Paleomagnetism of cretaceous units of the Mametchinskiy Peninsula, Kuyul Region, Northeastern Russia: Implications for development and evolution of the Northwest Pacific Basin

• Main Authors: Harbert, W, Alexutin, M, Sokolov, S, Krylov, K, Grigoriev, V, Heiphetz, A, Graham, R
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2001
• Subjects: Bering Sea; Okhotsk; Pacific; Kamchatka Peninsula; Ukelayat; Kuyul; Olyutorskiy; Penzhinskaya Guba; Kamchatka; Koryak
• Online Access: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/13673/; http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/13673/1/licence.txt

The northernmost part of the Kamchatka Peninsula of northeastern Russia, located along the northwestern margin of the Bering Sea, consists of zones of complexly deformed accreted terranes. Progressing from the northwestern Bering Sea inland are the Olyutorskiy, Ukelayat, and Koryak superterranes, which were accreted to the Okhotsk-Chukotsk volcanic-plutonic belt (OChVB) during the Campanian-Maastrichtian (Koryak) to Middle Eocene (Olyutorskiy), respectively. To constrain the accretion paleolatitude of the Koryak superterrane, we paleomagnetically sampled a sedimentary series on the Mametchinskiy Peninsula. At the Mametchinskiy Peninsula, in the northeastern Penzhinskaya Guba (61.45° N, 163.75° E), a gently deformed, well-bedded section of fine-grained Lower to lower Upper Cretaceous turbidites, the Mametchinskaya and Tylakrylskaya Formations are exposed. These strata, which represent the lower part of the sedimentary cover of the terranes in this region and the forearc of OChVB, were sampled at 39 sites (three to seven samples per site). Within the Ainyn terrane, more than 1000 m of section of Cenomanian-Turonian age was sampled at a basal locality (sample groups I and II, sites 1-18, 19-29) and at an upper locality of Valanginian- Barremian age (sample group III, sites 30-39) along the western shore of the Peninsula. Thermal demagnetization and principal component analysis of the demagnetization data show lower-temperature (A) and higher-temperature (B) magnetic components. Although group III samples did not display a coherent A component, the A component of group I and II samples was observed as a single-polarity lower-unblocking temperature component generally removed by 100- 400°C. This component failed the fold test at the 95% confidence level. With respect to direction, the A component is similar to both the present-day field and axial-geocentric dipole directions expected at this site. The B component was observed during thermal demagnetization steps up to 580 °C and was always of downward-directed ...