Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity
S1 DATA. Table of proposed management strategies for conserving Antarctic biodiversity to the end of this century, detailing strategy objectives, specific actions that make up the strategy, costs, and feasibility of each action. S2 DATA. Workbook containing the numerical values underlying the figure...
Published in: | PLOS Biology |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/92783 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921 |
id |
ftunivpretoria:oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/92783 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunivpretoria:oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/92783 2023-11-05T03:32:32+01:00 Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity Lee, Jasmine R. Terauds, Aleks Carwardine, Josie Shaw, Justine D. Fuller, Richard A. Possingham, Hugh P. Chown, Steven L. Convey, Peter Gilbert, Neil Hughes, Kevin A. McIvor, Ewan Robinson, Sharon A. Ropert-Coudert, Yan Bergstrom, Dana M. Biersma, Elisabeth M. Christian, Claire Cowan, Don A. Frenot, Yves Jenouvrier, Stephanie Kelley, Lisa Lee, Michael J. Lynch, Heather J. Njastad, Birgit Quesada, Antonio Roura, Ricardo M. Shaw, E. Ashley Stanwell- Smith, Damon Tsujimoto, Megumu Wall, Diana H. Wilmotte, Annick Chades, Iadine 2022-12-22 application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet http://hdl.handle.net/2263/92783 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921 en eng Public Library of Science Lee, J.R., Terauds A., Carwardine, J., et al. (2022) Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity. PLoS Biology 20(12): e3001921. https://DOI.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921. 1544-9173 (print) 1545-7885 (online) doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/92783 © 2022 Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Climate change Penguins Threats Dry soil SDG-13: Climate action SDG-15: Life on land Article 2022 ftunivpretoria https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921 2023-10-10T00:30:06Z S1 DATA. Table of proposed management strategies for conserving Antarctic biodiversity to the end of this century, detailing strategy objectives, specific actions that make up the strategy, costs, and feasibility of each action. S2 DATA. Workbook containing the numerical values underlying the figures in the main text and Supporting information. The values for each figure are provided in separate worksheets. These values were calculated from the raw values using the methods described in the “Materials and methods” section of the main text. The cost and feasibility values are available in S1 Data. The averaged expert intactness and benefit values are available on the Australian Antarctic Data Centre: https://doi.org/10.26179/5da8f8e7a2256. S1 TEXT. PDF file containing the supporting figures and tables for “Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity”. File contains Figs A–F and Tables A–N. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : Antarctic priority threat management database containing intactness values, benefits and uncertainties for each biodiversity taxon are available from the Australian Antarctic Data Centre (AADC; https://DOI.org/10.26179/5da8f8e7a2256). Action, cost and feasibility information, as well as the numerical values underlying the Figures, are included within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity faces multiple threats, from invasive species to climate change. Yet no large-scale assessments of threat management strategies exist. Applying a structured participatory approach, we demonstrate that existing conservation efforts are insufficient in a changing world, estimating that 65% (at best 37%, at worst 97%) of native terrestrial taxa and land-associated seabirds are likely to decline by 2100 under current trajectories. Emperor penguins are identified as the most vulnerable taxon, followed by other seabirds and dry soil nematodes. We find that implementing 10 key threat management strategies in parallel, at an estimated present-day ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Emperor penguins University of Pretoria: UPSpace PLOS Biology 20 12 e3001921 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Pretoria: UPSpace |
op_collection_id |
ftunivpretoria |
language |
English |
topic |
Climate change Penguins Threats Dry soil SDG-13: Climate action SDG-15: Life on land |
spellingShingle |
Climate change Penguins Threats Dry soil SDG-13: Climate action SDG-15: Life on land Lee, Jasmine R. Terauds, Aleks Carwardine, Josie Shaw, Justine D. Fuller, Richard A. Possingham, Hugh P. Chown, Steven L. Convey, Peter Gilbert, Neil Hughes, Kevin A. McIvor, Ewan Robinson, Sharon A. Ropert-Coudert, Yan Bergstrom, Dana M. Biersma, Elisabeth M. Christian, Claire Cowan, Don A. Frenot, Yves Jenouvrier, Stephanie Kelley, Lisa Lee, Michael J. Lynch, Heather J. Njastad, Birgit Quesada, Antonio Roura, Ricardo M. Shaw, E. Ashley Stanwell- Smith, Damon Tsujimoto, Megumu Wall, Diana H. Wilmotte, Annick Chades, Iadine Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity |
topic_facet |
Climate change Penguins Threats Dry soil SDG-13: Climate action SDG-15: Life on land |
description |
S1 DATA. Table of proposed management strategies for conserving Antarctic biodiversity to the end of this century, detailing strategy objectives, specific actions that make up the strategy, costs, and feasibility of each action. S2 DATA. Workbook containing the numerical values underlying the figures in the main text and Supporting information. The values for each figure are provided in separate worksheets. These values were calculated from the raw values using the methods described in the “Materials and methods” section of the main text. The cost and feasibility values are available in S1 Data. The averaged expert intactness and benefit values are available on the Australian Antarctic Data Centre: https://doi.org/10.26179/5da8f8e7a2256. S1 TEXT. PDF file containing the supporting figures and tables for “Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity”. File contains Figs A–F and Tables A–N. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : Antarctic priority threat management database containing intactness values, benefits and uncertainties for each biodiversity taxon are available from the Australian Antarctic Data Centre (AADC; https://DOI.org/10.26179/5da8f8e7a2256). Action, cost and feasibility information, as well as the numerical values underlying the Figures, are included within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity faces multiple threats, from invasive species to climate change. Yet no large-scale assessments of threat management strategies exist. Applying a structured participatory approach, we demonstrate that existing conservation efforts are insufficient in a changing world, estimating that 65% (at best 37%, at worst 97%) of native terrestrial taxa and land-associated seabirds are likely to decline by 2100 under current trajectories. Emperor penguins are identified as the most vulnerable taxon, followed by other seabirds and dry soil nematodes. We find that implementing 10 key threat management strategies in parallel, at an estimated present-day ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Lee, Jasmine R. Terauds, Aleks Carwardine, Josie Shaw, Justine D. Fuller, Richard A. Possingham, Hugh P. Chown, Steven L. Convey, Peter Gilbert, Neil Hughes, Kevin A. McIvor, Ewan Robinson, Sharon A. Ropert-Coudert, Yan Bergstrom, Dana M. Biersma, Elisabeth M. Christian, Claire Cowan, Don A. Frenot, Yves Jenouvrier, Stephanie Kelley, Lisa Lee, Michael J. Lynch, Heather J. Njastad, Birgit Quesada, Antonio Roura, Ricardo M. Shaw, E. Ashley Stanwell- Smith, Damon Tsujimoto, Megumu Wall, Diana H. Wilmotte, Annick Chades, Iadine |
author_facet |
Lee, Jasmine R. Terauds, Aleks Carwardine, Josie Shaw, Justine D. Fuller, Richard A. Possingham, Hugh P. Chown, Steven L. Convey, Peter Gilbert, Neil Hughes, Kevin A. McIvor, Ewan Robinson, Sharon A. Ropert-Coudert, Yan Bergstrom, Dana M. Biersma, Elisabeth M. Christian, Claire Cowan, Don A. Frenot, Yves Jenouvrier, Stephanie Kelley, Lisa Lee, Michael J. Lynch, Heather J. Njastad, Birgit Quesada, Antonio Roura, Ricardo M. Shaw, E. Ashley Stanwell- Smith, Damon Tsujimoto, Megumu Wall, Diana H. Wilmotte, Annick Chades, Iadine |
author_sort |
Lee, Jasmine R. |
title |
Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity |
title_short |
Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity |
title_full |
Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity |
title_fullStr |
Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity |
title_sort |
threat management priorities for conserving antarctic biodiversity |
publisher |
Public Library of Science |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2263/92783 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921 |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Emperor penguins |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Emperor penguins |
op_relation |
Lee, J.R., Terauds A., Carwardine, J., et al. (2022) Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity. PLoS Biology 20(12): e3001921. https://DOI.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921. 1544-9173 (print) 1545-7885 (online) doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/92783 |
op_rights |
© 2022 Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921 |
container_title |
PLOS Biology |
container_volume |
20 |
container_issue |
12 |
container_start_page |
e3001921 |
_version_ |
1781696029862658048 |