Histology of dart tag insertion sites in the epaulette shark

Samples of dermal and epidermal tissues of epaulette sharks Hemiscyllium ocellatum were examined histologically to assess damage caused by tagging. Tissues from around tag sites were removed at time intervals ranging from 100 min to 284 days post-tagging. These samples showed acute and chronic respo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Fish Biology
Main Authors: Heupel, MR, Bennett, MB
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: ACADEMIC PRESS LTD 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:57664
id ftunivqespace:oai:espace.library.uq.edu.au:UQ:57664
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivqespace:oai:espace.library.uq.edu.au:UQ:57664 2023-05-15T17:34:21+02:00 Histology of dart tag insertion sites in the epaulette shark Heupel, MR Bennett, MB 1997-01-01 https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:57664 eng eng ACADEMIC PRESS LTD doi:10.1006/jfbi.1996.0370 issn:0022-1112 issn:1095-8649 orcid:0000-0001-8051-0040 Fisheries Marine & Freshwater Biology Epaulette Shark Hemiscyllium Ocellatum Dart Tag Injury Repair Elasmobranch Western North-atlantic Great-barrier-reef Abundance Growth 1104 Aquatic Science 1105 Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematics Journal Article 1997 ftunivqespace https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.1996.0370 2020-08-04T00:02:25Z Samples of dermal and epidermal tissues of epaulette sharks Hemiscyllium ocellatum were examined histologically to assess damage caused by tagging. Tissues from around tag sites were removed at time intervals ranging from 100 min to 284 days post-tagging. These samples showed acute and chronic responses to tagging. Acute responses consisted of localized tissue breakdown and haemorrhaging, and occurred within the first few hours after tag insertion. At 10 h post-tagging, an intermediate response was apparent. This phase was characterized by further haemorrhaging and red and white blood cell movement into the wound area. The chronic response observed in the 10-284-day post-tagging samples was characterized by fibrous tissue formation to sequester the tag. This tissue presumably protects the adjacent musculature from further trauma produced by movement of the tag and provides a continuous barrier between the internal and external milieu. Tissue repair appeared to progress consistently in all specimens and no secondary infections at the tag site were seen. Tagging produced only localized tissue disruption and did not appear to be detrimental to the long term health of individual sharks. Our findings show that spaghetti style dart tagging is an acceptable method for marking individuals (40-75+ cm total length) of this species. (C) 1997 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic The University of Queensland: UQ eSpace Journal of Fish Biology 50 5 1034 1041
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Queensland: UQ eSpace
op_collection_id ftunivqespace
language English
topic Fisheries
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Epaulette Shark
Hemiscyllium Ocellatum
Dart Tag
Injury
Repair
Elasmobranch
Western North-atlantic
Great-barrier-reef
Abundance
Growth
1104 Aquatic Science
1105 Ecology
Evolution
Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Fisheries
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Epaulette Shark
Hemiscyllium Ocellatum
Dart Tag
Injury
Repair
Elasmobranch
Western North-atlantic
Great-barrier-reef
Abundance
Growth
1104 Aquatic Science
1105 Ecology
Evolution
Behavior and Systematics
Heupel, MR
Bennett, MB
Histology of dart tag insertion sites in the epaulette shark
topic_facet Fisheries
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Epaulette Shark
Hemiscyllium Ocellatum
Dart Tag
Injury
Repair
Elasmobranch
Western North-atlantic
Great-barrier-reef
Abundance
Growth
1104 Aquatic Science
1105 Ecology
Evolution
Behavior and Systematics
description Samples of dermal and epidermal tissues of epaulette sharks Hemiscyllium ocellatum were examined histologically to assess damage caused by tagging. Tissues from around tag sites were removed at time intervals ranging from 100 min to 284 days post-tagging. These samples showed acute and chronic responses to tagging. Acute responses consisted of localized tissue breakdown and haemorrhaging, and occurred within the first few hours after tag insertion. At 10 h post-tagging, an intermediate response was apparent. This phase was characterized by further haemorrhaging and red and white blood cell movement into the wound area. The chronic response observed in the 10-284-day post-tagging samples was characterized by fibrous tissue formation to sequester the tag. This tissue presumably protects the adjacent musculature from further trauma produced by movement of the tag and provides a continuous barrier between the internal and external milieu. Tissue repair appeared to progress consistently in all specimens and no secondary infections at the tag site were seen. Tagging produced only localized tissue disruption and did not appear to be detrimental to the long term health of individual sharks. Our findings show that spaghetti style dart tagging is an acceptable method for marking individuals (40-75+ cm total length) of this species. (C) 1997 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Heupel, MR
Bennett, MB
author_facet Heupel, MR
Bennett, MB
author_sort Heupel, MR
title Histology of dart tag insertion sites in the epaulette shark
title_short Histology of dart tag insertion sites in the epaulette shark
title_full Histology of dart tag insertion sites in the epaulette shark
title_fullStr Histology of dart tag insertion sites in the epaulette shark
title_full_unstemmed Histology of dart tag insertion sites in the epaulette shark
title_sort histology of dart tag insertion sites in the epaulette shark
publisher ACADEMIC PRESS LTD
publishDate 1997
url https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:57664
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation doi:10.1006/jfbi.1996.0370
issn:0022-1112
issn:1095-8649
orcid:0000-0001-8051-0040
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.1996.0370
container_title Journal of Fish Biology
container_volume 50
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1034
op_container_end_page 1041
_version_ 1766133147698724864