Reconstructing spring sea ice concentration in the Chukchi Sea over recent centuries: insights into the application of the PIP25 index

• Published in: Environmental Research Letters
• Main Authors: Kim, J-H, Gal, J-K, Jun, S-Y, Smik, L, Kim, D, Belt, ST, Park, K, Shin, K-H, Nam, S-I
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: IOP Publishing 2019
• Subjects: sea ice; HBIs; IP25; epi-brassicasterol; dinosterol; PIP25 index; Chukchi Sea; Arctic; Arctic Ocean; Barents Sea; Chukchi Shelf; Chukchi; Phytoplankton; Sea ice
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15303; https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4b6e

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>In this study, we aimed to reconstruct spring (April–June) sea ice changes in the western Arctic Ocean over recent centuries (ca. the last 250 years) by measuring biomarker distributions in a multicore (ARA01B-03MUC) retrieved from the Chukchi Shelf region and to evaluate outcomes against known or modelled estimates of sea ice conditions. Specifically, we analyzed for the Arctic sea ice proxy IP<jats:sub>25</jats:sub> and assessed the suitability of a further highly branched isoprenoid (HBI) lipid (HBI III), epi-brassicasterol, and dinosterol as complementary biomarkers for use with the so-called phytoplankton marker-IP<jats:sub>25</jats:sub> index (PIP<jats:sub>25</jats:sub>; P<jats:sub>III</jats:sub>IP<jats:sub>25</jats:sub>, P<jats:sub>B</jats:sub>IP<jats:sub>25</jats:sub>, and P<jats:sub>D</jats:sub>IP<jats:sub>25</jats:sub>, respectively). The presence of IP<jats:sub>25</jats:sub> throughout core ARA01B-03MUC confirms the occurrence of seasonal sea ice at the study site over recent centuries. From a semi-quantitative perspective, all three PIP<jats:sub>25</jats:sub> indices gave different trends, with some dependence on the balance factor <jats:italic>c</jats:italic>, a term used in the calculation of the PIP<jats:sub>25</jats:sub> index. P<jats:sub>III</jats:sub>IP<jats:sub>25</jats:sub>-derived spring sea ice concentration (SpSIC) estimates using a <jats:italic>c</jats:italic> value of 0.63, determined previously from analysis of Barents Sea surface sediments, were likely most reliable, since SpSIC values were high throughout the record (SpSIC > 78%), consistent with the modern context for the Chukchi Sea and the mean SpSIC record of the 41 CMIP5 climate models over recent centuries. ...