Electricity intensities of the OECD and South Africa : a comparison

This paper investigates the relationship between South Africa’s total electricity intensity and that of the OECD members, a very important trade block. These results will assist in ascertaining possible scope for improvement, if such exists. This is necessary as electricity is an essential input for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Main Authors: Inglesi-Lotz, Roula, Blignaut, James Nelson
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20433
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004
id ftunivpretoria:oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/20433
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivpretoria:oai:repository.up.ac.za:2263/20433 2023-05-15T16:50:09+02:00 Electricity intensities of the OECD and South Africa : a comparison Inglesi-Lotz, Roula Blignaut, James Nelson 2012 http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20433 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004 en eng Elsevier http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20433 R. Inglesi-Lotz & J. Blignaut, Electricity intensities of the OECD and South Africa : a comparison, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 4491-4499 (2012), doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004. 1879-0690 (online) 1364-0321 (print) doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004 © 2012 Elsevier. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology , vol 16, issue 7, 2012, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004. Electricity intensity South Africa Comparison Past trends OECD Postprint Article 2012 ftunivpretoria https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004 2022-05-31T13:32:47Z This paper investigates the relationship between South Africa’s total electricity intensity and that of the OECD members, a very important trade block. These results will assist in ascertaining possible scope for improvement, if such exists. This is necessary as electricity is an essential input for production, and hence it affects the competitiveness of the country. Calculating the electricity intensities, defined as the ratio of electricity consumption to total output, we found that South Africa’s electricity intensity has more than doubled between 1990 and 2007. All the OECD members’ (excluding Iceland) weighted growth in electricity intensity was lower than that of South Africa by a considerable margin. The sectoral analysis showed that the majority of the South African sectors are more electricity intensive. To improve its industrial competitiveness and, as an additional benefit, contribute towards achieving its stated commitments towards reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, South Africa will have to improve its total and sectoral electricity efficiency levels, that not only were higher but also increasing at an alarming rate. SANERI at the South African Department of Energy http://www.elsevier.com/locate/rser Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland University of Pretoria: UPSpace Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16 7 4491 4499
institution Open Polar
collection University of Pretoria: UPSpace
op_collection_id ftunivpretoria
language English
topic Electricity intensity
South Africa
Comparison
Past trends
OECD
spellingShingle Electricity intensity
South Africa
Comparison
Past trends
OECD
Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
Blignaut, James Nelson
Electricity intensities of the OECD and South Africa : a comparison
topic_facet Electricity intensity
South Africa
Comparison
Past trends
OECD
description This paper investigates the relationship between South Africa’s total electricity intensity and that of the OECD members, a very important trade block. These results will assist in ascertaining possible scope for improvement, if such exists. This is necessary as electricity is an essential input for production, and hence it affects the competitiveness of the country. Calculating the electricity intensities, defined as the ratio of electricity consumption to total output, we found that South Africa’s electricity intensity has more than doubled between 1990 and 2007. All the OECD members’ (excluding Iceland) weighted growth in electricity intensity was lower than that of South Africa by a considerable margin. The sectoral analysis showed that the majority of the South African sectors are more electricity intensive. To improve its industrial competitiveness and, as an additional benefit, contribute towards achieving its stated commitments towards reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, South Africa will have to improve its total and sectoral electricity efficiency levels, that not only were higher but also increasing at an alarming rate. SANERI at the South African Department of Energy http://www.elsevier.com/locate/rser
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
Blignaut, James Nelson
author_facet Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
Blignaut, James Nelson
author_sort Inglesi-Lotz, Roula
title Electricity intensities of the OECD and South Africa : a comparison
title_short Electricity intensities of the OECD and South Africa : a comparison
title_full Electricity intensities of the OECD and South Africa : a comparison
title_fullStr Electricity intensities of the OECD and South Africa : a comparison
title_full_unstemmed Electricity intensities of the OECD and South Africa : a comparison
title_sort electricity intensities of the oecd and south africa : a comparison
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20433
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20433
R. Inglesi-Lotz & J. Blignaut, Electricity intensities of the OECD and South Africa : a comparison, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 4491-4499 (2012), doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004.
1879-0690 (online)
1364-0321 (print)
doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004
op_rights © 2012 Elsevier. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology , vol 16, issue 7, 2012, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.004
container_title Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
container_volume 16
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4491
op_container_end_page 4499
_version_ 1766040318414684160