Antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: Do target species matter (Amphibalanus amphitrite versus Semibalanus balanoides)?

Larvae of many benthic invertebrates settle on surfaces where they metamorphose into juveniles if suitable substrata are available, and are responsible for the major costs of biofouling. When assessing new formulations or compounds for potential antifouling (AF) application, constraints such as seas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
Main Authors: Marechal, J-P., Hellio, Claire
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.10.002
https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/antifouling-activity-against-barnacle-cypris-larvae-do-target-species-matter-amphibalanus-amphitrite-versus-semibalanus-balanoides(00bd97ee-5f0c-4c26-9714-b1167056d162).html
https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/ws/files/77387/IBB_marechal_hellio.pdf
id ftunivportsmpubl:oai:researchportal.port.ac.uk:publications/00bd97ee-5f0c-4c26-9714-b1167056d162
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivportsmpubl:oai:researchportal.port.ac.uk:publications/00bd97ee-5f0c-4c26-9714-b1167056d162 2023-05-15T17:38:34+02:00 Antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: Do target species matter (Amphibalanus amphitrite versus Semibalanus balanoides)? Marechal, J-P. Hellio, Claire 2011-01 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.10.002 https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/antifouling-activity-against-barnacle-cypris-larvae-do-target-species-matter-amphibalanus-amphitrite-versus-semibalanus-balanoides(00bd97ee-5f0c-4c26-9714-b1167056d162).html https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/ws/files/77387/IBB_marechal_hellio.pdf eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Marechal , J-P & Hellio , C 2011 , ' Antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: Do target species matter (Amphibalanus amphitrite versus Semibalanus balanoides)? ' International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation , vol 65 , no. 1 , pp. 92-101 . DOI:10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.10.002 /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/biology Biology article 2011 ftunivportsmpubl https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.10.002 2017-09-28T19:29:41Z Larvae of many benthic invertebrates settle on surfaces where they metamorphose into juveniles if suitable substrata are available, and are responsible for the major costs of biofouling. When assessing new formulations or compounds for potential antifouling (AF) application, constraints such as seasonal availability may restrict most bioassays to relatively few taxa and species. For example, amongst barnacles, Amphibalanus amphitrite is popular as a test organism but is it really representative of other barnacle species? In order to test this hypothesis, we have chosen to work with marine natural extracts as a probe. Indeed, one substitution technology to toxic metal-based coatings to control fouling is the development of AF coatings with active compounds derived from marine organisms or analogues of the lead compounds. In this study, the AF activity and toxicity of extracts from 30 algae from the North East Atlantic coast were investigated for their potential anti-settlement activities against larvae of two species of barnacle, A. amphitrite and Semibalanus balanoides. As a trend, most of the active extracts displayed activity towards S. balanoides, only few displayed targeted activity against A. amphitrite, or against both species. In order to better understand if this tendency could be linked to chemical ecology, surface extracts were prepared on a selection of species. The results highlight that surface extracts of algae all displayed highest levels of activity than total extracts when tested on S. balanoides. This difference illustrates that specific compounds in their ecological context can have potentially a better efficacy on target species. Article in Journal/Newspaper North East Atlantic University of Portsmouth: Portsmouth Research Portal International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 65 1 92 101
institution Open Polar
collection University of Portsmouth: Portsmouth Research Portal
op_collection_id ftunivportsmpubl
language English
topic /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/biology
Biology
spellingShingle /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/biology
Biology
Marechal, J-P.
Hellio, Claire
Antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: Do target species matter (Amphibalanus amphitrite versus Semibalanus balanoides)?
topic_facet /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/biology
Biology
description Larvae of many benthic invertebrates settle on surfaces where they metamorphose into juveniles if suitable substrata are available, and are responsible for the major costs of biofouling. When assessing new formulations or compounds for potential antifouling (AF) application, constraints such as seasonal availability may restrict most bioassays to relatively few taxa and species. For example, amongst barnacles, Amphibalanus amphitrite is popular as a test organism but is it really representative of other barnacle species? In order to test this hypothesis, we have chosen to work with marine natural extracts as a probe. Indeed, one substitution technology to toxic metal-based coatings to control fouling is the development of AF coatings with active compounds derived from marine organisms or analogues of the lead compounds. In this study, the AF activity and toxicity of extracts from 30 algae from the North East Atlantic coast were investigated for their potential anti-settlement activities against larvae of two species of barnacle, A. amphitrite and Semibalanus balanoides. As a trend, most of the active extracts displayed activity towards S. balanoides, only few displayed targeted activity against A. amphitrite, or against both species. In order to better understand if this tendency could be linked to chemical ecology, surface extracts were prepared on a selection of species. The results highlight that surface extracts of algae all displayed highest levels of activity than total extracts when tested on S. balanoides. This difference illustrates that specific compounds in their ecological context can have potentially a better efficacy on target species.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Marechal, J-P.
Hellio, Claire
author_facet Marechal, J-P.
Hellio, Claire
author_sort Marechal, J-P.
title Antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: Do target species matter (Amphibalanus amphitrite versus Semibalanus balanoides)?
title_short Antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: Do target species matter (Amphibalanus amphitrite versus Semibalanus balanoides)?
title_full Antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: Do target species matter (Amphibalanus amphitrite versus Semibalanus balanoides)?
title_fullStr Antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: Do target species matter (Amphibalanus amphitrite versus Semibalanus balanoides)?
title_full_unstemmed Antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: Do target species matter (Amphibalanus amphitrite versus Semibalanus balanoides)?
title_sort antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: do target species matter (amphibalanus amphitrite versus semibalanus balanoides)?
publishDate 2011
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.10.002
https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/antifouling-activity-against-barnacle-cypris-larvae-do-target-species-matter-amphibalanus-amphitrite-versus-semibalanus-balanoides(00bd97ee-5f0c-4c26-9714-b1167056d162).html
https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/ws/files/77387/IBB_marechal_hellio.pdf
genre North East Atlantic
genre_facet North East Atlantic
op_source Marechal , J-P & Hellio , C 2011 , ' Antifouling activity against barnacle cypris larvae: Do target species matter (Amphibalanus amphitrite versus Semibalanus balanoides)? ' International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation , vol 65 , no. 1 , pp. 92-101 . DOI:10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.10.002
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.10.002
container_title International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
container_volume 65
container_issue 1
container_start_page 92
op_container_end_page 101
_version_ 1766139061365374976