Source-specific biomarkers as proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice

Over the last decade or so, certain source-specific C25 highly branched isoprenoid (HBI) lipid biomarkers have emerged as useful proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice. Thus, IP25 (Ice proxy with 25 carbon atoms) and IPSO25 (Ice proxy for the Southern Ocean with 25 carbon atoms) represent binary m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Organic Geochemistry
Main Author: Belt, ST
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12842
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.10.002
id ftunivplympearl:oai:pearl.plymouth.ac.uk:10026.1/12842
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunivplympearl:oai:pearl.plymouth.ac.uk:10026.1/12842 2024-05-19T07:32:09+00:00 Source-specific biomarkers as proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice Belt, ST 2018-11 277-298 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12842 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.10.002 en eng Elsevier ISSN:0146-6380 ISSN:1873-5290 E-ISSN:1873-5290 0146-6380 1873-5290 http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12842 doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.10.002 2019-10-5 Not known Biomarkers HBIs IP25 IPSO25 Sea ice Proxies journal-article Review 2018 ftunivplympearl https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.10.002 2024-05-01T00:05:12Z Over the last decade or so, certain source-specific C25 highly branched isoprenoid (HBI) lipid biomarkers have emerged as useful proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice. Thus, IP25 (Ice proxy with 25 carbon atoms) and IPSO25 (Ice proxy for the Southern Ocean with 25 carbon atoms) represent binary measures of past seasonal sea ice in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively. A further tri-unsaturated HBI (generally referred to as HBI III) appears to provide proxy evidence for the region of open water found adjacent to sea ice (i.e. the marginal ice zone (MIZ)) in both polar regions. This review provides an update on current knowledge pertaining to each proxy. The first section focuses on describing those studies that have aimed to establish the underlying features of each proxy, including source identification and spatial distribution characteristics. The second section presents some important analytical considerations pertinent to the accurate identification and quantification of HBI biomarkers. The third section describes how each HBI proxy is normally interpreted within the sedimentary record for palaeo sea ice reconstruction purposes. This includes the interpretation of individual and combined biomarker profiles such as the PIP25 index and multivariate decision tree models. A summary of all previous palaeo sea ice reconstructions based on HBIs is also given, which includes examples that clarify or reinforce our understanding of the individual or combined biomarker signatures. Some knowledge gaps and areas for future research are also briefly described. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Sea ice Southern Ocean PEARL (Plymouth Electronic Archiv & ResearchLibrary, Plymouth University) Organic Geochemistry 125 277 298
institution Open Polar
collection PEARL (Plymouth Electronic Archiv & ResearchLibrary, Plymouth University)
op_collection_id ftunivplympearl
language English
topic Biomarkers
HBIs
IP25
IPSO25
Sea ice
Proxies
spellingShingle Biomarkers
HBIs
IP25
IPSO25
Sea ice
Proxies
Belt, ST
Source-specific biomarkers as proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
topic_facet Biomarkers
HBIs
IP25
IPSO25
Sea ice
Proxies
description Over the last decade or so, certain source-specific C25 highly branched isoprenoid (HBI) lipid biomarkers have emerged as useful proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice. Thus, IP25 (Ice proxy with 25 carbon atoms) and IPSO25 (Ice proxy for the Southern Ocean with 25 carbon atoms) represent binary measures of past seasonal sea ice in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively. A further tri-unsaturated HBI (generally referred to as HBI III) appears to provide proxy evidence for the region of open water found adjacent to sea ice (i.e. the marginal ice zone (MIZ)) in both polar regions. This review provides an update on current knowledge pertaining to each proxy. The first section focuses on describing those studies that have aimed to establish the underlying features of each proxy, including source identification and spatial distribution characteristics. The second section presents some important analytical considerations pertinent to the accurate identification and quantification of HBI biomarkers. The third section describes how each HBI proxy is normally interpreted within the sedimentary record for palaeo sea ice reconstruction purposes. This includes the interpretation of individual and combined biomarker profiles such as the PIP25 index and multivariate decision tree models. A summary of all previous palaeo sea ice reconstructions based on HBIs is also given, which includes examples that clarify or reinforce our understanding of the individual or combined biomarker signatures. Some knowledge gaps and areas for future research are also briefly described.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Belt, ST
author_facet Belt, ST
author_sort Belt, ST
title Source-specific biomarkers as proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
title_short Source-specific biomarkers as proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
title_full Source-specific biomarkers as proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
title_fullStr Source-specific biomarkers as proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
title_full_unstemmed Source-specific biomarkers as proxies for Arctic and Antarctic sea ice
title_sort source-specific biomarkers as proxies for arctic and antarctic sea ice
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12842
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.10.002
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Sea ice
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Sea ice
Southern Ocean
op_relation ISSN:0146-6380
ISSN:1873-5290
E-ISSN:1873-5290
0146-6380
1873-5290
http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12842
doi:10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.10.002
op_rights 2019-10-5
Not known
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.10.002
container_title Organic Geochemistry
container_volume 125
container_start_page 277
op_container_end_page 298
_version_ 1799470109850337280