Analysis of tissue responses to fin tagging in Australian carcharhinids

Tissue responses to the application of Rototags and Jumbo Rototags in the first dorsal fin of Carcharhinus melanopterus, C. obscurus and C. plumbeus were examined. The acute response included tissue tearing and haemorrhage and was present by 5 days post-tagging. The intermediate response had begun b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Fish Biology
Main Authors: Heupel, MR, Simpfendorfer, CA, Bennett, MB
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: ACADEMIC PRESS LTD 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:34735
id ftunivqespace:oai:espace.library.uq.edu.au:UQ:34735
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivqespace:oai:espace.library.uq.edu.au:UQ:34735 2023-05-15T17:33:59+02:00 Analysis of tissue responses to fin tagging in Australian carcharhinids Heupel, MR Simpfendorfer, CA Bennett, MB 1998-01-01 https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:34735 eng eng ACADEMIC PRESS LTD doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb02021.x issn:0022-1112 issn:1095-8649 orcid:0000-0001-8051-0040 Fisheries Marine & Freshwater Biology Elasmobranch Rototag Injury Repair Shark Western North-atlantic Growth Journal Article 1998 ftunivqespace https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb02021.x 2020-08-03T23:23:20Z Tissue responses to the application of Rototags and Jumbo Rototags in the first dorsal fin of Carcharhinus melanopterus, C. obscurus and C. plumbeus were examined. The acute response included tissue tearing and haemorrhage and was present by 5 days post-tagging. The intermediate response had begun by 20 days post-tagging and continued beyond 207 days. This response involved decreased red blood cell activity as the inflammatory response commenced. The chronic response had begun by 301 days and was complete by 553 days with a layer of fibrous connective tissue walling off the tag. External damage to the fin was caused by continued abrasion by the tag. Repair scales were observed at 242 days using scanning electron microscopy and were confirmed histologically in 61- and 553-day samples. Repair scales were not seen in areas of continuous abrasion. No infection was observed in tissues surrounding the wound. Disruption of the fin surface was observed due to abrasion by the tag, but did not appear to cause a severe tissue reaction. The tissue responses observed were consistent with a normal, but relatively slow, healing in the vicinity of the tag wound. Use of Rototags or Jumbo Rototags appears to be an efficient way of marking elasmobranchs with minimal damage to the shark. (C) 1998 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic The University of Queensland: UQ eSpace Journal of Fish Biology 52 3 610 620
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Queensland: UQ eSpace
op_collection_id ftunivqespace
language English
topic Fisheries
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Elasmobranch
Rototag
Injury
Repair
Shark
Western North-atlantic
Growth
spellingShingle Fisheries
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Elasmobranch
Rototag
Injury
Repair
Shark
Western North-atlantic
Growth
Heupel, MR
Simpfendorfer, CA
Bennett, MB
Analysis of tissue responses to fin tagging in Australian carcharhinids
topic_facet Fisheries
Marine & Freshwater Biology
Elasmobranch
Rototag
Injury
Repair
Shark
Western North-atlantic
Growth
description Tissue responses to the application of Rototags and Jumbo Rototags in the first dorsal fin of Carcharhinus melanopterus, C. obscurus and C. plumbeus were examined. The acute response included tissue tearing and haemorrhage and was present by 5 days post-tagging. The intermediate response had begun by 20 days post-tagging and continued beyond 207 days. This response involved decreased red blood cell activity as the inflammatory response commenced. The chronic response had begun by 301 days and was complete by 553 days with a layer of fibrous connective tissue walling off the tag. External damage to the fin was caused by continued abrasion by the tag. Repair scales were observed at 242 days using scanning electron microscopy and were confirmed histologically in 61- and 553-day samples. Repair scales were not seen in areas of continuous abrasion. No infection was observed in tissues surrounding the wound. Disruption of the fin surface was observed due to abrasion by the tag, but did not appear to cause a severe tissue reaction. The tissue responses observed were consistent with a normal, but relatively slow, healing in the vicinity of the tag wound. Use of Rototags or Jumbo Rototags appears to be an efficient way of marking elasmobranchs with minimal damage to the shark. (C) 1998 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Heupel, MR
Simpfendorfer, CA
Bennett, MB
author_facet Heupel, MR
Simpfendorfer, CA
Bennett, MB
author_sort Heupel, MR
title Analysis of tissue responses to fin tagging in Australian carcharhinids
title_short Analysis of tissue responses to fin tagging in Australian carcharhinids
title_full Analysis of tissue responses to fin tagging in Australian carcharhinids
title_fullStr Analysis of tissue responses to fin tagging in Australian carcharhinids
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of tissue responses to fin tagging in Australian carcharhinids
title_sort analysis of tissue responses to fin tagging in australian carcharhinids
publisher ACADEMIC PRESS LTD
publishDate 1998
url https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:34735
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb02021.x
issn:0022-1112
issn:1095-8649
orcid:0000-0001-8051-0040
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb02021.x
container_title Journal of Fish Biology
container_volume 52
container_issue 3
container_start_page 610
op_container_end_page 620
_version_ 1766132664769708032