Social structure in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)

Although largely solitary, humpback whales exhibit a number of behaviours where individuals co-operate with one another, for example during bubble net feeding. Such cases could be due to reciprocal altruism brought on by exceptional circumstances, for example the presence of abundant shoaling fish....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular Ecology
Main Authors: Valsecchi, E., Hale, P. T., Corkeron, P., Amos, W.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Blackwell Scientific 2002
Subjects:
Bay
C1
Online Access:https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:62820
id ftunivqespace:oai:espace.library.uq.edu.au:UQ:62820
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivqespace:oai:espace.library.uq.edu.au:UQ:62820 2023-05-15T16:36:10+02:00 Social structure in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) Valsecchi, E. Hale, P. T. Corkeron, P. Amos, W. 2002-03-01 https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:62820 eng eng Blackwell Scientific doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01459.x issn:0962-1083 Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Ecology Evolutionary Biology Cetaceans Kinship Microsatellites Migration Relatedness Social Behaviour Population-structure Halichoerus-grypus Genetic Diversity Dna Variation Bay Association Movements Evolution Patterns 270203 Population and Ecological Genetics C1 770302 Living resources (incl. impacts of fishing on non-target species) Journal Article 2002 ftunivqespace https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01459.x 2020-08-04T01:30:58Z Although largely solitary, humpback whales exhibit a number of behaviours where individuals co-operate with one another, for example during bubble net feeding. Such cases could be due to reciprocal altruism brought on by exceptional circumstances, for example the presence of abundant shoaling fish. An alternative explanation is that these behaviours have evolved through kin selection. With little restriction to either communication or movement, diffuse groups of relatives could maintain some form of social organization without the need to travel in tight-nit units. To try to distinguish between these hypotheses, we took advantage of the fact that migrating humpback whales often swim together in small groups. If kin selection is important in humpback whale biology, these groups should be enriched for relatives. Consequently, we analysed biopsy samples from 57 groups of humpback whales migrating off Eastern Australia in 1992. A total of 142 whales were screened for eight microsatellite markers. Mitochondrial DNA sequences (371 bp) were also used to verify and assist kinship identification. Our data add support to the notion that mothers travel with their offspring for the first year of the calf's life. However, beyond the presence of mother-calf/yearling pairs, no obvious relatedness pattern was found among whales sampled either in the same pod or on the same day. Levels of relatedness did not vary between migratory phases (towards or away from the breeding ground), nor between the two sexes considered either overall or in the north or south migrations separately. These findings suggest that, if any social organization does exist, it is formed transiently when needed rather than being a constant feature of the population, and hence is more likely based on reciprocal altruism than kin selection. Article in Journal/Newspaper Humpback Whale Megaptera novaeangliae The University of Queensland: UQ eSpace Molecular Ecology 11 3 507 518
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Queensland: UQ eSpace
op_collection_id ftunivqespace
language English
topic Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Ecology
Evolutionary Biology
Cetaceans
Kinship
Microsatellites
Migration
Relatedness
Social Behaviour
Population-structure
Halichoerus-grypus
Genetic Diversity
Dna Variation
Bay
Association
Movements
Evolution
Patterns
270203 Population and Ecological Genetics
C1
770302 Living resources (incl. impacts of fishing on non-target species)
spellingShingle Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Ecology
Evolutionary Biology
Cetaceans
Kinship
Microsatellites
Migration
Relatedness
Social Behaviour
Population-structure
Halichoerus-grypus
Genetic Diversity
Dna Variation
Bay
Association
Movements
Evolution
Patterns
270203 Population and Ecological Genetics
C1
770302 Living resources (incl. impacts of fishing on non-target species)
Valsecchi, E.
Hale, P. T.
Corkeron, P.
Amos, W.
Social structure in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)
topic_facet Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Ecology
Evolutionary Biology
Cetaceans
Kinship
Microsatellites
Migration
Relatedness
Social Behaviour
Population-structure
Halichoerus-grypus
Genetic Diversity
Dna Variation
Bay
Association
Movements
Evolution
Patterns
270203 Population and Ecological Genetics
C1
770302 Living resources (incl. impacts of fishing on non-target species)
description Although largely solitary, humpback whales exhibit a number of behaviours where individuals co-operate with one another, for example during bubble net feeding. Such cases could be due to reciprocal altruism brought on by exceptional circumstances, for example the presence of abundant shoaling fish. An alternative explanation is that these behaviours have evolved through kin selection. With little restriction to either communication or movement, diffuse groups of relatives could maintain some form of social organization without the need to travel in tight-nit units. To try to distinguish between these hypotheses, we took advantage of the fact that migrating humpback whales often swim together in small groups. If kin selection is important in humpback whale biology, these groups should be enriched for relatives. Consequently, we analysed biopsy samples from 57 groups of humpback whales migrating off Eastern Australia in 1992. A total of 142 whales were screened for eight microsatellite markers. Mitochondrial DNA sequences (371 bp) were also used to verify and assist kinship identification. Our data add support to the notion that mothers travel with their offspring for the first year of the calf's life. However, beyond the presence of mother-calf/yearling pairs, no obvious relatedness pattern was found among whales sampled either in the same pod or on the same day. Levels of relatedness did not vary between migratory phases (towards or away from the breeding ground), nor between the two sexes considered either overall or in the north or south migrations separately. These findings suggest that, if any social organization does exist, it is formed transiently when needed rather than being a constant feature of the population, and hence is more likely based on reciprocal altruism than kin selection.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Valsecchi, E.
Hale, P. T.
Corkeron, P.
Amos, W.
author_facet Valsecchi, E.
Hale, P. T.
Corkeron, P.
Amos, W.
author_sort Valsecchi, E.
title Social structure in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)
title_short Social structure in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)
title_full Social structure in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)
title_fullStr Social structure in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)
title_full_unstemmed Social structure in migrating humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae)
title_sort social structure in migrating humpback whales (megaptera novaeangliae)
publisher Blackwell Scientific
publishDate 2002
url https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:62820
genre Humpback Whale
Megaptera novaeangliae
genre_facet Humpback Whale
Megaptera novaeangliae
op_relation doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01459.x
issn:0962-1083
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01459.x
container_title Molecular Ecology
container_volume 11
container_issue 3
container_start_page 507
op_container_end_page 518
_version_ 1766026467977723904