnitude of volatility and spatial variability in hurricane landfalls in single cities and wider regions along the US coastline, which speaks to the potential value of objective counterfactual analysis once methods have evolved. Book Part North Atlantic CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading 233 254 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading |
op_collection_id |
ftunivreading |
language |
English |
description |
Downward counterfactual analysis – or quantitatively estimating how our observed history could have been worse – is increasingly being used by the re/insurance industry to identify, quantify, and mitigate against as-yet-unrealised “grey-swan” catastrophic events. While useful for informing site-specific adaptation strategies, the extraction of probabilistic information remains intangible from such downside-only focused analytics. We hypothesise that combined upward and downward counterfactual analysis (i.e., how history could have been either better or worse) may allow us to obtain probabilistic information from counterfactual research if it can be applied objectively and without bias. Here we test this concept of objective counterfactual analysis by investigating how initial-condition-driven track variability of events in our North Atlantic Hurricane (NAHU) record may affect present-day probabilistic views of US landfall risk. To do this, we create 10,000 counterfactual NAHU histories from NCEP GEFS v2 initial-condition ensemble reforecast data for the period 1985-2016 and compare the statistics of these counterfactual histories to a model-based version of our single observational history. While the methodology presented herein attempts to produce the histories as objectively as possible, there is clear – and, ultimately, intuitively understandable – systematic underprediction of US NAHU landfall frequency in the counterfactual histories. This limits the ability to use the data in real-world applications at present. However, even with this systematic under-prediction, it is interesting to note both the magnitude of volatility and spatial variability in hurricane landfalls in single cities and wider regions along the US coastline, which speaks to the potential value of objective counterfactual analysis once methods have evolved. |
author2 |
Collins, J. M. Done, J. M. |
format |
Book Part |
author |
Philp, Tom J. Champion, Adrian J. Hodges, Kevin I. Pigott, Catherine MacFarlane, Andrew Wragg, George Zhao, Steve |
spellingShingle |
Philp, Tom J. Champion, Adrian J. Hodges, Kevin I. Pigott, Catherine MacFarlane, Andrew Wragg, George Zhao, Steve Identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of North Atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble NWP re-forecasts |
author_facet |
Philp, Tom J. Champion, Adrian J. Hodges, Kevin I. Pigott, Catherine MacFarlane, Andrew Wragg, George Zhao, Steve |
author_sort |
Philp, Tom J. |
title |
Identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of North Atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble NWP re-forecasts |
title_short |
Identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of North Atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble NWP re-forecasts |
title_full |
Identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of North Atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble NWP re-forecasts |
title_fullStr |
Identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of North Atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble NWP re-forecasts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of North Atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble NWP re-forecasts |
title_sort |
identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of north atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble nwp re-forecasts |
publisher |
Springer Cham |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/ https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/8/978-3-031-08568-0_10.pdf https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/1/Counterfactuals_HurricaneRisk_BookChapter_post-2nd-reviews_281021_clean.pdf https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08568-0_10 |
genre |
North Atlantic |
genre_facet |
North Atlantic |
op_relation |
https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/8/978-3-031-08568-0_10.pdf https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/107576/1/Counterfactuals_HurricaneRisk_BookChapter_post-2nd-reviews_281021_clean.pdf Philp, T. J., Champion, A. J., Hodges, K. I. <https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/view/creators/90000463.html> orcid:0000-0003-0894-229X , Pigott, C., MacFarlane, A., Wragg, G. and Zhao, S. (2022) Identifying limitations when deriving probabilistic views of North Atlantic hurricane hazard from counterfactual ensemble NWP re-forecasts. In: Collins, J. M. and Done, J. M. (eds.) Hurricane Risk in a Changing Climate. Hurricane Risk, 2 (2). Springer Cham, pp. 233-254. ISBN 9783031085673 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08568-0_10 <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08568-0_10> |
op_rights |
cc_by_4 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08568-0_10 |
container_start_page |
233 |
op_container_end_page |
254 |
_version_ |
1810462954650337280 |