How well does the continuous plankton recorder (CPR) sample zooplankton? A comparison with the Longhurst Hardy Plankton Recorder (LHPR) in the northeast Atlantic

• Published in: Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers
• Main Authors: Richardson, Anthony J., John, Eurgain H., Irigoien, Xabier, Harris, Roger P., Hays, Graeme C.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd 2004
• Subjects: Oceanography; zooplankton; copepods; Ocean Weather Station India; continuous plankton recorder (CPR); longhurst-hardy plankton recorder (LHPR); Calanus-finmarchicus; C-helgolandicus; Time-series; Vertical-distribution; Temporal Patterns; Sea; Environment; Abundance; Dynamics; Model; 0405 Oceanography; Longhurst; Calanus finmarchicus; North Atlantic; Northeast Atlantic; Copepods
• Online Access: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:111716

The Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) survey has collected data on basin-scale zooplankton abundance in the North Atlantic since the 1930s. These data have been used in many studies to elucidate seasonal patterns and long-term change in plankton populations, as well as more recently to validate ecosystem models. There has, however, been relatively little comparison of the data from the CPR with that from other samplers. In this study we compare zooplankton abundance estimated from the CPR in the northeast Atlantic with near-surface samples collected by a Longhurst-Hardy Plankton Recorder (LHPR) at Ocean Weather Station India (59degreesN, 19degreesW) between 1971 and 1975. Comparisons were made for six common copepods in the region: Acartia clausi, Calanus finmarchicus, Euchaeta norvegica, Metridia lucens, Oithona sp., and Pleuromamma robusta. Seasonal cycles based on CPR data were similar to those recorded by the LHPR. Differences in absolute abundances were apparent, however, with the CPR underestimating abundances by a factor of between 5 and 40, with the exception of A. clausi. Active avoidance by zooplankton is thought to be responsible. This avoidance is species specific, so that care must be taken describing communities, as the CPR emphasises those species that are preferentially caught, a problem common to many plankton samplers. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.