Potential motivational information encoded within humpback whale non-song vocal sounds

• Published in: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
• Main Author: Dunlop, Rebecca A.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: A I P Publishing LLC 2017
• Subjects: Eating Killer Whales; Megaptera-Novaeangliae; Orcinus-Orca; Structural Rules; British-Columbia; Acoustic Communication; Tursiops-Truncatus; Agonistic Screams; Vancouver-Island; Mammal Sounds; 1201 Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous); 3102 Acoustics and Ultrasonics; baleen whale; Humpback Whale; Megaptera novaeangliae; Orca; Orcinus orca
• Online Access: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:547980

Acoustic signals in terrestrial animals follow motivational-structural rules to inform receivers of the signaler's motivational state, valence and level of arousal. Low-frequency “harsh” signals are produced in aggressive contexts, whereas high-frequency tonal sounds are produced in fearful/appeasement contexts. Using the non-song social call catalogue of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae), this study tested for potential motivational-structural rules within the call catalogue of a baleen whale species. A total of 32 groups within different social contexts (ranging from stable, low arousal groups, such as a female with her calf, to affiliating, higher arousal, groups containing multiple males competing for access to the central female) were visually and acoustically tracked as they migrated southwards along the eastern coast of Australia. Social calls separated into four main cluster types, with signal structures in two categories consistent with “aggressive” signals and, “fearful/appeasement” signals in terrestrial animals. The group's use of signals within these clusters matched their context in that presumed low arousal non-affiliating groups almost exclusively used “low-arousal” signals (a cluster of low frequency unmodulated or upsweep sounds). Affiliating groups used a higher proportion of an intermediate cluster of signal types deemed “higher arousal” signals and groups containing three or more adults used a higher proportion of “aggressive” signal types.