X-Ray tomography-based microstructure representation in the Snow Microwave Radiative Transfer model

• Published in: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
• Main Authors: Sandells, Melody, Lowe, Henning, Picard, Ghislain, Dumont, Marie, Essery, Richard, Floury, Nicolas, Kontu, Anna, Lemmetyinen, Juha, Maslanka, William, Morin, Samuel, Wiesmann, Andreas, Matzler, Christian
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society 2022
• Subjects: Sodankylä
• Online Access: https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/101250/; https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/101250/9/X-Ray_Tomography-Based_Microstructure_Representation_in_the_Snow_Microwave_Radiative_Transfer_Model.pdf

The modular Snow Microwave Radiative Transfer (SMRT) model simulates microwave scattering behavior in snow via different selectable theories and snow microstructure representations, which is well suited to intercomparisons analyses. Here, five microstructure models were parameterized from X-ray tomography and thin-section images of snow samples and evaluated with SMRT. Three field experiments provided observations of scattering and absorption coefficients, brightness temperature, and/or backscatter with the increasing complexity of snowpack. These took place in Sodankylä, Finland, and Weissfluhjoch, Switzerland. Simulations of scattering and absorption coefficients agreed well with observations, with higher errors for snow with predominantly vertical structures. For simulation of brightness temperature, difficulty in retrieving stickiness with the Sticky Hard Sphere microstructure model resulted in relatively poor performance for two experiments, but good agreement for the third. Exponential microstructure gave generally good results, near to the best performing models for two field experiments. The Independent Sphere model gave intermediate results. New Teubner–Strey and Gaussian Random Field models demonstrated the advantages of SMRT over microwave models with restricted microstructural geometry. Relative model performance is assessed by the quality of the microstructure model fit to microcomputed tomography (CT) data and further improvements may be possible with different fitting techniques. Careful consideration of simulation stratigraphy is required in this new era of high resolution microstructure measurement as layers thinner than the wavelength introduce artificial scattering boundaries not seen by the instrument.